Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Rule of Law

Guj HC points out “rampant misuse” of PASA Act

The court said that this was one of the examples where the police took on the responsibility to settle financial disputes between parties

Sabrangindia 06 Apr 2021

PASA ACt

Gujarat High Court has pre-emptively stalled the execution of detention order under Prevention of Anti- Social Activities (PASA) Act while observing that there has been a rampant misuse of the law. The bench of Justice Paresh Upadhyay observed that it was a private dispute between the parties but the police had still filed the FIR and deemed the petitioner, Rohitbhai Luni, to be a ‘dangerous person’ under PASA and intended to detain him.

The counsel for the petitioner, Shakeel Kureshi submitted that the dispute is private in nature and under no circumstances can it be brought under definition of “dangerous person” under PASA. The petitioner sought protection from detention under PASA.

The court perused the complaint and observed that it was a private dispute between the parties. The court further stated that the complainant had resorted to arm twisting with the aid of the police who had readily filed the FIR.

The court observed, “Such tactics need to be nipped in the bud. Rampant misuse of PASA is noticed by this court. This is one of such examples, where it is the police authorities who take upon such responsibility to settle the financial transaction / disputes between the parties, with the aid / threat of PASA.”

The court held that even if the petitioner may or may not be protected in the crimes registered under IPC, he cannot be termed as a dangerous person under PASA.

The court’s attention was also brought to another case where a woman was forced to remain in jail for two months after being detained under PASA after which the court set aside the detention order in February.

The detaining authority had not passed any detention order as yet, but the authority had submitted that it did intend to send the proposal to detain the petitioner under PASA. Thus, the court directed that if any such detention order is passed against the petitioner on the basis of this FIR, the same shall not be executed for period of one month from the date of service.

In August 2020 as well the Gujarat High Court had reprimanded the police as they had deemed the petitioner to be a ‘dangerous person’ under PASA for not wearing a mask and for having an altercation with the police.

The complete order may be read here:

 

Related:

Protect arrestee’s human rights: Lawyers send open letter to UNHRC

SC reserves order in Gautam Navlakha’s plea for default bail

NHRC refuses to take action against illegal detention of women anti-CAA protesters

Independent probe into Shiv Kumar’s alleged custodial torture ordered by Punjab & Haryana HC

Guj HC points out “rampant misuse” of PASA Act

The court said that this was one of the examples where the police took on the responsibility to settle financial disputes between parties

PASA ACt

Gujarat High Court has pre-emptively stalled the execution of detention order under Prevention of Anti- Social Activities (PASA) Act while observing that there has been a rampant misuse of the law. The bench of Justice Paresh Upadhyay observed that it was a private dispute between the parties but the police had still filed the FIR and deemed the petitioner, Rohitbhai Luni, to be a ‘dangerous person’ under PASA and intended to detain him.

The counsel for the petitioner, Shakeel Kureshi submitted that the dispute is private in nature and under no circumstances can it be brought under definition of “dangerous person” under PASA. The petitioner sought protection from detention under PASA.

The court perused the complaint and observed that it was a private dispute between the parties. The court further stated that the complainant had resorted to arm twisting with the aid of the police who had readily filed the FIR.

The court observed, “Such tactics need to be nipped in the bud. Rampant misuse of PASA is noticed by this court. This is one of such examples, where it is the police authorities who take upon such responsibility to settle the financial transaction / disputes between the parties, with the aid / threat of PASA.”

The court held that even if the petitioner may or may not be protected in the crimes registered under IPC, he cannot be termed as a dangerous person under PASA.

The court’s attention was also brought to another case where a woman was forced to remain in jail for two months after being detained under PASA after which the court set aside the detention order in February.

The detaining authority had not passed any detention order as yet, but the authority had submitted that it did intend to send the proposal to detain the petitioner under PASA. Thus, the court directed that if any such detention order is passed against the petitioner on the basis of this FIR, the same shall not be executed for period of one month from the date of service.

In August 2020 as well the Gujarat High Court had reprimanded the police as they had deemed the petitioner to be a ‘dangerous person’ under PASA for not wearing a mask and for having an altercation with the police.

The complete order may be read here:

 

Related:

Protect arrestee’s human rights: Lawyers send open letter to UNHRC

SC reserves order in Gautam Navlakha’s plea for default bail

NHRC refuses to take action against illegal detention of women anti-CAA protesters

Independent probe into Shiv Kumar’s alleged custodial torture ordered by Punjab & Haryana HC

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Archives