Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Women

FIR against Goa professor for ‘outraging religious beliefs'

The case was filed on a complaint by Rajiv Jha, of Rashtriya Hindu Yuva Vahini's Goa unit

Sabrangindia 10 Nov 2020

Image Courtesy:indianexpress.com

An assistant professor at a Goa law college is the latest target of the right wing onslaught on free speech. Shipla Singh, has been named in a first information report (FIR) filed by one Rajiv Jha, who is affiliated with the Goa unit of a group named Rashtriya Hindu Yuva Vahini. The Indian Express reported that an FIR was registered on Monday, November 9, accusing Shilpa Singh of allegedly outraging religious beliefs with deliberate and malicious intention. 

Jha referred to an April 21 Facebook post by Singh, who teaches Political Science at Panaji’s VM Salgaocar College of Law, in which she had questioned patriarchy by reportedly comparing ‘mangalsutra’,  worn by married women, to a “chained dog”. Singh has also approached the police for purportedly abusive and threatening messages she is receiving after “Jha’s [social media] abusive post on October 30”.

According to the news report, the college had already sent a written response to a complaint against Singh by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student outfit of RSS, stating that it does not have a “locus standi” to raise objections about her teaching, and that no termination order will be issued against her. The ABVP had complained that Singh promotes “socially hateful thoughts about a particular religion” and had sought her termination from the college. 

North Goa SP Utkrisht Prasoon was quoted by IE stating that FIRs have been registered on the basis of complaints by both Jha and Singh, “Shilpa Singh has been booked under IPC Section 295-A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings). Rajiv Jha, a resident of Ponda, has been booked under IPC Sections 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 509 (insulting modesty of woman).”

Meanwhile Jha told The Indian Express that, “After ABVP’s complaint, I saw this April 21 post of her on Facebook and got angry. I first approached Panaji police on October 28 and in a written note asked that she should seek public apology. Since they (police) didn’t react…we again went with a new complaint the next day [October 29).” 

Jha identified himself as a “practicing Hindu Brahmin” and said, “If she has thoughts (on religion), she should keep it to herself, and not publicise on social media. She is a professor; if this is what she writes here, (I) wonder what she must be teaching her students.” Jha has also put up a video calling the professor “hindu phobic” and accusing her of insulting hindus. “Mangalsutra is an auspicious thing for Sanatan dharma, what the hell is she saying, what is she trying to teach? She is insulting hindu gods and goddesses in her social media posts”. 

He said, “We have complained against her at the police station. She must apologise. I request the CM, DIG to take strict action.” He told IE that he could have “gone directly to the college and sought action,” but has not as she is a “woman.” He also claimed to have “open support” of the Rashtriya Hindu Yuva Vahini, the women’s wing of the outfit, Parshuram Gomantak Sena, and Brahmin Parishad.

However, asst prof Singh has called the allegation a “witch hunt”. According to an IE report  she had written to the chancellor’s nominee, executive council, Goa University [or the Governor], and  raised doubts as Jha filed a complaint six months after her Facebook post, and around the time her college refused to entertain ABVP’s demands to sack her.

The IE quotes her letter: “As education is not merely rote learning, I try my best to impart critical tools necessary for students of political science to understand and analyse the complexities, contradictions and emergent power relations animating the realm of politics in the world. As a teacher, I would not be fulfilling my duty, if I teach them in a sterile manner without enriching my students with real life examples that supplement the theoretical content of their source…I suspect that having failed at intimidating me at my workplace and having failed to humiliate me by getting me sacked, the present day demand for FIR and police action against me on account of my opinion on social media is just another ploy in the course of a conspiracy to defame, humiliate and break me down.”

The report added that hours before Jha’s FIR was lodged, Singh had apologised on Facebook, stating that her words from the post were clipped and taken out of context. “…I wish to express my regret to my fellow women if any of my facebook posts have caused them hurt and offended them…. Since my childhood, I have been curious about why we have exclusive marital status symbols for women and not for the men in various cultures practices. It is depressing to see that a false opinion has been created about myself by my detractors – that I am an ‘anti-religion’ or a run-of-the-mill ‘god-hating atheist’. This is far from the truth… I see myself as an intellectual and for me, my criticism of a set of practices and dogma has little to do with my disdain or irreverence for religion or religious believers but more to do with the inherent symbolism they represent in the political and civil society of our country historically.”

According to a news report on Rediff, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, the student wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh,  had sent a two-page letter addressed to the principal of V M Salgaocar College of Law on October 19. It was titled: 'Instant Termination of Professor Shilpa Singh, a 31-year Goa University doctorate student who teaches political science to the students of V M Salgaoncar College of Law at Miramar, Goa'.

The ABVP accused professor Singh with 'promoting socially hateful thoughts about a particular religion, community and group of individuals', following an online lecture conducted by her. The Rashtriya Yuva Hindu Vahini is now citing this letter to add fuel to its ‘sacred mangalsutra’ arguments.

The professor, who has been teaching at V M Salgaoncar College of Law since June 2019, has refused to be intimidated. She told Rediff.com that in her online lecture she was discussing Rohith Vemula and Manusmriti, and the video snippets were selectively leaked to target her,  "The leaked video is just a snippet, not the entire lecture recording. If the entire recording is released they will be caught because then everybody will come to know it was spoken in a context. But the interesting thing is these people so far are not ready to submit the evidence or give concrete instances of what comprised hate speech in my lectures," Professor Singh told Rediff.

According to Singh she was  discussing the adultery law in India (which was struck down last year by the Supreme Court) “In that context I just said if they understood the feminist perspective on such laws then it would enrich their understanding of why such anti-women legislation have been enforced for a fairly long period of time. At that time I gave the reference of the Manusmriti and how this law had many limitations to the freedom of women.”

She added that the discussions about Rohith Vemula came about when she was talking about “conservative political thought and critical political thought that comes within the purview of the nature of political thought. While discussing this we moved to Aristotle's view on slavery, which was a bit heavy on them. Then I told them about Gandhi and Ambedkar and that Gandhi because of his views on caste is labelled a conservative political thinker, but when it comes to caste Ambedkar is considered a critical political thinker.” Then the discussion eventually moved on and she asked them if they had heard about Rohith Vemula, “ I was explaining to them how the caste system is dead today Constitutionally, but socially it still exists in different parts of India. In this context I gave the example of Rohith Vemula because he said 'My birth is my fatal accident',” she told Rediff.

Prof Singh has also altered the local police station near her home and sought “personal protection that I feel is necessary for my safety and security” added the news report.

Related

No dignity even in death for Dalits
Aakar Patel arrested, then bailed for three tweets on Modi, BJP-RSS & Ghanchi Caste: 
AISA member attacked in hostel by a mob of 14-16 people
JNU violence must be investigated by a judicial commission
Student activist Safoora Zargar, denied bail, judicial custody extended till June 25
JMIU students asked to sign declaration that says police didn’t enter hostel

FIR against Goa professor for ‘outraging religious beliefs'

The case was filed on a complaint by Rajiv Jha, of Rashtriya Hindu Yuva Vahini's Goa unit

Image Courtesy:indianexpress.com

An assistant professor at a Goa law college is the latest target of the right wing onslaught on free speech. Shipla Singh, has been named in a first information report (FIR) filed by one Rajiv Jha, who is affiliated with the Goa unit of a group named Rashtriya Hindu Yuva Vahini. The Indian Express reported that an FIR was registered on Monday, November 9, accusing Shilpa Singh of allegedly outraging religious beliefs with deliberate and malicious intention. 

Jha referred to an April 21 Facebook post by Singh, who teaches Political Science at Panaji’s VM Salgaocar College of Law, in which she had questioned patriarchy by reportedly comparing ‘mangalsutra’,  worn by married women, to a “chained dog”. Singh has also approached the police for purportedly abusive and threatening messages she is receiving after “Jha’s [social media] abusive post on October 30”.

According to the news report, the college had already sent a written response to a complaint against Singh by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student outfit of RSS, stating that it does not have a “locus standi” to raise objections about her teaching, and that no termination order will be issued against her. The ABVP had complained that Singh promotes “socially hateful thoughts about a particular religion” and had sought her termination from the college. 

North Goa SP Utkrisht Prasoon was quoted by IE stating that FIRs have been registered on the basis of complaints by both Jha and Singh, “Shilpa Singh has been booked under IPC Section 295-A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings). Rajiv Jha, a resident of Ponda, has been booked under IPC Sections 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 509 (insulting modesty of woman).”

Meanwhile Jha told The Indian Express that, “After ABVP’s complaint, I saw this April 21 post of her on Facebook and got angry. I first approached Panaji police on October 28 and in a written note asked that she should seek public apology. Since they (police) didn’t react…we again went with a new complaint the next day [October 29).” 

Jha identified himself as a “practicing Hindu Brahmin” and said, “If she has thoughts (on religion), she should keep it to herself, and not publicise on social media. She is a professor; if this is what she writes here, (I) wonder what she must be teaching her students.” Jha has also put up a video calling the professor “hindu phobic” and accusing her of insulting hindus. “Mangalsutra is an auspicious thing for Sanatan dharma, what the hell is she saying, what is she trying to teach? She is insulting hindu gods and goddesses in her social media posts”. 

He said, “We have complained against her at the police station. She must apologise. I request the CM, DIG to take strict action.” He told IE that he could have “gone directly to the college and sought action,” but has not as she is a “woman.” He also claimed to have “open support” of the Rashtriya Hindu Yuva Vahini, the women’s wing of the outfit, Parshuram Gomantak Sena, and Brahmin Parishad.

However, asst prof Singh has called the allegation a “witch hunt”. According to an IE report  she had written to the chancellor’s nominee, executive council, Goa University [or the Governor], and  raised doubts as Jha filed a complaint six months after her Facebook post, and around the time her college refused to entertain ABVP’s demands to sack her.

The IE quotes her letter: “As education is not merely rote learning, I try my best to impart critical tools necessary for students of political science to understand and analyse the complexities, contradictions and emergent power relations animating the realm of politics in the world. As a teacher, I would not be fulfilling my duty, if I teach them in a sterile manner without enriching my students with real life examples that supplement the theoretical content of their source…I suspect that having failed at intimidating me at my workplace and having failed to humiliate me by getting me sacked, the present day demand for FIR and police action against me on account of my opinion on social media is just another ploy in the course of a conspiracy to defame, humiliate and break me down.”

The report added that hours before Jha’s FIR was lodged, Singh had apologised on Facebook, stating that her words from the post were clipped and taken out of context. “…I wish to express my regret to my fellow women if any of my facebook posts have caused them hurt and offended them…. Since my childhood, I have been curious about why we have exclusive marital status symbols for women and not for the men in various cultures practices. It is depressing to see that a false opinion has been created about myself by my detractors – that I am an ‘anti-religion’ or a run-of-the-mill ‘god-hating atheist’. This is far from the truth… I see myself as an intellectual and for me, my criticism of a set of practices and dogma has little to do with my disdain or irreverence for religion or religious believers but more to do with the inherent symbolism they represent in the political and civil society of our country historically.”

According to a news report on Rediff, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, the student wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh,  had sent a two-page letter addressed to the principal of V M Salgaocar College of Law on October 19. It was titled: 'Instant Termination of Professor Shilpa Singh, a 31-year Goa University doctorate student who teaches political science to the students of V M Salgaoncar College of Law at Miramar, Goa'.

The ABVP accused professor Singh with 'promoting socially hateful thoughts about a particular religion, community and group of individuals', following an online lecture conducted by her. The Rashtriya Yuva Hindu Vahini is now citing this letter to add fuel to its ‘sacred mangalsutra’ arguments.

The professor, who has been teaching at V M Salgaoncar College of Law since June 2019, has refused to be intimidated. She told Rediff.com that in her online lecture she was discussing Rohith Vemula and Manusmriti, and the video snippets were selectively leaked to target her,  "The leaked video is just a snippet, not the entire lecture recording. If the entire recording is released they will be caught because then everybody will come to know it was spoken in a context. But the interesting thing is these people so far are not ready to submit the evidence or give concrete instances of what comprised hate speech in my lectures," Professor Singh told Rediff.

According to Singh she was  discussing the adultery law in India (which was struck down last year by the Supreme Court) “In that context I just said if they understood the feminist perspective on such laws then it would enrich their understanding of why such anti-women legislation have been enforced for a fairly long period of time. At that time I gave the reference of the Manusmriti and how this law had many limitations to the freedom of women.”

She added that the discussions about Rohith Vemula came about when she was talking about “conservative political thought and critical political thought that comes within the purview of the nature of political thought. While discussing this we moved to Aristotle's view on slavery, which was a bit heavy on them. Then I told them about Gandhi and Ambedkar and that Gandhi because of his views on caste is labelled a conservative political thinker, but when it comes to caste Ambedkar is considered a critical political thinker.” Then the discussion eventually moved on and she asked them if they had heard about Rohith Vemula, “ I was explaining to them how the caste system is dead today Constitutionally, but socially it still exists in different parts of India. In this context I gave the example of Rohith Vemula because he said 'My birth is my fatal accident',” she told Rediff.

Prof Singh has also altered the local police station near her home and sought “personal protection that I feel is necessary for my safety and security” added the news report.

Related

No dignity even in death for Dalits
Aakar Patel arrested, then bailed for three tweets on Modi, BJP-RSS & Ghanchi Caste: 
AISA member attacked in hostel by a mob of 14-16 people
JNU violence must be investigated by a judicial commission
Student activist Safoora Zargar, denied bail, judicial custody extended till June 25
JMIU students asked to sign declaration that says police didn’t enter hostel

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Archives