Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
India

Is MHA distancing itself from Assam Clause 6 committee report?

Report will be submitted to Assam Chief Minister instead of MHA representative

Sabrangindia 21 Feb 2020

Assam

Just yesterday, we had told you how the recommendations of a report by Assam Clause 6 committee were all set to divide Assam into a state of ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’. We had also told you how the report was perceived to e rather contentious and how Home Secretary, Government of India, Satyendra Garg, who is member secretary of the committee, had not signed the report.

Now, it turns out that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), that was originally expected to receive the report on behalf of the Government of India, might now even receive the report. According to the Indian Express, the report will be handed over to the Assam state government and not the MHA that constituted the committee in the first place. Sources told the Indian Express that there is unease in the central government over the report because the committee is learnt to have recommended a 1951 cut-off date to define “Assamese” people, and has also suggested an Inner Line Permit regime for the state.

SabrangIndia had reported earlier that the government of India has turned down the high-power committee recommended reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 in Assam. As per report, the reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 will create a bar on implementation of CAA in Assam.

So, there were at least 4 meetings where joint Home Secretary, Government of India, Satyendra Garg, who is member secretary of the committee, was not present. It was informed to Assam Chief Minister Sarbananda Sanowal, who also spoke to Garg, but had no results. So, the committee submitted its unsigned final report to Satyendra Garg on February 14, 2020, and send a letter to Union Home Minister Amit Shah to formally submit the report. After repeated communications the committee was not allotted time to meet Amit Shah.

Rather, the union joint Home Secretary, Satyendra Garg advised the committee to change the line "Union Government will take proper steps to reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 in Assam" to "Union Government may take proper steps to reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 in Assam". It antagonised all other members of the committee. In this situation the Chairman of the high-power committee submitted its final report to Assam Accord implementation Department on February 19, 2020. The final report was signed by all members other than Satyendra Garg.

Now, Assam Finance and Health Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has told the Indian Express, “Yes, they will submit the report on February 25 to the Chief Minister. He will receive it on behalf of the Government of India.” Another MHA source told the paper, “We are told the cut-off date they have set for defining Assamese is pre-1951 NRC. This means if we accept it, we will have to conduct another NRC in Assam. Also, we are not yet in favour of granting the ILP to Assam.”

Amit Shah's case for Clause 6 committee

It may be recalled that it was Home Minister Amit Shah who had called out the previous governments for failing to form the Clause 6 committee. Now, Clause 6 of the Assam Accord says, “Constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards, as may be appropriate, shall be provided to protect, preserve and promote the cultural, social, linguistic identity and heritage of the Assamese people.” Nowhere does it mention requirement for formation of any committee.

It may also be recalled that telecast of Rajya Sabha TV was temporarily suspended on December 10, 2019, when Amit Shah started speaking about the Clause 6 committee. At 12:20 PM Shah started speaking about Assam. He said, “As far as Assam is concerned, I want to put forth a hard truth before the house. In 1985, then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi signed the Assam Accord. As per clause six of the accord government was to protect the identity, language, culture and representation of the people of Assam. The government was to set up a committee under clause 6 to look into this. But this committee was not made until Narendra Modi came to power.” Shah went on to invoke the martyrs of the Assam agitation saying, “We believe that the sacrifices of the martyrs should not go in vain. Which is why we will bring the real solution to Assam’s problems. This is why we have created a clause 6 committee that also includes members of AASU (the organization at the forefront of the Assam agitation) and Asom Gana Parishad.”

This led to vociferous retaliation from the opposition benches. “This is misleading. There is no need for committee for clause 6,” said Ripun Bora of the Congress, fact checking Amit Shah. But Vice President Venkaiah Naidu asked him to sit down claiming Bora was misbehaving. Naidu further ordered, “This will not go on record. Nothing should be shown.” But Bora kept drawing attention to clause 5 instead of clause 6, as it is the various provisions of clause 5 that deal with questions about the influx of foreigners. Shortly after this telecast of proceedings was suspended and the screen simply read, “Telecast of proceedings of Rajya Sabha to resume shortly.” A few minutes later, when proceedings resumed, the commotion had died down.


Related:

Assam’s future citizens: The ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots’

Opposition questions Amit Shah’s submission on Assam, RS telecast temporarily suspended

 

Is MHA distancing itself from Assam Clause 6 committee report?

Report will be submitted to Assam Chief Minister instead of MHA representative

Assam

Just yesterday, we had told you how the recommendations of a report by Assam Clause 6 committee were all set to divide Assam into a state of ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’. We had also told you how the report was perceived to e rather contentious and how Home Secretary, Government of India, Satyendra Garg, who is member secretary of the committee, had not signed the report.

Now, it turns out that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), that was originally expected to receive the report on behalf of the Government of India, might now even receive the report. According to the Indian Express, the report will be handed over to the Assam state government and not the MHA that constituted the committee in the first place. Sources told the Indian Express that there is unease in the central government over the report because the committee is learnt to have recommended a 1951 cut-off date to define “Assamese” people, and has also suggested an Inner Line Permit regime for the state.

SabrangIndia had reported earlier that the government of India has turned down the high-power committee recommended reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 in Assam. As per report, the reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 will create a bar on implementation of CAA in Assam.

So, there were at least 4 meetings where joint Home Secretary, Government of India, Satyendra Garg, who is member secretary of the committee, was not present. It was informed to Assam Chief Minister Sarbananda Sanowal, who also spoke to Garg, but had no results. So, the committee submitted its unsigned final report to Satyendra Garg on February 14, 2020, and send a letter to Union Home Minister Amit Shah to formally submit the report. After repeated communications the committee was not allotted time to meet Amit Shah.

Rather, the union joint Home Secretary, Satyendra Garg advised the committee to change the line "Union Government will take proper steps to reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 in Assam" to "Union Government may take proper steps to reconciliation of Eastern Bengal Frontier Regulations 1873 in Assam". It antagonised all other members of the committee. In this situation the Chairman of the high-power committee submitted its final report to Assam Accord implementation Department on February 19, 2020. The final report was signed by all members other than Satyendra Garg.

Now, Assam Finance and Health Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has told the Indian Express, “Yes, they will submit the report on February 25 to the Chief Minister. He will receive it on behalf of the Government of India.” Another MHA source told the paper, “We are told the cut-off date they have set for defining Assamese is pre-1951 NRC. This means if we accept it, we will have to conduct another NRC in Assam. Also, we are not yet in favour of granting the ILP to Assam.”

Amit Shah's case for Clause 6 committee

It may be recalled that it was Home Minister Amit Shah who had called out the previous governments for failing to form the Clause 6 committee. Now, Clause 6 of the Assam Accord says, “Constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards, as may be appropriate, shall be provided to protect, preserve and promote the cultural, social, linguistic identity and heritage of the Assamese people.” Nowhere does it mention requirement for formation of any committee.

It may also be recalled that telecast of Rajya Sabha TV was temporarily suspended on December 10, 2019, when Amit Shah started speaking about the Clause 6 committee. At 12:20 PM Shah started speaking about Assam. He said, “As far as Assam is concerned, I want to put forth a hard truth before the house. In 1985, then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi signed the Assam Accord. As per clause six of the accord government was to protect the identity, language, culture and representation of the people of Assam. The government was to set up a committee under clause 6 to look into this. But this committee was not made until Narendra Modi came to power.” Shah went on to invoke the martyrs of the Assam agitation saying, “We believe that the sacrifices of the martyrs should not go in vain. Which is why we will bring the real solution to Assam’s problems. This is why we have created a clause 6 committee that also includes members of AASU (the organization at the forefront of the Assam agitation) and Asom Gana Parishad.”

This led to vociferous retaliation from the opposition benches. “This is misleading. There is no need for committee for clause 6,” said Ripun Bora of the Congress, fact checking Amit Shah. But Vice President Venkaiah Naidu asked him to sit down claiming Bora was misbehaving. Naidu further ordered, “This will not go on record. Nothing should be shown.” But Bora kept drawing attention to clause 5 instead of clause 6, as it is the various provisions of clause 5 that deal with questions about the influx of foreigners. Shortly after this telecast of proceedings was suspended and the screen simply read, “Telecast of proceedings of Rajya Sabha to resume shortly.” A few minutes later, when proceedings resumed, the commotion had died down.


Related:

Assam’s future citizens: The ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots’

Opposition questions Amit Shah’s submission on Assam, RS telecast temporarily suspended

 

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives