Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi Farm and Forest

Odisha govt cancels forest applications of over 6000 tribal families

On November 25, several Adivasi welfare organisations protested Odisha Government’s decision of arbitrarily rejecting forest rights claims of 6,313 traditional forest dwellers.

Sabrangindia 02 Dec 2019
Tribals 
Photo: Ishan Kukreti 


Leaders of many tribal forums such the Ganjam Adivasi Mancha (Campaign for Survival and Dignity affiliate) Rushikulya Rayat Mahasabha, and Bhita Mati Surakshya Abhijan met to show public dissent against the government move and declared that they will take to the streets and stage demonstrations against the decision of the Village Forest Protection Committee.

Adivasi committee leader Jagabandhu Sabar said, “Though the Act gives rights to use forest land and forest resources to tribals and traditional forest dwellers for their livelihood, the state government is trying to deprive them of their rights.”

The New Indian Express reported officials of District Social Welfare Department saying that the land title applications of the 6,313 applicants were rejected because none of them could produce proof of their last three generations residing in the forest. 

The tribal leaders disagreed with the claim and said that the Government violated the Clause 12(A) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Amendment Rules, 2012 (Forest Rights Rules, 2012). It states that, except for gram sabha and the forest rights committee, no one can change or cancel forest rights applications of traditional forest dwellers.

Orissa Post reported that in an affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, the government said the demand of 1,48,870 families including 6,402 of Ganjam tribals for title of forest land would be rejected. After the Campaign for Survival and Dignity staged a protest demonstration in front of the State Legislative Assembly on July 22 this year, the government once again informed the court that it rejects the claims of the 13,851 families including 6,313 of Ganjam. 
 

Reported incompliance of appeal procedure

Down To Earth reported on the serious transgressions by the Odisha forest with respect to the process of appealing against rejection of claims.

Forest dwellers in and around the Chandaka Wildlife Sanctuary were orally told that their claims were rejected because the land they were occupying was leased to someone else, even though the Act requires written communication of rejection and with reasons so as to allow the applicants to appeal against the rejection within 60 days.  When a sub-divisional level committee (SDLC) was set up to look into appeals against rejected claims on June 18, these forest-dwellers were not given any direct notice, and were allegedly made to sign an affidavit which stated they accepted the decision of the SDLC.

With respect to Ganjam district, DownToEarth reported that officials went around villages asking Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) if they had any proof of occupation for the last three generations or 75 years and rejected the claims on the spot of those who did not have any.

In January 2018, the Odisha Forest Department was reported to have asked a Gram Sabha in Kalahandi district to follow a slew of measures it made if it wants to get Transit Permit (TP) for bamboo, against the provisions of the Forest Rights Act.


Related:
Tougher Than Steel: Odisha Community Rally Against Transfer of Their Land, Again
Odisha Dalit-Adivasis Protest Before Assembly, Seek Justice For Activists Killed in Fake Maoist Encounter
POSCO to Jindal: A Fact Finding Report
Maha gov’t blames DLCs for “unlawfully” rejecting Adivasis’ claims
Thousands of Adivasis demand the implementation of FRA 2006

Odisha govt cancels forest applications of over 6000 tribal families

On November 25, several Adivasi welfare organisations protested Odisha Government’s decision of arbitrarily rejecting forest rights claims of 6,313 traditional forest dwellers.

Tribals 
Photo: Ishan Kukreti 


Leaders of many tribal forums such the Ganjam Adivasi Mancha (Campaign for Survival and Dignity affiliate) Rushikulya Rayat Mahasabha, and Bhita Mati Surakshya Abhijan met to show public dissent against the government move and declared that they will take to the streets and stage demonstrations against the decision of the Village Forest Protection Committee.

Adivasi committee leader Jagabandhu Sabar said, “Though the Act gives rights to use forest land and forest resources to tribals and traditional forest dwellers for their livelihood, the state government is trying to deprive them of their rights.”

The New Indian Express reported officials of District Social Welfare Department saying that the land title applications of the 6,313 applicants were rejected because none of them could produce proof of their last three generations residing in the forest. 

The tribal leaders disagreed with the claim and said that the Government violated the Clause 12(A) of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Amendment Rules, 2012 (Forest Rights Rules, 2012). It states that, except for gram sabha and the forest rights committee, no one can change or cancel forest rights applications of traditional forest dwellers.

Orissa Post reported that in an affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court, the government said the demand of 1,48,870 families including 6,402 of Ganjam tribals for title of forest land would be rejected. After the Campaign for Survival and Dignity staged a protest demonstration in front of the State Legislative Assembly on July 22 this year, the government once again informed the court that it rejects the claims of the 13,851 families including 6,313 of Ganjam. 
 

Reported incompliance of appeal procedure

Down To Earth reported on the serious transgressions by the Odisha forest with respect to the process of appealing against rejection of claims.

Forest dwellers in and around the Chandaka Wildlife Sanctuary were orally told that their claims were rejected because the land they were occupying was leased to someone else, even though the Act requires written communication of rejection and with reasons so as to allow the applicants to appeal against the rejection within 60 days.  When a sub-divisional level committee (SDLC) was set up to look into appeals against rejected claims on June 18, these forest-dwellers were not given any direct notice, and were allegedly made to sign an affidavit which stated they accepted the decision of the SDLC.

With respect to Ganjam district, DownToEarth reported that officials went around villages asking Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) if they had any proof of occupation for the last three generations or 75 years and rejected the claims on the spot of those who did not have any.

In January 2018, the Odisha Forest Department was reported to have asked a Gram Sabha in Kalahandi district to follow a slew of measures it made if it wants to get Transit Permit (TP) for bamboo, against the provisions of the Forest Rights Act.


Related:
Tougher Than Steel: Odisha Community Rally Against Transfer of Their Land, Again
Odisha Dalit-Adivasis Protest Before Assembly, Seek Justice For Activists Killed in Fake Maoist Encounter
POSCO to Jindal: A Fact Finding Report
Maha gov’t blames DLCs for “unlawfully” rejecting Adivasis’ claims
Thousands of Adivasis demand the implementation of FRA 2006

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives