Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom Politics

"Govt's actions in J&K attract charge of 'military rule"

11 Apr 2019

Open letter to Union Home Minister by former govt servants, academics, analysts and activists 


Rajnath Singh

Honourable Home Minister,

I am taking the liberty of sending you an open letter on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir written by a group pf academics, retired civil servants and analysts. The letter is attached, but I have also put the full text below.

We would be grateful if you could spare a moment to read our letter and if possible, respond to it.

Yours truly,

Radha Kumar
former member of the Group of Interlocutors for Jammu and Kashmir

----------

To:     Shri Rajnath Singh
        Honourable Home Minister of India


Dear Home Minister,

We, a group of former government servants, academics, analysts and civil society, many of whom have been associated with Jammu and Kashmir in our individual or official capacities, write to express our deep distress at the continuing and indeed intensifying alienation of Kashmiris from the rest of India. The decision to close the highway to civilian traffic twice a week, and to let it be used only by the forces until the election is concluded, undercuts our democratic credentials and attracts the charge of military rule. It is, moreover, only the most recent of a series of actions that add to disaffection in the valley. Others include banning the JKLF and the Jamaat e Islami, imprisoning their leaders as well as those of the Hurriyat, and denying security to members of political parties.

In these conditions, what kind of a turnout can we expect in the valley? Taken together, the policy of President’s rule, counter-insurgency, crackdowns and arrests, combined with threats to rollback Articles 370 and 35A and alterations to the administrative structure of the state, provide formidable disincentives to vote.

Yet the people of Jammu and Kashmir desperately need to vote – and vote convincingly – for the valley to emerge from its current state of confrontation and siege. Kashmir needs a government that can hold out hope instead of hatred, one that will work to re-establish peace on the ground. These steps will only be taken by an elected government, as the harsh measures that have been taken under President’s rule indicate.

Even at this late stage, your Ministry can minimize the disincentives for Kashmiris to vote. The first step would be to rescind orders for closure of the highway, followed by release of those arrested (unless there is substantive evidence of their being involved in recent terrorist attacks such as on the CRPF at Pulwama), restoration of security to political leaders and return to a policy of defense against attack rather than preemptive action. If your government could initiate a Ramzan ceasefire, then why not one for elections?

It took fifteen years of hard work for Jammu and Kashmir to emerge from the dark days of the 1990s. As the sharp fall in violence between 2005-2012 showed, the most hopeful period for Jammu and Kashmir was when there was a peace process in the state, starting in 2000. Though terrorists made strenuous efforts to disrupt it with high profile attacks, including on Hurriyat members, to which the Vajpayee and Singh administrations responded both militarily and diplomatically,
neither allowed terrorists to bring the peace process to a grinding halt.

In the past four years, most of the hard work of the previous fifteen years has been undone, for reasons that remain unknown because no reasoned explanation has been offered. These elections offer an opportunity to craft a more  conciliatory policy towards the people of the state, including dissidents who have engaged in peace initiatives, such as the Hurriyat M, who have once again held out an offer of talks.

Judging by its election manifesto, the BJP is opposed to conciliation in Jammu and Kashmir. Nevertheless, whether your party wishes to avail of this opportunity or not, surely you would recognize that governance is larger than party interest and a change of course is required, lest the situation in the state worsens to a point of no return. We urge you, even at this late stage, to take the steps mentioned above. Jammu and Kashmir will only then be able to have a free and fair election.

Signed:
1.      Salahuddin Ahmed, former Chief Secretary of Rajasthan
2.      Madhu Bhandari, former Ambassador of India to Belarus, Lithuania and Portugal
3.      Sundar Burra, former Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra
4.      Nitin Desai, former Secretary & CEA Ministry of Finance
5.      MG Devasahayam, IAS (retd)
6.      Gourisankar Ghosh, former Executive Director, UN WSSCC, Geneva
7.      Meena Gupta, former Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests
8.      Sajjad Hassan, former Secretary to the Government of Manipur
9.      Happymon Jacob, Professor of International Relations, Jawaharlal Nehru University
10.     Prem Shankar Jha, author and columnist
11.     Kapil Kak, former Air Vice-Marshal of India
12.     Radha Kumar, former member, GOI’s Group of Interlocutors for Jammu and Kashmir
13.     Satish Kumar, former Professor of Diplomacy, Jawaharlal Nehru University
14.     Sudhir Kumar, former member, Central Administrative Tribunal
15.     Seema Mustafa, Centre for Policy Analysis
16.     Nagalsamy, former Principal Accountant General, Tamil Nadu & Kerala
17.     Amitabh Pande, former Secretary to the Government of India
18.     Gopal Pillai, former Home Secretary of India
19.     Badri Raina, author and columnist
20.     Anand Sahay, columnist and commentator
21.     Deepak Sanan, IAS (retd)
22.     Karan Sawnhy, International Centre for Peace Initiatives
23.     Aftab Seth, former Ambassador of India to Japan
24.     Hindal Tyabji, former Chief Secretary of Jammu and Kashmir
25.     Ravi Vira, former Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India
26.     Shiv Vishwanathan, Professor of Social Sciences, OP Jindal University


April 8, 2019

"Govt's actions in J&K attract charge of 'military rule"

Open letter to Union Home Minister by former govt servants, academics, analysts and activists 


Rajnath Singh

Honourable Home Minister,

I am taking the liberty of sending you an open letter on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir written by a group pf academics, retired civil servants and analysts. The letter is attached, but I have also put the full text below.

We would be grateful if you could spare a moment to read our letter and if possible, respond to it.

Yours truly,

Radha Kumar
former member of the Group of Interlocutors for Jammu and Kashmir

----------

To:     Shri Rajnath Singh
        Honourable Home Minister of India


Dear Home Minister,

We, a group of former government servants, academics, analysts and civil society, many of whom have been associated with Jammu and Kashmir in our individual or official capacities, write to express our deep distress at the continuing and indeed intensifying alienation of Kashmiris from the rest of India. The decision to close the highway to civilian traffic twice a week, and to let it be used only by the forces until the election is concluded, undercuts our democratic credentials and attracts the charge of military rule. It is, moreover, only the most recent of a series of actions that add to disaffection in the valley. Others include banning the JKLF and the Jamaat e Islami, imprisoning their leaders as well as those of the Hurriyat, and denying security to members of political parties.

In these conditions, what kind of a turnout can we expect in the valley? Taken together, the policy of President’s rule, counter-insurgency, crackdowns and arrests, combined with threats to rollback Articles 370 and 35A and alterations to the administrative structure of the state, provide formidable disincentives to vote.

Yet the people of Jammu and Kashmir desperately need to vote – and vote convincingly – for the valley to emerge from its current state of confrontation and siege. Kashmir needs a government that can hold out hope instead of hatred, one that will work to re-establish peace on the ground. These steps will only be taken by an elected government, as the harsh measures that have been taken under President’s rule indicate.

Even at this late stage, your Ministry can minimize the disincentives for Kashmiris to vote. The first step would be to rescind orders for closure of the highway, followed by release of those arrested (unless there is substantive evidence of their being involved in recent terrorist attacks such as on the CRPF at Pulwama), restoration of security to political leaders and return to a policy of defense against attack rather than preemptive action. If your government could initiate a Ramzan ceasefire, then why not one for elections?

It took fifteen years of hard work for Jammu and Kashmir to emerge from the dark days of the 1990s. As the sharp fall in violence between 2005-2012 showed, the most hopeful period for Jammu and Kashmir was when there was a peace process in the state, starting in 2000. Though terrorists made strenuous efforts to disrupt it with high profile attacks, including on Hurriyat members, to which the Vajpayee and Singh administrations responded both militarily and diplomatically,
neither allowed terrorists to bring the peace process to a grinding halt.

In the past four years, most of the hard work of the previous fifteen years has been undone, for reasons that remain unknown because no reasoned explanation has been offered. These elections offer an opportunity to craft a more  conciliatory policy towards the people of the state, including dissidents who have engaged in peace initiatives, such as the Hurriyat M, who have once again held out an offer of talks.

Judging by its election manifesto, the BJP is opposed to conciliation in Jammu and Kashmir. Nevertheless, whether your party wishes to avail of this opportunity or not, surely you would recognize that governance is larger than party interest and a change of course is required, lest the situation in the state worsens to a point of no return. We urge you, even at this late stage, to take the steps mentioned above. Jammu and Kashmir will only then be able to have a free and fair election.

Signed:
1.      Salahuddin Ahmed, former Chief Secretary of Rajasthan
2.      Madhu Bhandari, former Ambassador of India to Belarus, Lithuania and Portugal
3.      Sundar Burra, former Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra
4.      Nitin Desai, former Secretary & CEA Ministry of Finance
5.      MG Devasahayam, IAS (retd)
6.      Gourisankar Ghosh, former Executive Director, UN WSSCC, Geneva
7.      Meena Gupta, former Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests
8.      Sajjad Hassan, former Secretary to the Government of Manipur
9.      Happymon Jacob, Professor of International Relations, Jawaharlal Nehru University
10.     Prem Shankar Jha, author and columnist
11.     Kapil Kak, former Air Vice-Marshal of India
12.     Radha Kumar, former member, GOI’s Group of Interlocutors for Jammu and Kashmir
13.     Satish Kumar, former Professor of Diplomacy, Jawaharlal Nehru University
14.     Sudhir Kumar, former member, Central Administrative Tribunal
15.     Seema Mustafa, Centre for Policy Analysis
16.     Nagalsamy, former Principal Accountant General, Tamil Nadu & Kerala
17.     Amitabh Pande, former Secretary to the Government of India
18.     Gopal Pillai, former Home Secretary of India
19.     Badri Raina, author and columnist
20.     Anand Sahay, columnist and commentator
21.     Deepak Sanan, IAS (retd)
22.     Karan Sawnhy, International Centre for Peace Initiatives
23.     Aftab Seth, former Ambassador of India to Japan
24.     Hindal Tyabji, former Chief Secretary of Jammu and Kashmir
25.     Ravi Vira, former Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India
26.     Shiv Vishwanathan, Professor of Social Sciences, OP Jindal University


April 8, 2019

Related Articles

Monday

18

Nov

Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi

Saturday

30

Nov

Jana Natya Manch, New Delhi

Thursday

07

Nov

Thrissur, Kerala

Theme

Ayodhya 1992

Ayodhya 1992

Excerpts from the Report of the Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry
babri

How the Babri Masjid was demolished

Citizens Tribunal on Ayodhya
babri

Fact and Faith

Allahabad High Court Judgement in Babri Demolition Case, 2010
kashmir

How Green Is My Valley

The killing of innocent Hindus by Pakistan-trained mercenaries in J and K is one more bid to convert the Kashmiriyat issue into a Hindu-Muslim problem

Campaigns

Monday

18

Nov

Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi

Saturday

30

Nov

Jana Natya Manch, New Delhi

Thursday

07

Nov

12 am onwards

Vibgyor Film Collective

Thrissur, Kerala

Videos

Communalism

What is the Ram Temple REALLY about?

For the many who do not know what the original Ram Temple movement is and the many who may have forgotten the mayhem, eminent activist and journalist Teesta Setalvad presents a ready reckoner on what the Ram Temple movement really is about and why has it been so conveniently resurrected, twenty six years later in 2018.

Communalism

What is the Ram Temple REALLY about?

For the many who do not know what the original Ram Temple movement is and the many who may have forgotten the mayhem, eminent activist and journalist Teesta Setalvad presents a ready reckoner on what the Ram Temple movement really is about and why has it been so conveniently resurrected, twenty six years later in 2018.

Analysis

Ayodhya 1992

Ayodhya 1992

Excerpts from the Report of the Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry
babri

How the Babri Masjid was demolished

Citizens Tribunal on Ayodhya
babri

Fact and Faith

Allahabad High Court Judgement in Babri Demolition Case, 2010
kashmir

How Green Is My Valley

The killing of innocent Hindus by Pakistan-trained mercenaries in J and K is one more bid to convert the Kashmiriyat issue into a Hindu-Muslim problem

Archives