Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Rule of Law Farm and Forest

Lakhimpur Kheri violence: UP Police offers only excuses, sealed cover reports for SC

The Supreme Court expressed its discontent that statements of only four witnesses were recorded and questioned, and why all accused were not kept in police custody

Sabrangindia 21 Oct 2021

Lakhimpur Kheri violence: UP Police has only excuses, sealed cover reports for SC

The Supreme Court has orally remarked that the UP Police are dragging their feet in their investigation into the Lakhimpur Kheri violence, where peacefully marching farmers were allegedly run over by a powerful minister's son. 

The bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and also comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, questioned Senior Advocate Harish Salve appearing for UP government, as to why statements of only four witnesses were recorded so far.

While Salve tried to reason that courts are closed due to Dussehra vacation, the bench pointed out that criminal courts are not closed in vacations. Senior Advocate Garima Prashad, also appearing for UP government tried to reason that it was because the police were recreating the crime scene. To this, the bench pointed out that both recording of statements and recreating crime scene are mutually exclusive and are two different things.

It was after such comments from the state counsels, Justice Hima Kohli remarked, “We get the impression that you are dragging your feet, please do the needful to dispel that,” reported LiveLaw.

The bench pointed out that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) will have to identify the vulnerable witnesses and afford them protection and get their statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC, as it will have more evidentiary value.

When the bench was presented with a status report in a sealed cover by Salve, CJI Ramana said that the bench waited for additional material until the previous night and commented that it did not seek a report in sealed cover.

Based on the sealed status report, Salve was seeking an adjournment for Friday, however, the bench refused and perused the status report to continue with the hearing.

When Salve informed the bench that in the case so far four persons were in police custody and six were in judicial custody, the bench questioned that as well, and sought to know why weren’t all accused kept in police custody for questioning. Ashish Mishra was kept in police custody for three days and then remanded to judicial custody.

Salve responded that the phones have been seized and if forensic reports arrive, there may no longer be need for further questioning.

The court scheduled the matter for hearing on October 26 and Salve assured the bench that more statements will be recorded under section 164 CrPC to dispel the doubts of the bench.

Previous hearing

At the previous hearing as well, the bench was not much pleased with the manner in which UP Police were handling the investigation and had questioned why Ashish Mishra was not taken into custody.

The bench had also expressed its discontent that the SIT comprised all local superintendents and police officers, and had asked whether CBI probe was to be initiated.

Background

On October 7, the court had taken up the matter as a public interest litigation on the basis of a letter written by two advocates, Shiv Kumar Tripathi and Amritpal Singh.

On October 3, 2021, a convoy of vehicles associated with BJP’s Union Minister of State for Home, Ajay Mishra Teni, his son Ashish Mishra Teni, and other goons allegedly ran over several farmers, peacefully protesting at Tikonia in Lakhimpur Kheri district of Uttar Pradesh. As reported in the media, one of the farmers was shot dead by the son of the union minister. In addition to this, four farmers and one local journalist were killed in the incident, and several others were seriously injured. 

The order may be read here:

 

Related:

UP court denies bail Ashish Mishra in Lakhimpur Kheri case

Lakhimpur violence: SC asks UP Gov’t to provide details of the FIR, number of arrests made

We are not satisfied with UP Government’s actions: SC on Lakhimpur Kheri incident

Lakhimpur Kheri violence: UP Police offers only excuses, sealed cover reports for SC

The Supreme Court expressed its discontent that statements of only four witnesses were recorded and questioned, and why all accused were not kept in police custody

Lakhimpur Kheri violence: UP Police has only excuses, sealed cover reports for SC

The Supreme Court has orally remarked that the UP Police are dragging their feet in their investigation into the Lakhimpur Kheri violence, where peacefully marching farmers were allegedly run over by a powerful minister's son. 

The bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and also comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, questioned Senior Advocate Harish Salve appearing for UP government, as to why statements of only four witnesses were recorded so far.

While Salve tried to reason that courts are closed due to Dussehra vacation, the bench pointed out that criminal courts are not closed in vacations. Senior Advocate Garima Prashad, also appearing for UP government tried to reason that it was because the police were recreating the crime scene. To this, the bench pointed out that both recording of statements and recreating crime scene are mutually exclusive and are two different things.

It was after such comments from the state counsels, Justice Hima Kohli remarked, “We get the impression that you are dragging your feet, please do the needful to dispel that,” reported LiveLaw.

The bench pointed out that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) will have to identify the vulnerable witnesses and afford them protection and get their statements recorded under Section 164 CrPC, as it will have more evidentiary value.

When the bench was presented with a status report in a sealed cover by Salve, CJI Ramana said that the bench waited for additional material until the previous night and commented that it did not seek a report in sealed cover.

Based on the sealed status report, Salve was seeking an adjournment for Friday, however, the bench refused and perused the status report to continue with the hearing.

When Salve informed the bench that in the case so far four persons were in police custody and six were in judicial custody, the bench questioned that as well, and sought to know why weren’t all accused kept in police custody for questioning. Ashish Mishra was kept in police custody for three days and then remanded to judicial custody.

Salve responded that the phones have been seized and if forensic reports arrive, there may no longer be need for further questioning.

The court scheduled the matter for hearing on October 26 and Salve assured the bench that more statements will be recorded under section 164 CrPC to dispel the doubts of the bench.

Previous hearing

At the previous hearing as well, the bench was not much pleased with the manner in which UP Police were handling the investigation and had questioned why Ashish Mishra was not taken into custody.

The bench had also expressed its discontent that the SIT comprised all local superintendents and police officers, and had asked whether CBI probe was to be initiated.

Background

On October 7, the court had taken up the matter as a public interest litigation on the basis of a letter written by two advocates, Shiv Kumar Tripathi and Amritpal Singh.

On October 3, 2021, a convoy of vehicles associated with BJP’s Union Minister of State for Home, Ajay Mishra Teni, his son Ashish Mishra Teni, and other goons allegedly ran over several farmers, peacefully protesting at Tikonia in Lakhimpur Kheri district of Uttar Pradesh. As reported in the media, one of the farmers was shot dead by the son of the union minister. In addition to this, four farmers and one local journalist were killed in the incident, and several others were seriously injured. 

The order may be read here:

 

Related:

UP court denies bail Ashish Mishra in Lakhimpur Kheri case

Lakhimpur violence: SC asks UP Gov’t to provide details of the FIR, number of arrests made

We are not satisfied with UP Government’s actions: SC on Lakhimpur Kheri incident

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Videos

Dalit Bahujan Adivasi

Why are Adivasis protesting against power projects in Ajodhya Hills?

Adivasis and local residents, opposed to the newly proposed hydel power project in the remote Ajodhya Hills in West Bengal, are heightening their prolonged protests against these projects. Watch this sabrangindia exclusive to hear what Adivasi Activists, local residents, forest dwellers and environmentalists have to say.

Dalit Bahujan Adivasi

Why are Adivasis protesting against power projects in Ajodhya Hills?

Adivasis and local residents, opposed to the newly proposed hydel power project in the remote Ajodhya Hills in West Bengal, are heightening their prolonged protests against these projects. Watch this sabrangindia exclusive to hear what Adivasi Activists, local residents, forest dwellers and environmentalists have to say.

IN FACT

Analysis

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Archives