Adani controversy: Experts and retired bank officials demand accountability for corporate and policy corruption in India’s power sector

A group of experts from the power sector, retired bureaucrats and bank officials called the People's Commission on Public Sector and Public Services has “demanded an independent judicial investigation into these allegations to uncover the role of implicated entities and public officials, assess the financial loss to consumers, and ensure accountability. Those found guilty must face prosecution, blacklisting and financial penalties, including compensation to affected consumers.

The recent indictment by the US District Court (Eastern District of New York) of Indian entities, including Adani Green and the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), exposes serious corruption involving large-scale corporate collusion and anti-consumer policies. Investigations by the US SEC and FBI reveal how private companies, with support from SECI and the Ministry of Power, pushed one-sided Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), enriching themselves at the cost of electricity consumers and State Power utilities says a statement issued by experts and concerned citizens.

This judgement and arrest warrant by a US District Court follows years of questionable directives from the Ministry of Power, including mandatory procurement of expensive solar power and forced coal imports, benefitting a few business conglomerates while burdening consumers. These actions have strained DISCOM’s finances and defrauded the public.

A group of experts from the power sector, retired bureaucrats and bank officials called the People’s Commission on Public Sector and Public Services has “demanded an independent judicial investigation into these allegations to uncover the role of implicated entities and public officials, assess the financial loss to consumers, and ensure accountability. Those found guilty must face prosecution, blacklisting and financial penalties, including compensation to affected consumers. Besides, the government must present a full report to Parliament within six months to restore public trust and uphold consumer rights.”

The US  District Court (Eastern District Court of New York)’s recent indictment of several Indian companies, including Adani Green, part of the the Adani conglomerate and the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), a CPSE, says the PCPSPS statement raises disturbing concerns not only about large-scale corporate corruption that evidently prevails in India and the USA but also about how fraudulent policies adopted by the Union Ministry of Power at the instance of favoured business conglomerates have defrauded electricity consumers across the country.

In this connection, he PCPSPS has also referred to their statements issued on  June 2, 2022, June 30, 2022 and  August 16, 2024 in which the group of experts had repeatedly pointed out how the Ministry of Power irregularly invoked its authority under Section 11 of the Electricity Act of 2003 to impose an obligation on State power utilities to buy electricity from solar power plants to meet at least 10% of their total electricity requirement, irrespective of its unit cost and affordability. Similarly, the Centre created a man-made coal shortage situation across the country and the Ministry of Power equally irregularly ordered the State power utilities to buy coal from overseas sources to cover the shortage. Both those measures indirectly benefitted a few domestic private business groups known to be close to the ruling political executive at the cost of electricity consumers across the country. Such consumer-unfriendly measures so blatantly adopted by the Ministry led one to the inevitable inference that the policies adopted by the Ministry of Power during the last several years were at the instance of a few business conglomerates close to the executive, certainly not for safeguarding the interests of millions of electricity consumers, many below the poverty line.

The PCPSPS has also expressed the hope that institutions like SEBI function independently so as to reinforce the integrity of the stockmarkets and elicit public trust.

The US court’s judgement, based on detailed investigations by US Security Exchange Commission and the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, clearly points to how the Adani Group officials acting in tandem with a US company persuaded SECI and the State-owned power utilities in several States including Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Chhattisgarh, Odisha and J&K to sign one-sided Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) that would enable those private companies to earn billions of dollars of profits over the next several decades, entirely at the cost of the electricity consumers in India. In the process, ably supported by the Ministry of Power’s anti-consumer policies and diktats, the private companies not only defrauded unwary consumers, crippled DISCOMs’ finances but also committed fraud on the public at large.

The PCPSPS has also demanded that,  under independent judicial oversight, a comprehensive investigation of this be taken up by CBI/ ED/ CBDT and other investigating agencies to gather further evidence from the US SEC/ FBI, factual evidence on the circumstances that led to the Union Ministry of Power adopting such misguided policies and issuing such illegal directives to States, the role of the concerned Indian business conglomerates including the extent to which they unduly benefitted, the one-sided nature of the PPAs, the role of public funcionaries at the Centre and in the States and the extent of loss suffered by electricity consumers in the country.

If the allegations emerging out of the indictment are found to be true, the Commission states that, not only the concerned business conglomerates and their promoters be blacklisted and prohibited from underataking activities in the electricity sector in the future but they should be forced to pay a deterrent penalty in addition to compansating electricity consumers for the additional costs borne by them on account of these acts of malfeasance. The culprits should be prosecuted for their criminal liability under the relevant laws.

Most of all a comprehensive report should be placed before Parliament within six months.


Related:

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC ‘defers’ 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

Supreme Court gives two journalists interim protection from Gujarat police arrest over article against Adani Group (Hindenburg issue)

UP cancels Adani’s tenders even as RSS’ Organiser inspires a social media onslaught alleging a conspiracy against ‘Adani brand of nationalism’

 

Trending

IN FOCUS

Related Articles

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES