Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi Freedom

Law of force and the force of justice

Rajmohan Gandhi 08 Aug 2019

The abrogation of Article 370 confirms the charge of interest in territory and unconcern for people 


kashmir
Image Courtesy: PTI

‘With boli, not with goli.’ With words, not with bullets. That’s how New Delhi would deal with the people of Kashmir, Modi solemnly declared from the Red Fort on August 15, 2017. 

Only three days back, New Delhi’s governor in Kashmir had assured Kashmiri leaders that the sudden military bump-up, instructions to tens of thousands of Amarnath pilgrims to leave Kashmir at once and go back to their distant homes, and the shut-down of phone and internet services in the Valley did not amount to signs that anything major was to happen.

Then, on the morning of Monday Aug 5, an important article of the Constitution was excised without discussion. Loud cheers greeted the deed, which formally and surgically removes the last vestiges of Kashmiri autonomy. 

Several non-BJP parties applauded the not very noble step. A Shiv Sena MP expressed confidence that a future Akhand Bharat was on the horizon which, to begin with, would absorb the portion of Kashmir that Pakistan occupies and the restive Pakistani province of Balochistan.

Some insist that this constitutional change is no big deal, only an acknowledgment of long-existing reality. But there is celebration and pride. ‘India’s integration is finally complete,’ it will be said, ‘How happy the soul of Sardar Patel must be!’ (No, it won’t. But that is another discussion.) 

If the Tibet Autonomous Region is swiftly converted, following a quick short speech in the People’s Assembly in Beijing, into the Proud Chinese Province of Tibet, or the Proud Chinese Territory of Tibet, there would surely be celebrations in many parts of China. 

In those long-ago days when Indians were demanding freedom from the British, some of the latter, led by a certain Winston Churchill, would reply: ‘You want independence only to crush the weak and the small among you.’

‘AND I WAS RIGHT,’ Churchill may be heard roaring somewhere.

In those long-ago days, champions of a Hindu nationalist ideology opposed to efforts for Hindu-Muslim partnership used to say, ‘See how Hitler deals with a difficult minority!’  In more recent years, such champions have been saying, ‘See how Israel deals with a difficult minority-dominated area.’

In imitation of the Israeli example, it is possible that Kashmir’s absorption will be followed by the settlement of Indians from other areas in and near the Kashmir Valley, especially in the Jammu region, perhaps with the goal of turning the Valley’s majority Muslims into a minority in the single Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir that has been launched in tandem with the abrogation of Article 370.

There is the law of force, and there is the force of justice. The former acts swiftly, the latter takes time. 

Sometimes a great deal of time, as Indians knew when they were fighting for freedom, as the Dalai Lama and his Tibetans know as they struggle to retain a modicum of autonomy, and as the Palestinians know as they strive to retain self-respect even as more and more of their lands are taken over by a steam-rolling power.

These are only a few examples. Millions in the world have spent entire lives gulping humiliations. Eras where nations and societies permit weaker sections to dissent are in fact relatively new in the world’s story.

Some of us innocently thought that in India such an era would last forever. Holding that belief, we walked proudly in the world, holding aloft banners of ‘Democracy’ and ‘Human Rights’. Now we will fold up the streamers and lower our heads.

Much of India applauds the absorption of Kashmir. Marchers holding banners of ‘Resolve!’ and ‘National Greatness!’ will be welcomed with drumbeats. Modi’s favourable numbers will rise.

The majority is not always right. For centuries, the practice of untouchability in India and of slavery in the US received fervent majority support. The people of imperial Britain voted again and again for governments that promised tougher action against rebelling colonies.  

Within India, if strict laws did not exist, discrimination against women and Dalits would receive open majority support even today in many a village, taluka or district.

No doubt terror attacks by Hamas injured the cause of Palestine’s liberation. Terror attacks by Kashmiri extremists in the name of azadi alienated many Indians who might otherwise have supported a large degree of Kashmiri autonomy. 

The fact that hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits fled or were forced to flee the Valley was a huge gift to India’s champions of absorption.

But even serious flaws do not take away forever a human being’s right to govern herself or himself. The same is true for the right of an area’s people to offer consent to rulers or withhold it. They are human beings, not robots.

The abrogation of Article 370 confirms the charge of interest in territory and unconcern for people. It also signals the abandonment of any policy of winning Kashmiri hearts and minds. 

The two words, Union Territory, say it all. But the law of karma has not yet been abrogated. In the end, the arc of history is not kind to those who treat with contempt the dignity of a dissenting people.

Republished with permission of the author from his Blog

Law of force and the force of justice

The abrogation of Article 370 confirms the charge of interest in territory and unconcern for people 


kashmir
Image Courtesy: PTI

‘With boli, not with goli.’ With words, not with bullets. That’s how New Delhi would deal with the people of Kashmir, Modi solemnly declared from the Red Fort on August 15, 2017. 

Only three days back, New Delhi’s governor in Kashmir had assured Kashmiri leaders that the sudden military bump-up, instructions to tens of thousands of Amarnath pilgrims to leave Kashmir at once and go back to their distant homes, and the shut-down of phone and internet services in the Valley did not amount to signs that anything major was to happen.

Then, on the morning of Monday Aug 5, an important article of the Constitution was excised without discussion. Loud cheers greeted the deed, which formally and surgically removes the last vestiges of Kashmiri autonomy. 

Several non-BJP parties applauded the not very noble step. A Shiv Sena MP expressed confidence that a future Akhand Bharat was on the horizon which, to begin with, would absorb the portion of Kashmir that Pakistan occupies and the restive Pakistani province of Balochistan.

Some insist that this constitutional change is no big deal, only an acknowledgment of long-existing reality. But there is celebration and pride. ‘India’s integration is finally complete,’ it will be said, ‘How happy the soul of Sardar Patel must be!’ (No, it won’t. But that is another discussion.) 

If the Tibet Autonomous Region is swiftly converted, following a quick short speech in the People’s Assembly in Beijing, into the Proud Chinese Province of Tibet, or the Proud Chinese Territory of Tibet, there would surely be celebrations in many parts of China. 

In those long-ago days when Indians were demanding freedom from the British, some of the latter, led by a certain Winston Churchill, would reply: ‘You want independence only to crush the weak and the small among you.’

‘AND I WAS RIGHT,’ Churchill may be heard roaring somewhere.

In those long-ago days, champions of a Hindu nationalist ideology opposed to efforts for Hindu-Muslim partnership used to say, ‘See how Hitler deals with a difficult minority!’  In more recent years, such champions have been saying, ‘See how Israel deals with a difficult minority-dominated area.’

In imitation of the Israeli example, it is possible that Kashmir’s absorption will be followed by the settlement of Indians from other areas in and near the Kashmir Valley, especially in the Jammu region, perhaps with the goal of turning the Valley’s majority Muslims into a minority in the single Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir that has been launched in tandem with the abrogation of Article 370.

There is the law of force, and there is the force of justice. The former acts swiftly, the latter takes time. 

Sometimes a great deal of time, as Indians knew when they were fighting for freedom, as the Dalai Lama and his Tibetans know as they struggle to retain a modicum of autonomy, and as the Palestinians know as they strive to retain self-respect even as more and more of their lands are taken over by a steam-rolling power.

These are only a few examples. Millions in the world have spent entire lives gulping humiliations. Eras where nations and societies permit weaker sections to dissent are in fact relatively new in the world’s story.

Some of us innocently thought that in India such an era would last forever. Holding that belief, we walked proudly in the world, holding aloft banners of ‘Democracy’ and ‘Human Rights’. Now we will fold up the streamers and lower our heads.

Much of India applauds the absorption of Kashmir. Marchers holding banners of ‘Resolve!’ and ‘National Greatness!’ will be welcomed with drumbeats. Modi’s favourable numbers will rise.

The majority is not always right. For centuries, the practice of untouchability in India and of slavery in the US received fervent majority support. The people of imperial Britain voted again and again for governments that promised tougher action against rebelling colonies.  

Within India, if strict laws did not exist, discrimination against women and Dalits would receive open majority support even today in many a village, taluka or district.

No doubt terror attacks by Hamas injured the cause of Palestine’s liberation. Terror attacks by Kashmiri extremists in the name of azadi alienated many Indians who might otherwise have supported a large degree of Kashmiri autonomy. 

The fact that hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits fled or were forced to flee the Valley was a huge gift to India’s champions of absorption.

But even serious flaws do not take away forever a human being’s right to govern herself or himself. The same is true for the right of an area’s people to offer consent to rulers or withhold it. They are human beings, not robots.

The abrogation of Article 370 confirms the charge of interest in territory and unconcern for people. It also signals the abandonment of any policy of winning Kashmiri hearts and minds. 

The two words, Union Territory, say it all. But the law of karma has not yet been abrogated. In the end, the arc of history is not kind to those who treat with contempt the dignity of a dissenting people.

Republished with permission of the author from his Blog

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Videos

Communalism

Hate Speech is rampant while Free speech is criminalised | Teesta Setalvad

Eminent speakers like Justice Anjana Prakash, Saba Naqvi expressed grave concerns over the draconian laws, used to put down the struggles of the labouring masses and the manner in which the law enforcement have been taking down students, academicians, political and human rights activists, artists, Dalits, Muslims and tribal people.

Communalism

Hate Speech is rampant while Free speech is criminalised | Teesta Setalvad

Eminent speakers like Justice Anjana Prakash, Saba Naqvi expressed grave concerns over the draconian laws, used to put down the struggles of the labouring masses and the manner in which the law enforcement have been taking down students, academicians, political and human rights activists, artists, Dalits, Muslims and tribal people.

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives