Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Health Rule of Law

SC refuses to restrain media from reporting HC oral remarks in EC plea

The apex court also defended the high court judges while observing that they are working late nights and they are overwhelmed and asked EC to take the HC comments in the right spirit

Sabrangindia 04 May 2021

ECI

While hearing a plea filed by the Election Commission of India about oral remarks passed by Madras High Court, the apex court said that it cannot stop the media from reporting such remarks. The Bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice MR Shah observed that unfolding of debate in a court of law is important and the media has a duty to report. The bench also defended the high court judges stating that what is happening on the ground is bound to affect them and such comments are part of a dialogue and should be taken in the right spirit.

The EC filed a Special leave Petition before the Supreme Court against the oral remarks made by Madras High Court that EC officials should be booked for murder, after which several FIRs were also filed against the EC. When the same grievance was raised before the Madras High Court, it did not find it imperative to deal with the issue at that point, “The post-mortem on either count may have to wait, particularly in the light of the immediate measures that may be put in place.”

Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi appearing for EC submitted that without any pleading or evidence as to who is responsible for implementation of guidelines, the EC was castigated. When Dwivedi argued that all queries by the bench have to be in context of the matter, the court defended them saying, “Sometimes they are frustrated, they are angered. You should accept it in the right spirit. They are also human beings. Your subsequent decisions after the remarks matter.”

When Dwivedi pointed towards the comment of Madras High Court that EC officials should be charged with murder, Justice Chandrachud said, “We don’t want to demoralise the HC. They are vital pillars of the judicial process. Understand the perspective… It’s a free-flowing conversation. Sometimes in this dialogue, it’s a human process. We respect the EC, don’t take it otherwise. This is not to belittle because ultimately democracy survives on the faith in the institutions.”

The court held that sometimes judges say things spontaneously and they can “say something if they observe something. They have experience”. When Dwivedi pointed out that the harsh criticism has to stop, Justice Shah retorted, “Harsh criticism is because we want orders to be followed. Sometimes orders are not followed. Last week, people died in fire in Gujarat, the HC can say anything looking at the hard realities.”

The court further said while it understands the grievance of the EC, both the court and the EC were constitutional bodies and the EC cannot trench the court’s powers. “Everything that happens in the course of dialogue, ultimately the law is what is in the order,” the court reasoned.

The court ensured the EC that it will write a balanced order while preserving the strength of high courts and maintaining the sanctity of the EC.

Related:

Madras HC directs political parties to maintain discipline on counting day

Madras HC suggests considering RTI queries related to Covid be taken up everyday

I am not fully ‘woke’: Madras HC judge to start psychology sessions to understand same sex relationships

SC refuses to restrain media from reporting HC oral remarks in EC plea

The apex court also defended the high court judges while observing that they are working late nights and they are overwhelmed and asked EC to take the HC comments in the right spirit

ECI

While hearing a plea filed by the Election Commission of India about oral remarks passed by Madras High Court, the apex court said that it cannot stop the media from reporting such remarks. The Bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice MR Shah observed that unfolding of debate in a court of law is important and the media has a duty to report. The bench also defended the high court judges stating that what is happening on the ground is bound to affect them and such comments are part of a dialogue and should be taken in the right spirit.

The EC filed a Special leave Petition before the Supreme Court against the oral remarks made by Madras High Court that EC officials should be booked for murder, after which several FIRs were also filed against the EC. When the same grievance was raised before the Madras High Court, it did not find it imperative to deal with the issue at that point, “The post-mortem on either count may have to wait, particularly in the light of the immediate measures that may be put in place.”

Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi appearing for EC submitted that without any pleading or evidence as to who is responsible for implementation of guidelines, the EC was castigated. When Dwivedi argued that all queries by the bench have to be in context of the matter, the court defended them saying, “Sometimes they are frustrated, they are angered. You should accept it in the right spirit. They are also human beings. Your subsequent decisions after the remarks matter.”

When Dwivedi pointed towards the comment of Madras High Court that EC officials should be charged with murder, Justice Chandrachud said, “We don’t want to demoralise the HC. They are vital pillars of the judicial process. Understand the perspective… It’s a free-flowing conversation. Sometimes in this dialogue, it’s a human process. We respect the EC, don’t take it otherwise. This is not to belittle because ultimately democracy survives on the faith in the institutions.”

The court held that sometimes judges say things spontaneously and they can “say something if they observe something. They have experience”. When Dwivedi pointed out that the harsh criticism has to stop, Justice Shah retorted, “Harsh criticism is because we want orders to be followed. Sometimes orders are not followed. Last week, people died in fire in Gujarat, the HC can say anything looking at the hard realities.”

The court further said while it understands the grievance of the EC, both the court and the EC were constitutional bodies and the EC cannot trench the court’s powers. “Everything that happens in the course of dialogue, ultimately the law is what is in the order,” the court reasoned.

The court ensured the EC that it will write a balanced order while preserving the strength of high courts and maintaining the sanctity of the EC.

Related:

Madras HC directs political parties to maintain discipline on counting day

Madras HC suggests considering RTI queries related to Covid be taken up everyday

I am not fully ‘woke’: Madras HC judge to start psychology sessions to understand same sex relationships

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura

Archives