Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Communalism Violence

Bhopal Encounter: Court had found Evidence 'not believable' in a Case related to 3 SIMI Men

Sabrang India Staff 05 Nov 2016
More than a year before the killing of eight SIMI activists in a purported encounter following a jailbreak in Bhopal, a Khandwa court had acquitted one of the undertrials in a 2011 case, and had held evidence in the 2011 case against three of them “not believable”, reported The Indian Express.

Khandwa court SIMI
Image credit: Patrika.com

In its judgement, the court had come down heavily upon Madhya Pradesh police and had acquitted Akeel Khilji, on September 30, 2015, who was booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), while the other two – Amzad Ramzan Khan and Mohammed Saliq were declared “proclaimed offenders” by then, according to the report. The court had reportedly questioned the jurisdiction of the investigation officer to carry out the probe under UAPA, and had slammed police for not sending key pieces of evidence for forensic analysis.
 
The court had also acquitted Abdullah – brother of Zakir Hussain who was also killed in Monday’s encounter, and Khilji’s son Mohammad Jaleel in the same case, who were booked under various sections of UAPA and IPC sections 153(A), pertaining to “promoting enmity between two groups”; 153(B) relating to imputations and assertions deemed harmful to national integration; and, 124 (A) on sedition.
 
The police chargesheet reportedly claimed that Khilji along with other few people had assembled at Khilji’s house to plan execution of a big attack in 2011. Police had purportedly raided his house to confiscate “SIMI literature” and CDs that were termed as “provocative”.
 
After a four-year trial, the Khandwa court had acquitted all the accused charged under the UAPA.
 
On purported SIMI literature and “provocative” CDs submitted by police, the court had ruled, “The evidence produced before the court is not clear whether it supports or contradicts the message and picture in the CD. There is no evidence to establish what was the message in the CD. In case of a book, especially objectionable text or conversation, if the entire context is laid out along with the evidence, then it cannot be concluded these are objectionable or provocative towards society, religion or nation. They might be provocative in nature, but the prosecution has not presented any clear evidence in this regard.”
 
The court had also observed that the investigating officer did not have sufficient powers to probe the case, according to the Express report.

The last rites of four of the eight SIMI activists killed this week were conducted in Khilji’s house in Khandwa on Thursday. Khilji had been awaiting trial in Bhopal’s Central Jail after being charged in at least three cases — two under the UAPA and another “for promoting enmity”.
 
For full story by The Indian Express, click here.
 
 

Bhopal Encounter: Court had found Evidence 'not believable' in a Case related to 3 SIMI Men

More than a year before the killing of eight SIMI activists in a purported encounter following a jailbreak in Bhopal, a Khandwa court had acquitted one of the undertrials in a 2011 case, and had held evidence in the 2011 case against three of them “not believable”, reported The Indian Express.

Khandwa court SIMI
Image credit: Patrika.com

In its judgement, the court had come down heavily upon Madhya Pradesh police and had acquitted Akeel Khilji, on September 30, 2015, who was booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), while the other two – Amzad Ramzan Khan and Mohammed Saliq were declared “proclaimed offenders” by then, according to the report. The court had reportedly questioned the jurisdiction of the investigation officer to carry out the probe under UAPA, and had slammed police for not sending key pieces of evidence for forensic analysis.
 
The court had also acquitted Abdullah – brother of Zakir Hussain who was also killed in Monday’s encounter, and Khilji’s son Mohammad Jaleel in the same case, who were booked under various sections of UAPA and IPC sections 153(A), pertaining to “promoting enmity between two groups”; 153(B) relating to imputations and assertions deemed harmful to national integration; and, 124 (A) on sedition.
 
The police chargesheet reportedly claimed that Khilji along with other few people had assembled at Khilji’s house to plan execution of a big attack in 2011. Police had purportedly raided his house to confiscate “SIMI literature” and CDs that were termed as “provocative”.
 
After a four-year trial, the Khandwa court had acquitted all the accused charged under the UAPA.
 
On purported SIMI literature and “provocative” CDs submitted by police, the court had ruled, “The evidence produced before the court is not clear whether it supports or contradicts the message and picture in the CD. There is no evidence to establish what was the message in the CD. In case of a book, especially objectionable text or conversation, if the entire context is laid out along with the evidence, then it cannot be concluded these are objectionable or provocative towards society, religion or nation. They might be provocative in nature, but the prosecution has not presented any clear evidence in this regard.”
 
The court had also observed that the investigating officer did not have sufficient powers to probe the case, according to the Express report.

The last rites of four of the eight SIMI activists killed this week were conducted in Khilji’s house in Khandwa on Thursday. Khilji had been awaiting trial in Bhopal’s Central Jail after being charged in at least three cases — two under the UAPA and another “for promoting enmity”.
 
For full story by The Indian Express, click here.
 
 

Related Articles

Monday

18

Nov

Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi

Saturday

30

Nov

Jana Natya Manch, New Delhi

Thursday

07

Nov

Thrissur, Kerala

Theme

Ayodhya 1992

Ayodhya 1992

Excerpts from the Report of the Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry
babri

How the Babri Masjid was demolished

Citizens Tribunal on Ayodhya
babri

Fact and Faith

Allahabad High Court Judgement in Babri Demolition Case, 2010
kashmir

How Green Is My Valley

The killing of innocent Hindus by Pakistan-trained mercenaries in J and K is one more bid to convert the Kashmiriyat issue into a Hindu-Muslim problem

Campaigns

Monday

18

Nov

Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi

Saturday

30

Nov

Jana Natya Manch, New Delhi

Thursday

07

Nov

12 am onwards

Vibgyor Film Collective

Thrissur, Kerala

Videos

Communalism

What is the Ram Temple REALLY about?

For the many who do not know what the original Ram Temple movement is and the many who may have forgotten the mayhem, eminent activist and journalist Teesta Setalvad presents a ready reckoner on what the Ram Temple movement really is about and why has it been so conveniently resurrected, twenty six years later in 2018.

Communalism

What is the Ram Temple REALLY about?

For the many who do not know what the original Ram Temple movement is and the many who may have forgotten the mayhem, eminent activist and journalist Teesta Setalvad presents a ready reckoner on what the Ram Temple movement really is about and why has it been so conveniently resurrected, twenty six years later in 2018.

Analysis

Ayodhya 1992

Ayodhya 1992

Excerpts from the Report of the Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry
babri

How the Babri Masjid was demolished

Citizens Tribunal on Ayodhya
babri

Fact and Faith

Allahabad High Court Judgement in Babri Demolition Case, 2010
kashmir

How Green Is My Valley

The killing of innocent Hindus by Pakistan-trained mercenaries in J and K is one more bid to convert the Kashmiriyat issue into a Hindu-Muslim problem

Archives