Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Communalism Rule of Law

Delhi riots accused granted bail as eye witness account recorded after “humongous delay”

The court held that the accused should be granted bail on the ground of parity as well since other accused were released by Delhi High Court.

Sabrangindia 06 Feb 2021

Delhi riots

A Delhi Sessions court granted bail to a man accused of murder of an auto-driver during the Delhi riots while observing that statements of police and primary witnesses were recorded after considerable and unexplained delay.

The accused, Kuldeep Singh, was denied bail twice before, by this court, and this third bail application was filed since the two other accused in the case were granted bail by Delhi High Court and one other accused was granted bail by this court. The applicant/accused pleaded that he be granted bail on the ground of parity. Further, the applicant argues that he is a young 28-year-old married man with a minor daughter and is the sole bread earner of the family with ailing parents and dependent sisters. He contended that he has been falsely implicated in the case and has not been named in the FIR either. He further argued that he is not being seen in any CCTV footage, no recovery has been effected from him by the police. He also argued that the statements of the cops and other witnesses cannot be considered as authentic or reliable, as the same were recorded after a long gap of more than 80 days of the incident.

The prosecution argued that the case pertains to murder of an innocent auto-driver and since the applicant resides in the same area as the family of the deceased, there is possibility that the applicant might threaten the witnesses.

The court relied upon the Delhi High Court order granting bail to the other accused whereby the court had observed that the statement of the witnesses was recorded almost 2 months after the incident and deemed their statements to be unreliable since they submitted that they were present at the spot and saw the incident happening, yet they did not lodge any complaint neither did they make any calls to the Police Control room.

The Assistant Sessions Judge, Vinod Yadav of Karkardooma court, held that the statement of the primary eye witness in the case was recorded after a “humongous delay of 83 days” and the prosecution failed to accord any cogent explanation for this delay. The court observed that neither of the witnesses approached any police station nor made a call on 100 about the incident for so many days.

The court also addressed the identification of the application by the cops only in a supplementary statement recorded in May, while the incident took place in February. “Being police officials, what stopped them from reporting the matter then and there in the PS or to bring the same in the knowledge of higher police officers,” questioned the court. The court held that this casts a serious doubt on the credibility of the police witnesses as well.

“Admittedly, the applicant is neither visible in any CCTV footage nor he has been specifically named in the FIR,” states the order. The court granted bail to the applicant on ground of parity on his furnishing a Personal Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety of like amount; subject to conditions that he will not tamper with evidence, shall maintain peace and harmony in the locality and that he shall appear before the Court on each and every hearing and so on.

The complete order may be read here

 

Related:

Delhi Riots: 63-year-old accused gets bail from Delhi HC

Faizan police brutality case: Delhi HC directs police to file affidavit on working CCTV cameras

Delhi court denies bail to Devangana Kalita in UAPA case

Delhi riots accused granted bail as eye witness account recorded after “humongous delay”

The court held that the accused should be granted bail on the ground of parity as well since other accused were released by Delhi High Court.

Delhi riots

A Delhi Sessions court granted bail to a man accused of murder of an auto-driver during the Delhi riots while observing that statements of police and primary witnesses were recorded after considerable and unexplained delay.

The accused, Kuldeep Singh, was denied bail twice before, by this court, and this third bail application was filed since the two other accused in the case were granted bail by Delhi High Court and one other accused was granted bail by this court. The applicant/accused pleaded that he be granted bail on the ground of parity. Further, the applicant argues that he is a young 28-year-old married man with a minor daughter and is the sole bread earner of the family with ailing parents and dependent sisters. He contended that he has been falsely implicated in the case and has not been named in the FIR either. He further argued that he is not being seen in any CCTV footage, no recovery has been effected from him by the police. He also argued that the statements of the cops and other witnesses cannot be considered as authentic or reliable, as the same were recorded after a long gap of more than 80 days of the incident.

The prosecution argued that the case pertains to murder of an innocent auto-driver and since the applicant resides in the same area as the family of the deceased, there is possibility that the applicant might threaten the witnesses.

The court relied upon the Delhi High Court order granting bail to the other accused whereby the court had observed that the statement of the witnesses was recorded almost 2 months after the incident and deemed their statements to be unreliable since they submitted that they were present at the spot and saw the incident happening, yet they did not lodge any complaint neither did they make any calls to the Police Control room.

The Assistant Sessions Judge, Vinod Yadav of Karkardooma court, held that the statement of the primary eye witness in the case was recorded after a “humongous delay of 83 days” and the prosecution failed to accord any cogent explanation for this delay. The court observed that neither of the witnesses approached any police station nor made a call on 100 about the incident for so many days.

The court also addressed the identification of the application by the cops only in a supplementary statement recorded in May, while the incident took place in February. “Being police officials, what stopped them from reporting the matter then and there in the PS or to bring the same in the knowledge of higher police officers,” questioned the court. The court held that this casts a serious doubt on the credibility of the police witnesses as well.

“Admittedly, the applicant is neither visible in any CCTV footage nor he has been specifically named in the FIR,” states the order. The court granted bail to the applicant on ground of parity on his furnishing a Personal Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety of like amount; subject to conditions that he will not tamper with evidence, shall maintain peace and harmony in the locality and that he shall appear before the Court on each and every hearing and so on.

The complete order may be read here

 

Related:

Delhi Riots: 63-year-old accused gets bail from Delhi HC

Faizan police brutality case: Delhi HC directs police to file affidavit on working CCTV cameras

Delhi court denies bail to Devangana Kalita in UAPA case

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Videos

Communalism

Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?

In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.

Communalism

Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?

In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.

IN FACT

Analysis

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Archives