Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom Rule of Law

SC reserves order in Shaheen Bagh protest site eviction case

Petitioner had demanded that protesters be forcibly evicted as they were causing traffic blockage

Sabrangindia 21 Sep 2020

Shaheen Bagh

 

 The Supreme Court, on Monday, reserved judgment in a landmark case that examines the Right to Protest vis-à-vis the Right to Movement and Mobility. The case pertains to the peaceful sit-in protest organized at Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh earlier this year.

Advocate Amit Sahni had filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Delhi High Court earlier this year, stating that the closure of an arterial road due to the protest had adversely impacted mobility and cause inconvenience to people. Sahni had submitted that the Kalindi Kunj-Shahen Bagh stretch of the road that connects Delhi with Faridabad NOIDA was an important road, and its closure since December 15, 2019 had not only forced people to take long detours, but had also led to traffic congestion. But the Delhi HC had in January 2020, dismissed the plea saying it was the police’s responsibility to manage traffic and establish law and order.

The matter then went to the Supreme Court, that on February 17, 2020, appointed interlocutors to visit the protest site and submit a report. The interlocutors, Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde and Sadhana Ramachandran then visited Shaheen Bagh on February 19, 2020 and even spoke to several of the protesters. Thereafter they submitted their report in a sealed envelope to the court.

But the Covid-19 pandemic threw a spanner in the works, causing delays in the case, as well as eviction of protesters from the site due to fears to spread of infection.

When the case came up before Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul on September 21, 2020, the Solicitor General Tushar Mehta wondered if the matter would even survive now as the said premises had already been vacated, reported Bar and Bench. Advocate Shashank Deo Sudhi appearing for co-petitioner BJP MLA Nand Kishore Garg refused to withdraw his petition. Meanwhile, Amit Sahni also maintained that such protests cannot continue in future. Meanwhile Advocate Mahmood Pracha insisted that if protests were peaceful, no directions need be issued. SG Mehta then argued that the right to protest was not absolute.

The Supreme Court then reserved its order in the case.

 

Related:

How SC has balanced the right to protest v/s public inconvenience: Shaheen Bagh

Delhi HC dismisses PIL to reopen road near Shaheen Bagh

SC reserves order in Shaheen Bagh protest site eviction case

Petitioner had demanded that protesters be forcibly evicted as they were causing traffic blockage

Shaheen Bagh

 

 The Supreme Court, on Monday, reserved judgment in a landmark case that examines the Right to Protest vis-à-vis the Right to Movement and Mobility. The case pertains to the peaceful sit-in protest organized at Delhi’s Shaheen Bagh earlier this year.

Advocate Amit Sahni had filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Delhi High Court earlier this year, stating that the closure of an arterial road due to the protest had adversely impacted mobility and cause inconvenience to people. Sahni had submitted that the Kalindi Kunj-Shahen Bagh stretch of the road that connects Delhi with Faridabad NOIDA was an important road, and its closure since December 15, 2019 had not only forced people to take long detours, but had also led to traffic congestion. But the Delhi HC had in January 2020, dismissed the plea saying it was the police’s responsibility to manage traffic and establish law and order.

The matter then went to the Supreme Court, that on February 17, 2020, appointed interlocutors to visit the protest site and submit a report. The interlocutors, Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde and Sadhana Ramachandran then visited Shaheen Bagh on February 19, 2020 and even spoke to several of the protesters. Thereafter they submitted their report in a sealed envelope to the court.

But the Covid-19 pandemic threw a spanner in the works, causing delays in the case, as well as eviction of protesters from the site due to fears to spread of infection.

When the case came up before Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul on September 21, 2020, the Solicitor General Tushar Mehta wondered if the matter would even survive now as the said premises had already been vacated, reported Bar and Bench. Advocate Shashank Deo Sudhi appearing for co-petitioner BJP MLA Nand Kishore Garg refused to withdraw his petition. Meanwhile, Amit Sahni also maintained that such protests cannot continue in future. Meanwhile Advocate Mahmood Pracha insisted that if protests were peaceful, no directions need be issued. SG Mehta then argued that the right to protest was not absolute.

The Supreme Court then reserved its order in the case.

 

Related:

How SC has balanced the right to protest v/s public inconvenience: Shaheen Bagh

Delhi HC dismisses PIL to reopen road near Shaheen Bagh

Related Articles

Wednesday

14

Oct

11 am onwards

Not an Inch Back!

Main Gate KG-Campus

Friday

09

Oct

Albert Ekka Chowk, Ranchi

Monday

05

Oct

Valluvarkottam, Chennai

Theme

Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura
summer

Summer Culture

Our first summer culture bouquet features fiction from Syria and Iraq and poetry and art from Palestine.

Campaigns

Wednesday

14

Oct

11 am onwards

Not an Inch Back!

Main Gate KG-Campus

Friday

09

Oct

04 pm onwards

#IStandWithStanSwamy

Albert Ekka Chowk, Ranchi

Monday

05

Oct

Valluvarkottam, Chennai

Videos

India

I dissent! Digital Artist Bhawana takes on bigotry

How are Indian artists voicing dissent in dark times like these? Digital Artist Bhawna‘s work speaks of the difficult times we live in, hoping to spark a discourse among people. Watch the first part of this sabrangindia exclusive series called 'I Dissent! Artists who are taking on bigotry. #Artist #Resistance #Dissent

India

I dissent! Digital Artist Bhawana takes on bigotry

How are Indian artists voicing dissent in dark times like these? Digital Artist Bhawna‘s work speaks of the difficult times we live in, hoping to spark a discourse among people. Watch the first part of this sabrangindia exclusive series called 'I Dissent! Artists who are taking on bigotry. #Artist #Resistance #Dissent

IN FACT

Analysis

Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.
Delhi HC

Hate Speech and Delhi Pogrom 2020

A spate of provocative speeches, that amount to hate speech in law and should be prosecuted allowed blood letting to spill on the streets of north east Delhi in February-March 2020
hashimpura

Hashimpura Massacre

The Lemmings of Hashimpura
summer

Summer Culture

Our first summer culture bouquet features fiction from Syria and Iraq and poetry and art from Palestine.

Archives