Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi Farm and Forest

Over 16,000 land claims under Forest Rights Act rejected in Karnataka

Officials allege encroachment and false claims lead to rejection

Sabrangindia 11 Aug 2022

Forest rightsImage courtesy: The Indian Express

As many as 16,000 claims filed under the Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006, have been rejected in just two regions of Karnataka – Sagar and Shivamogga, reported the Indian Express. This puts into jeopardy the lives and livelihoods of Karnataka’s Adivasis (indigenous tribal communities) and other forest dwelling people, who depend on forest land and other forest produce to sustain themselves.

Whose rights does the FRA recognise?

The FRA 2006 enables traditional forest dwelling communities to apply for claims to land and forest produce upon which they have been dependent for their livelihood for generations. The Act recognises the rights of two types of forest dwellers – Adivasi or tribal communities, many of which as included in the list of Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFD). While the STs are those who consider this their ancestral and traditional habitat, and depend on forest resources for livelihood, the OTFDs are those who have primarily resided in and depended on the forest land for livelihood needs for at least three generations prior to December 13, 2005.

Members of the above recognised communities have to go through a tedious application process to stake claim to land and forest resources. Often, they file claims as a community instead of individually. The All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), which is a partner organization of the CJP, has been helping Adivasis file these community land claims in different states such as Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh among others.

Rejection of land claims

The large-scale rejection of claims is, however, not unprecedented. It is noteworthy that in February, Indian Express had reported that over 44,000 FRA claims had been rejected in Shivamogga alone. At that time, deputy director of tribal welfare Ajjappa had told the publication, “We have received 97,074 applications of which 44,016 were rejected. This is the status as of January 31. However, those whose applications were rejected can again appeal within 90 days or else the forest department will evict them.”

Now, in fresh developments, the publication quoted data from the tribal welfare department till July 2022, and reported that out of the total 16,424 applications filed in Sagar, only 505 were approved and 4,993 were rejected, leaving 10,926 applications pending. Similarly, out of the 19,191 applications filed in Shivamogga, 11,982 were rejected and only 236 approved, leaving 6,973 pending.

The only recourse now for those whose applications have been rejected, is to appeal before sub-divisional level committees (SDLC) within 90 days.

Why are claims rejected?

According to authorities, there is large scale encroachment on forest lands and people allegedly file false claims, leading to a large number of rejections. There is reportedly an area of 27,918.06 acres of forest land that is presently encroached upon. They also say that often, there are also duplicate claims and people engage in deforestation to stake claim.

Former principal chief conservator of forest (head of forest force), Karnataka, BK Singh had told IE earlier this year, that after the enactment of the FRA, large scale deforestation for claiming the titles took place in Shivamogga, Kodagu and Haveri districts. He said, “Many false claims under FRA were manufactured. Trees were cleared, burnt and claims have been filed. If the satellite images of relevant periods are compared, the facts will come to light. It has been observed that once the claims are rejected, fresh applications are filed and cases are reopened.”

Readers would also recall that on February 13, 2019, the Supreme Court had ordered the eviction of forest dwellers whose claims had been rejected, though the order was stayed shortly thereafter on February 28, 2019. In fact, two grassroots women forest rights defenders – Sokalo Gond and Nivada Rana had moved Supreme Court, filing an intervention application in the existing Wildlife First case, with the backing of AIUFWP and CJP, demanding protection from such evictions for Adivasis and forest dwellers.

Meanwhile, political interests are also at play with local politicians stepping in to denotify forest lands in a bid to allegedly regularise encroachment for vote-bank politics. But then again, the definition of who is an “encroacher” and who is a “traditional inhabitant” also often depends on the political leanings of who is telling the story. What remains consistent in all stories though, is that those who suffer most are people hailing from historically backward, oppressed and marginalized communities, who first suffered under the British and now continue to suffer as pawns on a political chess-board. And yet somehow the complex situation is often reduced to an over-simplified version of the “environment vs. development” debate.

The New Indian Express had reported as far back as in January 2018, that from 2015 to 2017, out of the 3,095.17 hectares of forest land denotified in Karnataka, more than 70% was in Shivamogga district. Though a sizable chunk of this land was used to rehabilitate persons displaced due to the Sharavathi hydropower project. However, what added to the confusion was how a large number of the survey numbers of denotified land fell in the reserve forests of Kardibetta, Masaruru, Mallanduru, Kyasanuru, Mysavi, Bellanduru, Kudi, Handravathi, Suduru, Annagere and Gillalagundi, the estate forests of Puradallu, Kumadavathi and Shankar, the Anupinakatte Minor Forest, and the state forests of Anesara, Avinahalli, Ulluru and Oruve.

According to The Hindu, a total of 22,698 families were displaced by the project commissioned in 1964 and were rehabilitated on 13,067 acres of forest land.

 

Related:

Sokalo Gond and Nivada Rana lead the campaign for Forest Rights in SC

Lobby of Corporate Interests, Bureaucrats and Mafia looting Forest Land: Roma               

Over 16,000 land claims under Forest Rights Act rejected in Karnataka

Officials allege encroachment and false claims lead to rejection

Forest rightsImage courtesy: The Indian Express

As many as 16,000 claims filed under the Forest Rights Act (FRA) 2006, have been rejected in just two regions of Karnataka – Sagar and Shivamogga, reported the Indian Express. This puts into jeopardy the lives and livelihoods of Karnataka’s Adivasis (indigenous tribal communities) and other forest dwelling people, who depend on forest land and other forest produce to sustain themselves.

Whose rights does the FRA recognise?

The FRA 2006 enables traditional forest dwelling communities to apply for claims to land and forest produce upon which they have been dependent for their livelihood for generations. The Act recognises the rights of two types of forest dwellers – Adivasi or tribal communities, many of which as included in the list of Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFD). While the STs are those who consider this their ancestral and traditional habitat, and depend on forest resources for livelihood, the OTFDs are those who have primarily resided in and depended on the forest land for livelihood needs for at least three generations prior to December 13, 2005.

Members of the above recognised communities have to go through a tedious application process to stake claim to land and forest resources. Often, they file claims as a community instead of individually. The All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP), which is a partner organization of the CJP, has been helping Adivasis file these community land claims in different states such as Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh among others.

Rejection of land claims

The large-scale rejection of claims is, however, not unprecedented. It is noteworthy that in February, Indian Express had reported that over 44,000 FRA claims had been rejected in Shivamogga alone. At that time, deputy director of tribal welfare Ajjappa had told the publication, “We have received 97,074 applications of which 44,016 were rejected. This is the status as of January 31. However, those whose applications were rejected can again appeal within 90 days or else the forest department will evict them.”

Now, in fresh developments, the publication quoted data from the tribal welfare department till July 2022, and reported that out of the total 16,424 applications filed in Sagar, only 505 were approved and 4,993 were rejected, leaving 10,926 applications pending. Similarly, out of the 19,191 applications filed in Shivamogga, 11,982 were rejected and only 236 approved, leaving 6,973 pending.

The only recourse now for those whose applications have been rejected, is to appeal before sub-divisional level committees (SDLC) within 90 days.

Why are claims rejected?

According to authorities, there is large scale encroachment on forest lands and people allegedly file false claims, leading to a large number of rejections. There is reportedly an area of 27,918.06 acres of forest land that is presently encroached upon. They also say that often, there are also duplicate claims and people engage in deforestation to stake claim.

Former principal chief conservator of forest (head of forest force), Karnataka, BK Singh had told IE earlier this year, that after the enactment of the FRA, large scale deforestation for claiming the titles took place in Shivamogga, Kodagu and Haveri districts. He said, “Many false claims under FRA were manufactured. Trees were cleared, burnt and claims have been filed. If the satellite images of relevant periods are compared, the facts will come to light. It has been observed that once the claims are rejected, fresh applications are filed and cases are reopened.”

Readers would also recall that on February 13, 2019, the Supreme Court had ordered the eviction of forest dwellers whose claims had been rejected, though the order was stayed shortly thereafter on February 28, 2019. In fact, two grassroots women forest rights defenders – Sokalo Gond and Nivada Rana had moved Supreme Court, filing an intervention application in the existing Wildlife First case, with the backing of AIUFWP and CJP, demanding protection from such evictions for Adivasis and forest dwellers.

Meanwhile, political interests are also at play with local politicians stepping in to denotify forest lands in a bid to allegedly regularise encroachment for vote-bank politics. But then again, the definition of who is an “encroacher” and who is a “traditional inhabitant” also often depends on the political leanings of who is telling the story. What remains consistent in all stories though, is that those who suffer most are people hailing from historically backward, oppressed and marginalized communities, who first suffered under the British and now continue to suffer as pawns on a political chess-board. And yet somehow the complex situation is often reduced to an over-simplified version of the “environment vs. development” debate.

The New Indian Express had reported as far back as in January 2018, that from 2015 to 2017, out of the 3,095.17 hectares of forest land denotified in Karnataka, more than 70% was in Shivamogga district. Though a sizable chunk of this land was used to rehabilitate persons displaced due to the Sharavathi hydropower project. However, what added to the confusion was how a large number of the survey numbers of denotified land fell in the reserve forests of Kardibetta, Masaruru, Mallanduru, Kyasanuru, Mysavi, Bellanduru, Kudi, Handravathi, Suduru, Annagere and Gillalagundi, the estate forests of Puradallu, Kumadavathi and Shankar, the Anupinakatte Minor Forest, and the state forests of Anesara, Avinahalli, Ulluru and Oruve.

According to The Hindu, a total of 22,698 families were displaced by the project commissioned in 1964 and were rehabilitated on 13,067 acres of forest land.

 

Related:

Sokalo Gond and Nivada Rana lead the campaign for Forest Rights in SC

Lobby of Corporate Interests, Bureaucrats and Mafia looting Forest Land: Roma               

Related Articles

Communalism

Gandhi as “evil” (Mahiasura) is a time-tested narrative for all hues of Hindu communalists

The latest depiction of Mahatma Gandhi as ‘Mahiasura’ at the All India’s Hindu Mahasaha’s puja pandal in Kolkatta is a time-tested narrative of Hindu communalists who, as Teesta Setalvad has writen, regurgitate this narrative portraying Gandhi as different forms of “evil”

Communalism

Gandhi as “evil” (Mahiasura) is a time-tested narrative for all hues of Hindu communalists

The latest depiction of Mahatma Gandhi as ‘Mahiasura’ at the All India’s Hindu Mahasaha’s puja pandal in Kolkatta is a time-tested narrative of Hindu communalists who, as Teesta Setalvad has writen, regurgitate this narrative portraying Gandhi as different forms of “evil”


Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives