Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom Rule of Law

Delhi violence: Jailed activist Gulfisha Fatima accuses Delhi Police of diversionary tactics

This comes in the backdrop of the prosecution raising the issue of maintainability of bail plea filed by co-accused Ishrat Jahan in the same case

Sabrangindia 16 Sep 2021

UAPAImage Courtesy:livelaw.in

Gulfisha Fatima, the student-activist booked under the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, for her alleged role in the February 2020 violence has applied for regular bail before the district court in Delhi.

During her hearing today, on September 16, the Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat informed Fatima’s counsel Mehmood Pracha that the Delhi Police has challenged lawyer-activist and co-accused Ishrat Jahan’s bail application. Additional Public Prosecutor, Amit Prasad (appearing for Delhi Police) has argued before the court that Jahan’s bail application was not maintainable because it was filed under section 439 (Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail) of the Criminal Procedure Code whereas, the special court can only hear cases filed under section 437, which deals with the provisions of when bail matters may be taken up in case of a non-bailable offence.

Following this, co-accused Umar Khalid and Khalid Saifi, withdrew their bail pleas and filed fresh applications under section 437. Other accused persons, Meeran Haider and Shifa-ur-Rehman, have raised similar concerns before the court, whether they are expected to withdraw their pleas and file fresh ones.

In this backdrop, today the Indian Express reported that when the court informed Pracha about the developments, he argued, “When personal liberty is involved nomenclature is not important!” He accused the prosecution of indulging in diversionary tactics and said, “This Court has the power to take cognisance as a special court as well as the powers of a sessions court. Section 16(3) of NIA Act has the power under section 439 CrPC as well as other powers under CrPC.”

He added, “You [ASJ Amitabh Rawat] should take this seriously. Are you a session judge or a special judge for them now? How are they approaching you then? If they go into technicalities they will land in a big soup. How are they remembering now that you are a special judge?” He reportedly argued that the chargesheet in the case was filed before the court while exercising power as a sessions judge and not a special judge, and therefore, the Delhi Police was not in a position to approach the court by challenging maintainability at this the stage of regular bail.

In the last hearing of the UAPA case in FIR 59 of 2020, Judge Amitabh Rawat had said that he might have to adjudicate on this issue and rule whether a bail plea under UAPA can be filed under section 439 of CrPC or not. As we have previously reported in SabrangIndia, he had said, “I think they (prosecution) are going to take it. Whether or not it is written, since they have taken it in one case. The difficulty is that some co- accused have withdrawn 439 and filed fresh 437 [applications]….and some are agitating under section 439, so I will have to give a finding to avoid confusion, and this will keep angering the accused because what to do…”

Besides Mehmood Pracha, Umar Khalid and Ishrat Jahan’s lawyers have also accused the Delhi Police of delaying the trial without any basis. Advocate Pradeep Teotia, representing Jahan had argued that the Prosecution was deriving sadistic pleasure to keep her incarcerated in the case. Senior counsel Trideep Pais, on behalf of Umar Khalid had also said that the Police was using dilatory tactics against him.

Gulfisha’s bail application will now be taken up on September 18.

Related:

Delhi violence: What is happening in case involving the conspiracy FIR under UAPA?
Umar Khalid files fresh bail plea, opposes State’s “dilatory tactics”
State is deriving sadistic pleasure by extending custody period, its torture: Ishrat Jahan

Delhi violence: Jailed activist Gulfisha Fatima accuses Delhi Police of diversionary tactics

This comes in the backdrop of the prosecution raising the issue of maintainability of bail plea filed by co-accused Ishrat Jahan in the same case

UAPAImage Courtesy:livelaw.in

Gulfisha Fatima, the student-activist booked under the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, for her alleged role in the February 2020 violence has applied for regular bail before the district court in Delhi.

During her hearing today, on September 16, the Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat informed Fatima’s counsel Mehmood Pracha that the Delhi Police has challenged lawyer-activist and co-accused Ishrat Jahan’s bail application. Additional Public Prosecutor, Amit Prasad (appearing for Delhi Police) has argued before the court that Jahan’s bail application was not maintainable because it was filed under section 439 (Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail) of the Criminal Procedure Code whereas, the special court can only hear cases filed under section 437, which deals with the provisions of when bail matters may be taken up in case of a non-bailable offence.

Following this, co-accused Umar Khalid and Khalid Saifi, withdrew their bail pleas and filed fresh applications under section 437. Other accused persons, Meeran Haider and Shifa-ur-Rehman, have raised similar concerns before the court, whether they are expected to withdraw their pleas and file fresh ones.

In this backdrop, today the Indian Express reported that when the court informed Pracha about the developments, he argued, “When personal liberty is involved nomenclature is not important!” He accused the prosecution of indulging in diversionary tactics and said, “This Court has the power to take cognisance as a special court as well as the powers of a sessions court. Section 16(3) of NIA Act has the power under section 439 CrPC as well as other powers under CrPC.”

He added, “You [ASJ Amitabh Rawat] should take this seriously. Are you a session judge or a special judge for them now? How are they approaching you then? If they go into technicalities they will land in a big soup. How are they remembering now that you are a special judge?” He reportedly argued that the chargesheet in the case was filed before the court while exercising power as a sessions judge and not a special judge, and therefore, the Delhi Police was not in a position to approach the court by challenging maintainability at this the stage of regular bail.

In the last hearing of the UAPA case in FIR 59 of 2020, Judge Amitabh Rawat had said that he might have to adjudicate on this issue and rule whether a bail plea under UAPA can be filed under section 439 of CrPC or not. As we have previously reported in SabrangIndia, he had said, “I think they (prosecution) are going to take it. Whether or not it is written, since they have taken it in one case. The difficulty is that some co- accused have withdrawn 439 and filed fresh 437 [applications]….and some are agitating under section 439, so I will have to give a finding to avoid confusion, and this will keep angering the accused because what to do…”

Besides Mehmood Pracha, Umar Khalid and Ishrat Jahan’s lawyers have also accused the Delhi Police of delaying the trial without any basis. Advocate Pradeep Teotia, representing Jahan had argued that the Prosecution was deriving sadistic pleasure to keep her incarcerated in the case. Senior counsel Trideep Pais, on behalf of Umar Khalid had also said that the Police was using dilatory tactics against him.

Gulfisha’s bail application will now be taken up on September 18.

Related:

Delhi violence: What is happening in case involving the conspiracy FIR under UAPA?
Umar Khalid files fresh bail plea, opposes State’s “dilatory tactics”
State is deriving sadistic pleasure by extending custody period, its torture: Ishrat Jahan

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Archives