Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Communalism Communal Organisations

Shia Waqf Board meets Hindu parties involved in Ayodhya case, reiterates support for Ram Mandir

Siddhant Mohan 04 Sep 2017
A month after the Shia Waqf Board tried to step into Babri Masjid-Ram Janmbhoomi dispute by declaring itself as one of the parties, members of the board met Hindu parties of the case and yet again urged the formation of Ram Temple at the disputed site.

Ram mandir
Image: India TV

On Eid Ul Adha, Syed Wasim Rizvi, the director at Shia Central Waqf Board, was in Ayodhya to meet Mahant Suresh Das, one of the parties advocating the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site.

The meet, which was done in the presence of the press, lent support to the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site. Rizvi also asked for the construction of mosque but at a resonable distance from the Ayodhya in some Muslim dominant locality.

Rizvi also said that since Babar was a “cruel Mughal emperor”, the mosque should not be named after him. He proposed the name “Masjid-e-Aman” for the mosque.

Since the formation of the new government in Uttar Pradesh, talks, rumours and negotiations have accelerated in reference to Ram Janmabhoomi. Several trucks loaded with stones have already reached Ayodhya in past few months and they are already being carved in the Karsewakpuram.

The meeting on Saturday was followed by another meeting on Sunday when Rizvi met Bhaskar Das and Dharm Das of Nirmohi Akhara, which is one of the parties in the same case, and Suresh Das of Digambar Akhara. In this meeting too, both sides mutually agreed and embraced the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site.

While Rizvi and the board are intervening in the matter in a personal capacity, the matter is currently under hearing in the Supreme Court of India. And as the matter is sub-Judice, the Sunni Central Waqf Board does not hold any influence in the issue.

A few days ago, Sunni Waqf Board’s chairman Zafar Ahmad Faruqi had condemned the practices of Rizvi and claimed that the Sunni Central Waqf Board is ready for mediation and talks but only with the original parties. Shia Waqf Board had also submitted an affidavit in the Supreme Court asking to be one of the parties in the case, which the court refused.

With Rizvi’s intervention in the case, a dispute historically seen as Hindu vs Muslim is turning into Hindu us Sunni vs Shia case. However, this development will please Hindu parties in the case as Santosh Das welcomed Rizvi’s remarks and said that if Muslims are supporting for temple construction, what could be more pleasing in the case.

About the meeting, Rizvi told TwoCircles.net, “The only peaceful solution to the whole problem is that Muslims should welcome the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site. Otherwise, there will always be a conflict between Hindus and Muslims.”

Rizvi, who is accused of creating differences among Shias and Sunnis, said, “Muslim population in Ayodhya is considerably low, and I think there are enough mosques for them in Ayodhya. Shia Waqf Board understands the need of a mosque, but that should be built at a far distance from the temple in a Muslim dominated locality.”

For Rizvi, the Sunni central waqf board does not hold any position in the case and stresses over the Shia Central Waqf Board as the main party.

He also said, “There are few ‘terrorist-like, ‘traitors’ and ‘Pakistan-funded’ Mullahs and Imams live in this country, who does not want a peaceful resolution in the case.”

Courtesy: Two Circles
 

Shia Waqf Board meets Hindu parties involved in Ayodhya case, reiterates support for Ram Mandir

A month after the Shia Waqf Board tried to step into Babri Masjid-Ram Janmbhoomi dispute by declaring itself as one of the parties, members of the board met Hindu parties of the case and yet again urged the formation of Ram Temple at the disputed site.

Ram mandir
Image: India TV

On Eid Ul Adha, Syed Wasim Rizvi, the director at Shia Central Waqf Board, was in Ayodhya to meet Mahant Suresh Das, one of the parties advocating the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site.

The meet, which was done in the presence of the press, lent support to the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site. Rizvi also asked for the construction of mosque but at a resonable distance from the Ayodhya in some Muslim dominant locality.

Rizvi also said that since Babar was a “cruel Mughal emperor”, the mosque should not be named after him. He proposed the name “Masjid-e-Aman” for the mosque.

Since the formation of the new government in Uttar Pradesh, talks, rumours and negotiations have accelerated in reference to Ram Janmabhoomi. Several trucks loaded with stones have already reached Ayodhya in past few months and they are already being carved in the Karsewakpuram.

The meeting on Saturday was followed by another meeting on Sunday when Rizvi met Bhaskar Das and Dharm Das of Nirmohi Akhara, which is one of the parties in the same case, and Suresh Das of Digambar Akhara. In this meeting too, both sides mutually agreed and embraced the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site.

While Rizvi and the board are intervening in the matter in a personal capacity, the matter is currently under hearing in the Supreme Court of India. And as the matter is sub-Judice, the Sunni Central Waqf Board does not hold any influence in the issue.

A few days ago, Sunni Waqf Board’s chairman Zafar Ahmad Faruqi had condemned the practices of Rizvi and claimed that the Sunni Central Waqf Board is ready for mediation and talks but only with the original parties. Shia Waqf Board had also submitted an affidavit in the Supreme Court asking to be one of the parties in the case, which the court refused.

With Rizvi’s intervention in the case, a dispute historically seen as Hindu vs Muslim is turning into Hindu us Sunni vs Shia case. However, this development will please Hindu parties in the case as Santosh Das welcomed Rizvi’s remarks and said that if Muslims are supporting for temple construction, what could be more pleasing in the case.

About the meeting, Rizvi told TwoCircles.net, “The only peaceful solution to the whole problem is that Muslims should welcome the construction of Ram Temple at the disputed site. Otherwise, there will always be a conflict between Hindus and Muslims.”

Rizvi, who is accused of creating differences among Shias and Sunnis, said, “Muslim population in Ayodhya is considerably low, and I think there are enough mosques for them in Ayodhya. Shia Waqf Board understands the need of a mosque, but that should be built at a far distance from the temple in a Muslim dominated locality.”

For Rizvi, the Sunni central waqf board does not hold any position in the case and stresses over the Shia Central Waqf Board as the main party.

He also said, “There are few ‘terrorist-like, ‘traitors’ and ‘Pakistan-funded’ Mullahs and Imams live in this country, who does not want a peaceful resolution in the case.”

Courtesy: Two Circles
 

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives