Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom Rule of Law

J&K HC: Notice issued in plea challenging “maximum” period of detention under PSA

The petition states that the period of detention under the Act is in violation of Article 22 of the Constitution

Sabrangindia 24 Feb 2021

PSA

A plea has been filed before Jammu and Kashmir High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 18 of the Public Safety Act, 1978 (PSA). Section 18 of the Act prescribes maximum period of detention after the Advisory board has confirmed detention of the detainee. It provides that a person, acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, may be detained for up to twelve months and a person, acting in a manner prejudicial to the security of the State may be detained for up to two years.

The petition filed by Zulker Nain Sheikh & Associates on behalf of Petitioner-Advocate Mustafa MH was heard by a division bench comprising Justices Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Javed Iqbal Wani which issued notices to the administration. The notice issued by the bench was waived by Deputy Advocate General Aijaz Lone, and the court directed that reply be filed within 4 weeks and listed the matter for April 5, 2021.

It has been contended that section 18 is violative of Article 22 (7) of the Indian Constitution which provides that the maximum period of preventive detention shall not exceed three months, without obtaining the opinion of an Advisory Board.

The petitioner states that after the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019 and with the passing of the J&K Reorganization Act, 2019 many laws of the Centre including Article 22 (7) of the Constitution have become applicable to Jammu and Kashmir. “Due to the applicability of Article 22 (7) now to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, Section 18 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act shall be violative of Article 22 of the Constitution of India,” states the plea.

The plea states that the National Security Act (NSA) has also become applicable to the UT and hence it is now in direct conflict with PSA since NSA proscribes maximum detention of 1 year while PSA provides for maximum detention of 2 years. The plea states, “Since the maximum Punishment for the Preventive Detention as per Article 22 (7) of the Constitution shall be decided by the Parliament and since further the National Security Act of 1980 is the law made by the Parliament, the maximum punishment as decided by the National Security Act should be taken as the position with regard to the Maximum Punishment in Preventive Detention.”

The petition prays that the court declares section 18 of PSA as null and void being ultra vires the Constitution of India.

The order may be read here:

 

Related:

National Conference leader Hilal Lone arrested under UAPA

Over 400 detainees released under Public Safety Act in J&K: MHA

Bombay HC order on medical bail for Varavara Rao sets an imp precedent

J&K HC: Notice issued in plea challenging “maximum” period of detention under PSA

The petition states that the period of detention under the Act is in violation of Article 22 of the Constitution

PSA

A plea has been filed before Jammu and Kashmir High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 18 of the Public Safety Act, 1978 (PSA). Section 18 of the Act prescribes maximum period of detention after the Advisory board has confirmed detention of the detainee. It provides that a person, acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, may be detained for up to twelve months and a person, acting in a manner prejudicial to the security of the State may be detained for up to two years.

The petition filed by Zulker Nain Sheikh & Associates on behalf of Petitioner-Advocate Mustafa MH was heard by a division bench comprising Justices Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Javed Iqbal Wani which issued notices to the administration. The notice issued by the bench was waived by Deputy Advocate General Aijaz Lone, and the court directed that reply be filed within 4 weeks and listed the matter for April 5, 2021.

It has been contended that section 18 is violative of Article 22 (7) of the Indian Constitution which provides that the maximum period of preventive detention shall not exceed three months, without obtaining the opinion of an Advisory Board.

The petitioner states that after the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019 and with the passing of the J&K Reorganization Act, 2019 many laws of the Centre including Article 22 (7) of the Constitution have become applicable to Jammu and Kashmir. “Due to the applicability of Article 22 (7) now to the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, Section 18 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act shall be violative of Article 22 of the Constitution of India,” states the plea.

The plea states that the National Security Act (NSA) has also become applicable to the UT and hence it is now in direct conflict with PSA since NSA proscribes maximum detention of 1 year while PSA provides for maximum detention of 2 years. The plea states, “Since the maximum Punishment for the Preventive Detention as per Article 22 (7) of the Constitution shall be decided by the Parliament and since further the National Security Act of 1980 is the law made by the Parliament, the maximum punishment as decided by the National Security Act should be taken as the position with regard to the Maximum Punishment in Preventive Detention.”

The petition prays that the court declares section 18 of PSA as null and void being ultra vires the Constitution of India.

The order may be read here:

 

Related:

National Conference leader Hilal Lone arrested under UAPA

Over 400 detainees released under Public Safety Act in J&K: MHA

Bombay HC order on medical bail for Varavara Rao sets an imp precedent

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Archives