Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Rule of Law

Cannot intervene if adult marries as per choice and converts: Cal HC

The high court, in a bid to allay the suspicions of the girl’s father has directed that her statement be taken a 3rd time to ensure no influence or coercion

Sabrangindia 22 Dec 2020

Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court held that it cannot intervene if an adult marries as per her choice and decides to convert and not return to her paternal house. The two-judge bench of Justices Sanjib Banerjee and Arijit Banerjee passed an order dated December 21 while observing that a 19 year old girl married a person of her choice and does not want to return to her paternal home.

The father of the girl, the petitioner, had raised concerns that his daughter’s statement may not have been recorded in an atmosphere where she felt comfortable and hence, she was made to give her statement before the senior-most Additional District Judge and yet her statement remained the same. The court noted that the father still had his suspicions and hence ordered that the girl meets the Public Prosecutor in his chamber alone and directed the prosecutor to file a report before the court on December 24.

This statement made by the Calcutta High Court comes at a crucial time when courts are increasingly upholding an adult’s right to choose a partner for marriage irrespective of religion as also right of a person to convert even if it is solely for marriage. In both cases, it is a matter of choice and personal right. It appears that state legislatures are at loggerheads with their respective high courts in this matter. As Uttar Pradesh brought in the law against “forced religious conversion”, the Allahabad High Court upheld that “Right to live with a person of his/her choice irrespective of religion professed by them, is intrinsic to right to life and personal liberty. Interference in a personal relationship, would constitute a serious encroachment into the right to freedom of choice of the two individuals.”

Similarly, as Karnataka Assembly contemplates a law on similar lines as the UP law, the Karnataka High Court upheld the right of an adult to marry the person of his/her choice irrespective of caste or religion.

The Calcutta High Court order may be read here.

 

Related:

Love Jihad: Karnataka legislature vs. judiciary

UP Governor gives assent to anti-Love Jihad ordinance

Law against ‘Love Jihad’ or controlling our ‘individuality’

Cannot intervene if adult marries as per choice and converts: Cal HC

The high court, in a bid to allay the suspicions of the girl’s father has directed that her statement be taken a 3rd time to ensure no influence or coercion

Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court held that it cannot intervene if an adult marries as per her choice and decides to convert and not return to her paternal house. The two-judge bench of Justices Sanjib Banerjee and Arijit Banerjee passed an order dated December 21 while observing that a 19 year old girl married a person of her choice and does not want to return to her paternal home.

The father of the girl, the petitioner, had raised concerns that his daughter’s statement may not have been recorded in an atmosphere where she felt comfortable and hence, she was made to give her statement before the senior-most Additional District Judge and yet her statement remained the same. The court noted that the father still had his suspicions and hence ordered that the girl meets the Public Prosecutor in his chamber alone and directed the prosecutor to file a report before the court on December 24.

This statement made by the Calcutta High Court comes at a crucial time when courts are increasingly upholding an adult’s right to choose a partner for marriage irrespective of religion as also right of a person to convert even if it is solely for marriage. In both cases, it is a matter of choice and personal right. It appears that state legislatures are at loggerheads with their respective high courts in this matter. As Uttar Pradesh brought in the law against “forced religious conversion”, the Allahabad High Court upheld that “Right to live with a person of his/her choice irrespective of religion professed by them, is intrinsic to right to life and personal liberty. Interference in a personal relationship, would constitute a serious encroachment into the right to freedom of choice of the two individuals.”

Similarly, as Karnataka Assembly contemplates a law on similar lines as the UP law, the Karnataka High Court upheld the right of an adult to marry the person of his/her choice irrespective of caste or religion.

The Calcutta High Court order may be read here.

 

Related:

Love Jihad: Karnataka legislature vs. judiciary

UP Governor gives assent to anti-Love Jihad ordinance

Law against ‘Love Jihad’ or controlling our ‘individuality’

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Videos

Communalism

Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?

In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.

Communalism

Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?

In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.

IN FACT

Analysis

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Archives