Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Religion Rule of Law

Religious conversion for marriage, disconcerting: Allahabad HC

The court referred to the Special Marriage Act as a solution to people professing different faiths

Sabrangindia 02 Nov 2020

Religious conversion for marriage

The Allahabad High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition in the matter Pooja @ Zoya vs State of Uttar Pradesh and others (HC W.P No. 446 of 2020) on October 8.

The judge observed that, “Though, under the Constitution, a citizen has the right to profess practise or propagate the religion of his / her choice but it is disconcerting that in matrimonial matters one party should change his / her faith to the other's just for the sake of matrimony and nothing more.”

The Single Bench drew a distinction between marriage and religion and said, “Marriage is one thing and religion quite another. If two citizens of India professing different religions wish to marry, it is open to them to do so under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which is one of the earliest endeavours towards a uniform Civil Code.”

On being asked by the court who the petitioner wanted to stay with, she stated that she wanted to live with her husband. The court while noting that she is a major said, “She has indicated her clear choice to stay with her husband with whom she claims to have married. She is a major and she is free to do so. She is free to stay with whomsoever she wants and go wherever she likes.”

The petitioner had converted to Islam before getting married this year and a petition was filed in the court alleging that she was illegally detained. The Allahabad High Court allowed her petition and ruled that she got married on her own volition and was free to exercise her choice.  

Recently, the Allahabad High Court had dismissed a writ petition filed by a married couple seeking police protection and direction to the respondent family to not interfere in their married life. The woman was a Muslim by birth and the court noted that she converted her religion to Hinduism a month before her marriage. This matter was heard before Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi of the Allahabad High Court in Priyanshi @ Km Shamreen and another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and others (W.P [Civ.] No. 14288 of 2020) on September 23, 2020.

The Single Bench had referred to Noor Jahan Begum @ Anjali Mishra and another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Others (W.P [Civ.] No. 57068 of 2014) in which, Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani of the Allahabad High Court had had dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by a couple to seek protection as they had tied the knot after the woman converted from Hinduism to Islam, and then performed the nikah. The court observed that conversion to Islam solely for marriage, without any real change of belief is neither bonafide nor valid.

Justice Surya Prakash opined that, “A conversion of religion by an individual to Islam can be said to be bonafide if he/she is major and of sound mind and embraces Islam by his/her own freewill and because of his/her faith and belief in the oneness of God (Allah) and prophetic character of Mohamed. If a conversion is not inspired by religion feeling and under gone for its own sake, but is resorted merely with object of creating a ground for some claim of right or as a device adopted for the purpose to avoid marriage or to achieve an object without faith and belief in the unity of God (Allah) and Mohamed to be his prophet, the conversion shall not be bonafide. In case of a religion conversion there should be a change of heart and honest conviction in the tenets of new religion in lieu of tenets of the original religion.”

The order dated October 8, 2020 may be read here:

 

Related:

Secularism or conversion

BJP spokesperson calls consensual marriage ‘love jihad’

Religious conversion for marriage, disconcerting: Allahabad HC

The court referred to the Special Marriage Act as a solution to people professing different faiths

Religious conversion for marriage

The Allahabad High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition in the matter Pooja @ Zoya vs State of Uttar Pradesh and others (HC W.P No. 446 of 2020) on October 8.

The judge observed that, “Though, under the Constitution, a citizen has the right to profess practise or propagate the religion of his / her choice but it is disconcerting that in matrimonial matters one party should change his / her faith to the other's just for the sake of matrimony and nothing more.”

The Single Bench drew a distinction between marriage and religion and said, “Marriage is one thing and religion quite another. If two citizens of India professing different religions wish to marry, it is open to them to do so under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which is one of the earliest endeavours towards a uniform Civil Code.”

On being asked by the court who the petitioner wanted to stay with, she stated that she wanted to live with her husband. The court while noting that she is a major said, “She has indicated her clear choice to stay with her husband with whom she claims to have married. She is a major and she is free to do so. She is free to stay with whomsoever she wants and go wherever she likes.”

The petitioner had converted to Islam before getting married this year and a petition was filed in the court alleging that she was illegally detained. The Allahabad High Court allowed her petition and ruled that she got married on her own volition and was free to exercise her choice.  

Recently, the Allahabad High Court had dismissed a writ petition filed by a married couple seeking police protection and direction to the respondent family to not interfere in their married life. The woman was a Muslim by birth and the court noted that she converted her religion to Hinduism a month before her marriage. This matter was heard before Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi of the Allahabad High Court in Priyanshi @ Km Shamreen and another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and others (W.P [Civ.] No. 14288 of 2020) on September 23, 2020.

The Single Bench had referred to Noor Jahan Begum @ Anjali Mishra and another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Others (W.P [Civ.] No. 57068 of 2014) in which, Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani of the Allahabad High Court had had dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by a couple to seek protection as they had tied the knot after the woman converted from Hinduism to Islam, and then performed the nikah. The court observed that conversion to Islam solely for marriage, without any real change of belief is neither bonafide nor valid.

Justice Surya Prakash opined that, “A conversion of religion by an individual to Islam can be said to be bonafide if he/she is major and of sound mind and embraces Islam by his/her own freewill and because of his/her faith and belief in the oneness of God (Allah) and prophetic character of Mohamed. If a conversion is not inspired by religion feeling and under gone for its own sake, but is resorted merely with object of creating a ground for some claim of right or as a device adopted for the purpose to avoid marriage or to achieve an object without faith and belief in the unity of God (Allah) and Mohamed to be his prophet, the conversion shall not be bonafide. In case of a religion conversion there should be a change of heart and honest conviction in the tenets of new religion in lieu of tenets of the original religion.”

The order dated October 8, 2020 may be read here:

 

Related:

Secularism or conversion

BJP spokesperson calls consensual marriage ‘love jihad’

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020

Archives