Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Communalism Hate Speech

The ruling is surprising and disappointing: Brinda Karat on Hate Speech Case Dismissal

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dismissed the application on the technicality, that prior Govt sanction is needed for prosecution of the respondents, who MPs

Sabrangindia 27 Aug 2020

Image Courtesy:muslimmirror.com

“The ruling is surprising and disappointing,” stated CPI(M) Polit Bureau Member, Brinda Karat, in reaction to the hate speech case against Bharatiya Janata Party politicians Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma being dismissed by a Magistrate Court in Delhi. In January, Karat had filed a complaint against the hate speeches made by BJP leaders Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma and asked Delhi police for filing a First Information Report (FIR) under relevant sections, including Sec 153 a IPC. After the Police refused to respond, an application was filed in the appropriate Magistrate's Court, as per procedure.

Karat states that “the court heard full arguments from our side as the complainants, as well as from the Delhi Police who argued that no cognizable offence was made out. Judgement was reserved but since others went to the High Court it was delayed. Now that HC asked the magistrate to dispose of the application, at this stage to rule that prior sanction even to direct registration of a FIR is required under Section 196 of CrPC is most surprising. The police had not raised this objection. Why hear arguments on merits then? Why not hold this at the threshold in February?” She has called this an “unfair judicial process which has resulted in excusing those who make hate speeches even where there is prima facie evidence.”

The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate  Vishal Pahuja dismissed Brinda Karat’s application on a technicality. It was noted that for prosecution of the respondents, who are Members of Parliament, the prior sanction of the Central government, was required under Section 196 CrPC.

According to a news report in the Indian Express, during arguments, Karat’s legal team was asked if they had procured sanction, they replied in the negative, and the court noted: “Admittedly, there is no previous sanction obtained by the complainants from the competent authority to prosecute the respondents for offences alleged in the complaint. Hence, in view of the settled position of law… the complaint deserves to be dismissed for being not tenable in the eyes of law. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed.”

The news report added that the counsel for the complainant had argued that “sanction is only required before taking cognizance by the court and not before passing of order of registration of FIR…”

 

Related:

Delhi HC again adjourns petition about police accountability for ‘indiscriminate’ 
Delhi violence: LG order appointing MHA picked officers way to defend the 
Is Delhi Police hiding key information, documents of riot cases?
Brinda Karat files police complaint against IPS Nageswar Rao

The ruling is surprising and disappointing: Brinda Karat on Hate Speech Case Dismissal

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dismissed the application on the technicality, that prior Govt sanction is needed for prosecution of the respondents, who MPs

Image Courtesy:muslimmirror.com

“The ruling is surprising and disappointing,” stated CPI(M) Polit Bureau Member, Brinda Karat, in reaction to the hate speech case against Bharatiya Janata Party politicians Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma being dismissed by a Magistrate Court in Delhi. In January, Karat had filed a complaint against the hate speeches made by BJP leaders Anurag Thakur and Parvesh Verma and asked Delhi police for filing a First Information Report (FIR) under relevant sections, including Sec 153 a IPC. After the Police refused to respond, an application was filed in the appropriate Magistrate's Court, as per procedure.

Karat states that “the court heard full arguments from our side as the complainants, as well as from the Delhi Police who argued that no cognizable offence was made out. Judgement was reserved but since others went to the High Court it was delayed. Now that HC asked the magistrate to dispose of the application, at this stage to rule that prior sanction even to direct registration of a FIR is required under Section 196 of CrPC is most surprising. The police had not raised this objection. Why hear arguments on merits then? Why not hold this at the threshold in February?” She has called this an “unfair judicial process which has resulted in excusing those who make hate speeches even where there is prima facie evidence.”

The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate  Vishal Pahuja dismissed Brinda Karat’s application on a technicality. It was noted that for prosecution of the respondents, who are Members of Parliament, the prior sanction of the Central government, was required under Section 196 CrPC.

According to a news report in the Indian Express, during arguments, Karat’s legal team was asked if they had procured sanction, they replied in the negative, and the court noted: “Admittedly, there is no previous sanction obtained by the complainants from the competent authority to prosecute the respondents for offences alleged in the complaint. Hence, in view of the settled position of law… the complaint deserves to be dismissed for being not tenable in the eyes of law. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed.”

The news report added that the counsel for the complainant had argued that “sanction is only required before taking cognizance by the court and not before passing of order of registration of FIR…”

 

Related:

Delhi HC again adjourns petition about police accountability for ‘indiscriminate’ 
Delhi violence: LG order appointing MHA picked officers way to defend the 
Is Delhi Police hiding key information, documents of riot cases?
Brinda Karat files police complaint against IPS Nageswar Rao

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives