Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Communalism Rule of Law

No coercive steps to be taken against journalist, lawyers charged by Tripura Police: Supreme Court 

Supreme Court issues notice to the Tripura government on petition challenging FIR registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act

Sabrangindia 17 Nov 2021

Tripura violence

The Supreme Court of India has ordered that “no coercive steps should be taken” against the two lawyers who were part of a fact-finding team that visited Tripura to investigate the communal violence that broke out in the state in October, and journalist Shyam Meera Singh who had written a social media post about the violence. They had all been booked under the draconian anti-terror law Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) by the Tripura Police for posting their opinions on social media, related to the recent communal violence in the state.

According to a report by Live Law, a Bench comprising Chief Justice NV Ramana, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Surya Kant, passed the order while issuing notice in the writ petition filed by lawyers Mukesh and Ansarul Haq Ansar and journalist Shyam Meera Singh seeking to quash the UAPA FIR. Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the two lawyers had visited Tripura and published a fact-finding report about the communal violence, which led to the Tripura police issuing notices under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure against them, asking their appearance for interrogation in relation to the FIR under UAPA.

It is reported that the CJI observed that he read some news reports that the journalists were granted bail in Tripura, however advocate Bhushan clarified that those were two other journalists, and the petitioners were yet to be arrested. The bench then ordered notice on the petition, and restrained Tripura Police from taking any coercive steps against the three petitioners.

Advocate Ehtesham Hashmi who led the fact-Onding team and co-authored the report along with Advocate Amit Srivastav, told SabrangIndia, on Wednesday, that the “Rule of law will always prevail... Grand salute to the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court.”

 

 

Their petition had been listed after a request seeking urgent hearing was made before a Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana by Advocate Prashant Bhushan on behalf of the petitioners. The news report stated that petitioners have also “challenged the constitutional validity of Section 2(1)(o)(which defines "unlawful activity), Section 13(punishment for unlawful activity) and 43D(5) (restrictions on grant of bail) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.” 

Delhi-based human rights lawyers Mukesh of Peoples Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and Ansar Indori of National Confederation of Human Rights, a part of Lawyers For Democracy, were booked by the Tripura Police under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for allegedly sharing fake information, on social media, as well as Twitter users who have been accused of posting "distorted or objectionable" content about the alleged Mosque vandalism in the state. Police say that these 68 handles have also been booked under stringent UAPA.

The group of lawyers had, after their visit to the violence hit areas of Tripura, investigated and released their fact finding report simultaneously in Agartala and in New Delhi on November 1. On Wednesday, November 3, Tripura Police sent notices under UAPA to two of the lawyers who were part of a fact-finding team that visited the northeastern state to investigate the communal violence that broke out there in October.

 

Related:

Journalists Samriddhi Sakunia and Swarna Jha granted bail 

Two Delhi-based women journalists arrested by Assam police on request from Tripura cops 

Tripura: Solidarity statements pour in for those penalised for raising voices

Tripura Police demand suspension of 68 Twitter profiles for comments on communal clashes

Tripura violence: Hate and communal polarisation

Notice under UAPA: A never ending spiral of detention

Tripura violence: Delhi-based lawyers booked under UAPA over social media posts

Fear and trauma still haunts survivors of anti-Muslim violence in Tripura: Lawyer for 

Anti Muslim violence in Tripura, HC takes suo motu cognisance

Tripura: CJP writes to NCM over vandalisation of mosques and shops owned by Muslims

 

No coercive steps to be taken against journalist, lawyers charged by Tripura Police: Supreme Court 

Supreme Court issues notice to the Tripura government on petition challenging FIR registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act

Tripura violence

The Supreme Court of India has ordered that “no coercive steps should be taken” against the two lawyers who were part of a fact-finding team that visited Tripura to investigate the communal violence that broke out in the state in October, and journalist Shyam Meera Singh who had written a social media post about the violence. They had all been booked under the draconian anti-terror law Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) by the Tripura Police for posting their opinions on social media, related to the recent communal violence in the state.

According to a report by Live Law, a Bench comprising Chief Justice NV Ramana, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Surya Kant, passed the order while issuing notice in the writ petition filed by lawyers Mukesh and Ansarul Haq Ansar and journalist Shyam Meera Singh seeking to quash the UAPA FIR. Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the two lawyers had visited Tripura and published a fact-finding report about the communal violence, which led to the Tripura police issuing notices under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure against them, asking their appearance for interrogation in relation to the FIR under UAPA.

It is reported that the CJI observed that he read some news reports that the journalists were granted bail in Tripura, however advocate Bhushan clarified that those were two other journalists, and the petitioners were yet to be arrested. The bench then ordered notice on the petition, and restrained Tripura Police from taking any coercive steps against the three petitioners.

Advocate Ehtesham Hashmi who led the fact-Onding team and co-authored the report along with Advocate Amit Srivastav, told SabrangIndia, on Wednesday, that the “Rule of law will always prevail... Grand salute to the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court.”

 

 

Their petition had been listed after a request seeking urgent hearing was made before a Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana by Advocate Prashant Bhushan on behalf of the petitioners. The news report stated that petitioners have also “challenged the constitutional validity of Section 2(1)(o)(which defines "unlawful activity), Section 13(punishment for unlawful activity) and 43D(5) (restrictions on grant of bail) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.” 

Delhi-based human rights lawyers Mukesh of Peoples Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and Ansar Indori of National Confederation of Human Rights, a part of Lawyers For Democracy, were booked by the Tripura Police under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for allegedly sharing fake information, on social media, as well as Twitter users who have been accused of posting "distorted or objectionable" content about the alleged Mosque vandalism in the state. Police say that these 68 handles have also been booked under stringent UAPA.

The group of lawyers had, after their visit to the violence hit areas of Tripura, investigated and released their fact finding report simultaneously in Agartala and in New Delhi on November 1. On Wednesday, November 3, Tripura Police sent notices under UAPA to two of the lawyers who were part of a fact-finding team that visited the northeastern state to investigate the communal violence that broke out there in October.

 

Related:

Journalists Samriddhi Sakunia and Swarna Jha granted bail 

Two Delhi-based women journalists arrested by Assam police on request from Tripura cops 

Tripura: Solidarity statements pour in for those penalised for raising voices

Tripura Police demand suspension of 68 Twitter profiles for comments on communal clashes

Tripura violence: Hate and communal polarisation

Notice under UAPA: A never ending spiral of detention

Tripura violence: Delhi-based lawyers booked under UAPA over social media posts

Fear and trauma still haunts survivors of anti-Muslim violence in Tripura: Lawyer for 

Anti Muslim violence in Tripura, HC takes suo motu cognisance

Tripura: CJP writes to NCM over vandalisation of mosques and shops owned by Muslims

 

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Videos

Dalit Bahujan Adivasi

Why are Adivasis protesting against power projects in Ajodhya Hills?

Adivasis and local residents, opposed to the newly proposed hydel power project in the remote Ajodhya Hills in West Bengal, are heightening their prolonged protests against these projects. Watch this sabrangindia exclusive to hear what Adivasi Activists, local residents, forest dwellers and environmentalists have to say.

Dalit Bahujan Adivasi

Why are Adivasis protesting against power projects in Ajodhya Hills?

Adivasis and local residents, opposed to the newly proposed hydel power project in the remote Ajodhya Hills in West Bengal, are heightening their prolonged protests against these projects. Watch this sabrangindia exclusive to hear what Adivasi Activists, local residents, forest dwellers and environmentalists have to say.

IN FACT

Analysis

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Archives