Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Communalism Rule of Law

Jahangirpuri violence: Delhi Court refuses bail to eight accused

Court observes that Police accompanied the illegal processions, hence the liability on the part of the concerned officials needs to be fixed

Sabrangindia 10 May 2022

Jehangiripuri

A Delhi court has denied bail to eight accused in connection with the violence that broke out in Jahangirpuri during Hanuman Jayanti procession. In a crucial observation, the Court found that prima facie the case reflected that the local staff of the Jahangirpuri police station, led by inspector Rajiv Ranjan as well as other officials, were accompanying the allegedly illegal procession on its route, instead of stopping it.

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge Gagandeep Singh, while dismissing the bail application, noted that no ground was made out for grant of bail to the accused. The Court denied bail to Imteyaz, Noor Alam, Sheikh Hamid, Ahmad Ali, Sheikh Hamid, S.K. Sahahada, Sheikh Zakir and Ahir. The FIR was registered under IPC sections 147 (Punishment for rioting), 148 (Rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object), 186 (Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 353 ( Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 332 (Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty), 323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 427 (Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees), 436 (Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc), 307 (Attempt to murder), 120B (Punishment of criminal conspiracy) and sec. 27 (Punishment for using arms, etc) of the Arms Act.

Court’s observation and Order

The Sessions Court presided by Additional Sessions Judge Gagandeep Singh noted that the accused persons were identified on the basis of CCTV footage recorded on the day of incident and were also identified by eyewitnesses.

The Court found out from the prosecution’s argument, “The apprehension has been expressed by the prosecution that the public witness will not come forward as the rioters are known criminal of the area. Therefore, the apprehension of threatening/influencing the witness cannot be ruled at this stage, if the accused/applicant is enlarged on bail at this stage. The chargesheet is yet to be filed. The allegations are serious against the accused/applicant.”

The Court further considering the First Information Report (FIR) and the admissions made by the State, noted, “It is fairly admitted by on behalf of the State that the last procession which was passing through during which the unfortunate riots took place was illegal having no prior permission from police. If that was the situation, then the contents of the FIR itself, show that the local staff of police station Jahangir Puri, led by Inspector Rajiv Ranjan as well as other officials from DCP reserve were accompanying the said illegal procession on its route. It appears that local police instead of performing their duty in stopping the said illegal procession in the beginning itself and dispersing the crowd, was accompanying them to the entire route which later on led to unfortunate riots between   the two communities.”

The Court further observed the riot was a result of the failure of police officials in preventing the riots and noted, “It reflects the utter failure on the part of local police in stopping the said procession having no permission. The issue seems to have been simply brushed aside by the senior officers. The liability on the part of the concerned officials needs to be fixed so that in future no such incident takes place and the police is not complacent in preventing the illegal activities.”

The Court directed that a copy of the Order be sent to the Commissioner of Police for information and remedial compliance.

The Order may be read here: 

Brief background of the case

Communal clashes allegedly broke out during a procession in northwest Delhi’s Jahangirpuri area on April 16. Violence broke out in the area when a religious procession of the majority community made its way past a mosque on the occasion of Hanuman Jayanti.

Nine people, including eight police personnel, were injured during the violence. It is alleged that procession participants allegedly chanted abusive slogans, entered a mosque during namaz and tried to plant a saffron flag inside.

The violence was followed by an "anti-encroachment drive" in the area. The local civic body, which is run by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the drive was launched to clear illegal constructions in the area. But Muslims say their properties were disproportionately targeted and they also questioned the timing of the drive, which continued for an hour after the Supreme Court gave an interim order to stop it.

 

Related:

Jahangirpuri Demolition: SC to take “serious view of demolitions after Mayor was informed of order”

Eye witness account from the broken heart of Jahangirpuri

Jahangirpuri demolition drive: Brinda Karat walks the talk yet again!

Delhi: ‘Rohingya Bangladeshi’ taunts putting other Muslim dominated areas on the buldozer map?

‘An eye for an eye’- new law of the land for the Muslim minorities in India?

Ram Navami violence: PILs seek SC monitored investigations, transfer of cases to NIA

Jahangirpuri violence: Delhi Court refuses bail to eight accused

Court observes that Police accompanied the illegal processions, hence the liability on the part of the concerned officials needs to be fixed

Jehangiripuri

A Delhi court has denied bail to eight accused in connection with the violence that broke out in Jahangirpuri during Hanuman Jayanti procession. In a crucial observation, the Court found that prima facie the case reflected that the local staff of the Jahangirpuri police station, led by inspector Rajiv Ranjan as well as other officials, were accompanying the allegedly illegal procession on its route, instead of stopping it.

The Court of Additional Sessions Judge Gagandeep Singh, while dismissing the bail application, noted that no ground was made out for grant of bail to the accused. The Court denied bail to Imteyaz, Noor Alam, Sheikh Hamid, Ahmad Ali, Sheikh Hamid, S.K. Sahahada, Sheikh Zakir and Ahir. The FIR was registered under IPC sections 147 (Punishment for rioting), 148 (Rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object), 186 (Obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 353 ( Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 332 (Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty), 323 (Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt), 427 (Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees), 436 (Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc), 307 (Attempt to murder), 120B (Punishment of criminal conspiracy) and sec. 27 (Punishment for using arms, etc) of the Arms Act.

Court’s observation and Order

The Sessions Court presided by Additional Sessions Judge Gagandeep Singh noted that the accused persons were identified on the basis of CCTV footage recorded on the day of incident and were also identified by eyewitnesses.

The Court found out from the prosecution’s argument, “The apprehension has been expressed by the prosecution that the public witness will not come forward as the rioters are known criminal of the area. Therefore, the apprehension of threatening/influencing the witness cannot be ruled at this stage, if the accused/applicant is enlarged on bail at this stage. The chargesheet is yet to be filed. The allegations are serious against the accused/applicant.”

The Court further considering the First Information Report (FIR) and the admissions made by the State, noted, “It is fairly admitted by on behalf of the State that the last procession which was passing through during which the unfortunate riots took place was illegal having no prior permission from police. If that was the situation, then the contents of the FIR itself, show that the local staff of police station Jahangir Puri, led by Inspector Rajiv Ranjan as well as other officials from DCP reserve were accompanying the said illegal procession on its route. It appears that local police instead of performing their duty in stopping the said illegal procession in the beginning itself and dispersing the crowd, was accompanying them to the entire route which later on led to unfortunate riots between   the two communities.”

The Court further observed the riot was a result of the failure of police officials in preventing the riots and noted, “It reflects the utter failure on the part of local police in stopping the said procession having no permission. The issue seems to have been simply brushed aside by the senior officers. The liability on the part of the concerned officials needs to be fixed so that in future no such incident takes place and the police is not complacent in preventing the illegal activities.”

The Court directed that a copy of the Order be sent to the Commissioner of Police for information and remedial compliance.

The Order may be read here: 

Brief background of the case

Communal clashes allegedly broke out during a procession in northwest Delhi’s Jahangirpuri area on April 16. Violence broke out in the area when a religious procession of the majority community made its way past a mosque on the occasion of Hanuman Jayanti.

Nine people, including eight police personnel, were injured during the violence. It is alleged that procession participants allegedly chanted abusive slogans, entered a mosque during namaz and tried to plant a saffron flag inside.

The violence was followed by an "anti-encroachment drive" in the area. The local civic body, which is run by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), said the drive was launched to clear illegal constructions in the area. But Muslims say their properties were disproportionately targeted and they also questioned the timing of the drive, which continued for an hour after the Supreme Court gave an interim order to stop it.

 

Related:

Jahangirpuri Demolition: SC to take “serious view of demolitions after Mayor was informed of order”

Eye witness account from the broken heart of Jahangirpuri

Jahangirpuri demolition drive: Brinda Karat walks the talk yet again!

Delhi: ‘Rohingya Bangladeshi’ taunts putting other Muslim dominated areas on the buldozer map?

‘An eye for an eye’- new law of the land for the Muslim minorities in India?

Ram Navami violence: PILs seek SC monitored investigations, transfer of cases to NIA

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Videos

Communalism

Hate, Arms, Shrine Takeovers: Is Hindutva extremism at its peak in Karnataka?

WATCH: In this SabrangIndia Exclusive show called 'Column 9', journalist & activist Shivasundar talks about the journey of Hindutva Extremism, from fringe groups to the center, in Karnataka, which is arguably empowered and emboldened by the legislative and judiciary, simultaneously.

Communalism

Hate, Arms, Shrine Takeovers: Is Hindutva extremism at its peak in Karnataka?

WATCH: In this SabrangIndia Exclusive show called 'Column 9', journalist & activist Shivasundar talks about the journey of Hindutva Extremism, from fringe groups to the center, in Karnataka, which is arguably empowered and emboldened by the legislative and judiciary, simultaneously.

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives