Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Communalism Rule of Law

Allahabad HC dismisses petition seeking central law on religious conversions

The court stated that directing legislatures to make laws does not come under its writ jurisdiction, as held by Supreme Court in the past

Sabrangindia 30 Jan 2021

Anti conversion lawImage courtesy: The Economic Times
 

Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition seeking direction to the Centre to consider passing a law regulating religious conversion, like the one passed by Uttar Pradesh. The court dismissed the petition stating that under Article 226 (writ jurisdiction of High Courts) of the Constitution, the court is not empowered to issue such directions to the Legislature, for making any laws, owing to the doctrine of constitutional trust and separation of powers.

The bench comprising Justices Ritu Raj Swathi and Manish Mathur cited a Supreme Court judgement in Manoj Narula v. Union of India reported in (2014) 9 SCC 1 whereby the court had declared a similar petition to be not maintainable basis doctrine of constitutional trust which gives regard to separation of jurisdiction and powers of various constitutional functionaries and authorities. “The doctrine of constitutional trust clearly is with regard to the maxim Salus populi suprema lex esto (Let the good (or safety) of the people be the supreme law). It was held that it cannot be believed that a constitutional authority or functionary would not act in accordance with and within the scope of its powers as indicated in the Constitution of India,” states the high court order.

The court held that the apex court in several judgements has held that Courts have very limited role with regard to judicial legislation since neither the Courts can legislate nor they have any competence to issue directions to the Legislature to enact a law in a particular manner. The court thus dismissed the petition for being devoid of merit.

The law on religious conversions has gained sudden popularity in recent times. Following the footsteps of Uttarakhand, other BJP ruled states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh passed such laws making religious conversion for the sake of marriage to be illegal. While other states like Odisha (1967), Arunachal Pradesh (1978), Chhattisgarh (2000), Gujarat (2003) and Jharkhand (2017) have laws against forceful conversion but these laws do not make conversion for marriage an offence.

It is quite peculiar that a petition such as this one has been filed since the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018 have been challenged before the Supreme Court and the UP ordinance alone has challenged before the Allahabad High Court on grounds that these laws place a burden on individuals to justify their personal decisions to the State authorities throttling their Right to Life and Personal Liberty, Dignity, Freedom of Conscience and Choice. Both petitions are pending hearings before the courts.

The order may be read here.

Related:

Allahabad High Court protects Mirzapur series makers from arrest

Why such exorbitant amounts sought in bonds and sureties from farmers: Allahabad HC asks State 

Love Jihad case: SC refuses to entertain UP Govt's plea to transfer petition from HC to SC 

Allahabad HC dismisses petition seeking central law on religious conversions

The court stated that directing legislatures to make laws does not come under its writ jurisdiction, as held by Supreme Court in the past

Anti conversion lawImage courtesy: The Economic Times
 

Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition seeking direction to the Centre to consider passing a law regulating religious conversion, like the one passed by Uttar Pradesh. The court dismissed the petition stating that under Article 226 (writ jurisdiction of High Courts) of the Constitution, the court is not empowered to issue such directions to the Legislature, for making any laws, owing to the doctrine of constitutional trust and separation of powers.

The bench comprising Justices Ritu Raj Swathi and Manish Mathur cited a Supreme Court judgement in Manoj Narula v. Union of India reported in (2014) 9 SCC 1 whereby the court had declared a similar petition to be not maintainable basis doctrine of constitutional trust which gives regard to separation of jurisdiction and powers of various constitutional functionaries and authorities. “The doctrine of constitutional trust clearly is with regard to the maxim Salus populi suprema lex esto (Let the good (or safety) of the people be the supreme law). It was held that it cannot be believed that a constitutional authority or functionary would not act in accordance with and within the scope of its powers as indicated in the Constitution of India,” states the high court order.

The court held that the apex court in several judgements has held that Courts have very limited role with regard to judicial legislation since neither the Courts can legislate nor they have any competence to issue directions to the Legislature to enact a law in a particular manner. The court thus dismissed the petition for being devoid of merit.

The law on religious conversions has gained sudden popularity in recent times. Following the footsteps of Uttarakhand, other BJP ruled states like Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Himachal Pradesh passed such laws making religious conversion for the sake of marriage to be illegal. While other states like Odisha (1967), Arunachal Pradesh (1978), Chhattisgarh (2000), Gujarat (2003) and Jharkhand (2017) have laws against forceful conversion but these laws do not make conversion for marriage an offence.

It is quite peculiar that a petition such as this one has been filed since the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018 have been challenged before the Supreme Court and the UP ordinance alone has challenged before the Allahabad High Court on grounds that these laws place a burden on individuals to justify their personal decisions to the State authorities throttling their Right to Life and Personal Liberty, Dignity, Freedom of Conscience and Choice. Both petitions are pending hearings before the courts.

The order may be read here.

Related:

Allahabad High Court protects Mirzapur series makers from arrest

Why such exorbitant amounts sought in bonds and sureties from farmers: Allahabad HC asks State 

Love Jihad case: SC refuses to entertain UP Govt's plea to transfer petition from HC to SC 

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Videos

Communalism

Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?

In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.

Communalism

Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?

In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.

IN FACT

Analysis

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Archives