SC castigates Police, extends House Arrest of Activists
The Supreme Court hearing the petition challenging arrest of five human rights activists has come down heavily on the police for insinuating that the court should not have interfered with the police investigation. "Justice DY Chandrachud tore into the police for casting aspersions on Supreme Court," said Lara Jesani, PUCL activist and Bombay High Court lawyer. "I saw Assistant Police Commissioner, Pune insinuating that SC should not have intervened at this stage. He has no business telling that", Justice Chandrachud said to Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. He also slammed the police for “ruining people’s reputation.”
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud was hearing the matter today. Adjourning the case till Wednesday, September 12 the SC directed that the activists also remain under house arrest till then.
Senior Advocate Harish Salve appeared for complainant in Supreme Court and said Magistrate should hear the matter. The counsel appearing for petitioners however, asked for “an independent enquiry [into the matter] by a Special Investigation Team constituted by the court.”
The ASG said, “third parties have no right to file the petition”, according to Live Law. He reportedly, also said, “Rushing to Supreme Court in such matters will create a bad precedent,” and that “law should take its own course.”
Earlier, prominent Indians from across the political spectrum, historian Romila Thapar, academic Devaki Jain, left economist, professor Prabhat Patnaik, professor of sociology Satish Deshpande and human rights lawyer, Maja Daruwala had approached the SC urging that the highest court intervene and seek an explanation from the Maharashtra government on the recent spate of arrests of lawyers, academics and activists. The petition had argued that the five persons arrested [and currently under house arrest] were persons of eminence and noted human rights activists merely exercising their right to dissent. The petition stated that none of the persons arrested were even present at the Bhima Koregaon rally (or meeting) held in Bhima Koregaon and Pune respectively on December 31, 2017 and January 2018. The deliberate inclusion of the draconian provisions of the UAPA are meant only to deny basic freedoms and terrorise the populations, the SC was told.
In the first hearing on the petition on August 29, the court had asked the Maharashtra state government to respond to the petition and also asked for allegations and materials against the accused. It had also permitted the accused to file rejoinders and adjourned the matter till September 6.
The Maharashtra government had filed a counter affidavit on September 5 in the matter concerning the arrests of five intellectuals/activists allegedly in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence asking to send them to police custody wanting to interrogate them “in accordance with law” It also claimed that the five arrested activists were planning “large scale violence.” The police had accused them of having connections with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).
The police, in its affidavit had also said that Elgaar was a “corrupted” version of Yalgaar, which means attack. Interestingly, the police’s affidavit found no mention of the much hyped and highly questionable ‘letters’ which were flashed in the media immediately in the aftermath of the arrest. The letters were said to have mentioned some “PM assassination plot.” None of this was mentioned in the affidavit and the police repeatedly said they had found ‘incriminating evidence’ during the video-graphed search operations from activists’ place. But the contents of this evidence has not been mentioned so far.
Calling Romila Thapar and the other four petitioners “strangers” and unconnected to the case, the affidavit had said that the writ petition filed was not maintainable either under Article 32 of the Constitution of India or otherwise.
Meanwhile, Senior Counsel and Supreme Court Lawyer Indira Jaisingh has got the permission to file petition for house arrest of Surendra Gadling on behalf of his wife.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud was hearing the matter today. Adjourning the case till Wednesday, September 12 the SC directed that the activists also remain under house arrest till then.
Senior Advocate Harish Salve appeared for complainant in Supreme Court and said Magistrate should hear the matter. The counsel appearing for petitioners however, asked for “an independent enquiry [into the matter] by a Special Investigation Team constituted by the court.”
The ASG said, “third parties have no right to file the petition”, according to Live Law. He reportedly, also said, “Rushing to Supreme Court in such matters will create a bad precedent,” and that “law should take its own course.”
Earlier, prominent Indians from across the political spectrum, historian Romila Thapar, academic Devaki Jain, left economist, professor Prabhat Patnaik, professor of sociology Satish Deshpande and human rights lawyer, Maja Daruwala had approached the SC urging that the highest court intervene and seek an explanation from the Maharashtra government on the recent spate of arrests of lawyers, academics and activists. The petition had argued that the five persons arrested [and currently under house arrest] were persons of eminence and noted human rights activists merely exercising their right to dissent. The petition stated that none of the persons arrested were even present at the Bhima Koregaon rally (or meeting) held in Bhima Koregaon and Pune respectively on December 31, 2017 and January 2018. The deliberate inclusion of the draconian provisions of the UAPA are meant only to deny basic freedoms and terrorise the populations, the SC was told.
In the first hearing on the petition on August 29, the court had asked the Maharashtra state government to respond to the petition and also asked for allegations and materials against the accused. It had also permitted the accused to file rejoinders and adjourned the matter till September 6.
The Maharashtra government had filed a counter affidavit on September 5 in the matter concerning the arrests of five intellectuals/activists allegedly in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence asking to send them to police custody wanting to interrogate them “in accordance with law” It also claimed that the five arrested activists were planning “large scale violence.” The police had accused them of having connections with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).
The police, in its affidavit had also said that Elgaar was a “corrupted” version of Yalgaar, which means attack. Interestingly, the police’s affidavit found no mention of the much hyped and highly questionable ‘letters’ which were flashed in the media immediately in the aftermath of the arrest. The letters were said to have mentioned some “PM assassination plot.” None of this was mentioned in the affidavit and the police repeatedly said they had found ‘incriminating evidence’ during the video-graphed search operations from activists’ place. But the contents of this evidence has not been mentioned so far.
Calling Romila Thapar and the other four petitioners “strangers” and unconnected to the case, the affidavit had said that the writ petition filed was not maintainable either under Article 32 of the Constitution of India or otherwise.
SC castigates Police, extends House Arrest of Activists
The Supreme Court hearing the petition challenging arrest of five human rights activists has come down heavily on the police for insinuating that the court should not have interfered with the police investigation. "Justice DY Chandrachud tore into the police for casting aspersions on Supreme Court," said Lara Jesani, PUCL activist and Bombay High Court lawyer. "I saw Assistant Police Commissioner, Pune insinuating that SC should not have intervened at this stage. He has no business telling that", Justice Chandrachud said to Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. He also slammed the police for “ruining people’s reputation.”
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud was hearing the matter today. Adjourning the case till Wednesday, September 12 the SC directed that the activists also remain under house arrest till then.
Senior Advocate Harish Salve appeared for complainant in Supreme Court and said Magistrate should hear the matter. The counsel appearing for petitioners however, asked for “an independent enquiry [into the matter] by a Special Investigation Team constituted by the court.”
The ASG said, “third parties have no right to file the petition”, according to Live Law. He reportedly, also said, “Rushing to Supreme Court in such matters will create a bad precedent,” and that “law should take its own course.”
Earlier, prominent Indians from across the political spectrum, historian Romila Thapar, academic Devaki Jain, left economist, professor Prabhat Patnaik, professor of sociology Satish Deshpande and human rights lawyer, Maja Daruwala had approached the SC urging that the highest court intervene and seek an explanation from the Maharashtra government on the recent spate of arrests of lawyers, academics and activists. The petition had argued that the five persons arrested [and currently under house arrest] were persons of eminence and noted human rights activists merely exercising their right to dissent. The petition stated that none of the persons arrested were even present at the Bhima Koregaon rally (or meeting) held in Bhima Koregaon and Pune respectively on December 31, 2017 and January 2018. The deliberate inclusion of the draconian provisions of the UAPA are meant only to deny basic freedoms and terrorise the populations, the SC was told.
In the first hearing on the petition on August 29, the court had asked the Maharashtra state government to respond to the petition and also asked for allegations and materials against the accused. It had also permitted the accused to file rejoinders and adjourned the matter till September 6.
The Maharashtra government had filed a counter affidavit on September 5 in the matter concerning the arrests of five intellectuals/activists allegedly in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence asking to send them to police custody wanting to interrogate them “in accordance with law” It also claimed that the five arrested activists were planning “large scale violence.” The police had accused them of having connections with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).
The police, in its affidavit had also said that Elgaar was a “corrupted” version of Yalgaar, which means attack. Interestingly, the police’s affidavit found no mention of the much hyped and highly questionable ‘letters’ which were flashed in the media immediately in the aftermath of the arrest. The letters were said to have mentioned some “PM assassination plot.” None of this was mentioned in the affidavit and the police repeatedly said they had found ‘incriminating evidence’ during the video-graphed search operations from activists’ place. But the contents of this evidence has not been mentioned so far.
Calling Romila Thapar and the other four petitioners “strangers” and unconnected to the case, the affidavit had said that the writ petition filed was not maintainable either under Article 32 of the Constitution of India or otherwise.
Meanwhile, Senior Counsel and Supreme Court Lawyer Indira Jaisingh has got the permission to file petition for house arrest of Surendra Gadling on behalf of his wife.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud was hearing the matter today. Adjourning the case till Wednesday, September 12 the SC directed that the activists also remain under house arrest till then.
Senior Advocate Harish Salve appeared for complainant in Supreme Court and said Magistrate should hear the matter. The counsel appearing for petitioners however, asked for “an independent enquiry [into the matter] by a Special Investigation Team constituted by the court.”
The ASG said, “third parties have no right to file the petition”, according to Live Law. He reportedly, also said, “Rushing to Supreme Court in such matters will create a bad precedent,” and that “law should take its own course.”
Earlier, prominent Indians from across the political spectrum, historian Romila Thapar, academic Devaki Jain, left economist, professor Prabhat Patnaik, professor of sociology Satish Deshpande and human rights lawyer, Maja Daruwala had approached the SC urging that the highest court intervene and seek an explanation from the Maharashtra government on the recent spate of arrests of lawyers, academics and activists. The petition had argued that the five persons arrested [and currently under house arrest] were persons of eminence and noted human rights activists merely exercising their right to dissent. The petition stated that none of the persons arrested were even present at the Bhima Koregaon rally (or meeting) held in Bhima Koregaon and Pune respectively on December 31, 2017 and January 2018. The deliberate inclusion of the draconian provisions of the UAPA are meant only to deny basic freedoms and terrorise the populations, the SC was told.
In the first hearing on the petition on August 29, the court had asked the Maharashtra state government to respond to the petition and also asked for allegations and materials against the accused. It had also permitted the accused to file rejoinders and adjourned the matter till September 6.
The Maharashtra government had filed a counter affidavit on September 5 in the matter concerning the arrests of five intellectuals/activists allegedly in connection with the Bhima Koregaon violence asking to send them to police custody wanting to interrogate them “in accordance with law” It also claimed that the five arrested activists were planning “large scale violence.” The police had accused them of having connections with the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).
The police, in its affidavit had also said that Elgaar was a “corrupted” version of Yalgaar, which means attack. Interestingly, the police’s affidavit found no mention of the much hyped and highly questionable ‘letters’ which were flashed in the media immediately in the aftermath of the arrest. The letters were said to have mentioned some “PM assassination plot.” None of this was mentioned in the affidavit and the police repeatedly said they had found ‘incriminating evidence’ during the video-graphed search operations from activists’ place. But the contents of this evidence has not been mentioned so far.
Calling Romila Thapar and the other four petitioners “strangers” and unconnected to the case, the affidavit had said that the writ petition filed was not maintainable either under Article 32 of the Constitution of India or otherwise.
Related articles
Related Articles
Freedom
Gauhati HC overturns FT order, declares man to be Indian citizen
The court observed that failure to disclose the names of all the members of the family cannot weaken his case and render his evidence unreliable
Freedom
Gauhati HC overturns FT order, declares man to be Indian citizen
The court observed that failure to disclose the names of all the members of the family cannot weaken his case and render his evidence unreliable
Theme
In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020
A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
The Lemmings of Hashimpura
Campaigns
Alternate News Network
30 Sep 2020
Videos
Communalism
Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?
In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.
Communalism
Gyanvapi controversy manufactured for political gain?
In wake of the ongoing controversy surrounding the Kashi Vishwanath temple - Gyanvapi mosque compound in Varanasi, watch this video and an exclusive interview of Maulana SM Yaseen, of Gyanvapi Mosque, conducted by senior research scholar Muniza Khan.
Archives
IN FACT
Podcasts
Podcasts
Podcasts
Analysis
In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020
A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
The Lemmings of Hashimpura
Rule of Law
Delhi violence: HC grants bail to two murder accused, doubts eye witness allegations
Sabrangindia 13 Apr 2021
Health
SC judges to work from home after half the court’s staff tests Covid positive
