Skip to main content
Sabrang
Sabrang
Freedom Rule of Law

Tripura HC quashes FIR against man charged for misleading FB post about pro-CAA number

The BJP had introduced the phone number and appealed to people to give a missed call on it to register their support for CAA. The accused commented that if one calls on that number, their phone will get hacked.

Sabrangindia 01 Apr 2021

Tripura HC

The Tripura High Court has quashed an FIR filed against a man who made a misleading comment about BJP’s pro-CAA phone number. The bench of Chief Justice Akil Kureshi observed that the charges invoked against him do not apply in case of his alleged act and the ingredients of these offences are not fulfilled; thus the FIR was quashed.

The petitioner, Arindam Bhattacharjee, sought quashing of FIR registered against him for posting on Facebook that if one calls the number on which BJP asked people to give a missed call to draw support for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the data from their phone will get hacked. An FIR was registered by the police under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 153A (Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration) and 505 (statement concerning public mischief) of the IPC. It was alleged that the Facebook post instigated division amongst religious groups and created an environment of misinformation which was a public nuisance and he was spreading rumours, pursuant to a criminal conspiracy.

The petition was opposed by the public prosecutor stating that the petitioner is in the habit of posting incorrect and harmful comments against the members of the rival political party.

The court observed that the Facebook post in question would undoubtedly alarm the prospective callers and in many cases dissuade them from calling the said number but the court wished to examine whether it amounts to the offences invoked in the said FIR. Considering the offence of conspiracy, the court observed that the offence is wrongly applied as there is no clarity as to which offence the petitioner in consort with anyone else, agreed to do or caused to be done.

The court then considered the offence under section 153A of IPC and stated that the petitioner’s act does not fall within any of the clauses (a) to (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 153B. The court then went on to consider offence under section 505 of IPC and held that the contents of the post of the petitioner may be false, but it cannot be said that the same was posted with intent to incite or which is likely to incite any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community.

The court thus quashed the FIR and also expressed its surprise that the police did not apply any of these sections when a complaint was made against Amlan Mukherjee of putting a misleading post that one should call on that number for free subscription of Netflix.

The complete order may be read here:

 

Related:

Mere presence of accused at Red Fort cannot justify incarceration: Delhi court on R-Day violence

P&H High Court refuses bail to rape accused despite survivor’s “no objection” to bail

Protect arrestee’s human rights: Lawyers send open letter to UNHRC

Tripura HC quashes FIR against man charged for misleading FB post about pro-CAA number

The BJP had introduced the phone number and appealed to people to give a missed call on it to register their support for CAA. The accused commented that if one calls on that number, their phone will get hacked.

Tripura HC

The Tripura High Court has quashed an FIR filed against a man who made a misleading comment about BJP’s pro-CAA phone number. The bench of Chief Justice Akil Kureshi observed that the charges invoked against him do not apply in case of his alleged act and the ingredients of these offences are not fulfilled; thus the FIR was quashed.

The petitioner, Arindam Bhattacharjee, sought quashing of FIR registered against him for posting on Facebook that if one calls the number on which BJP asked people to give a missed call to draw support for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the data from their phone will get hacked. An FIR was registered by the police under sections 120B (criminal conspiracy), 153A (Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration) and 505 (statement concerning public mischief) of the IPC. It was alleged that the Facebook post instigated division amongst religious groups and created an environment of misinformation which was a public nuisance and he was spreading rumours, pursuant to a criminal conspiracy.

The petition was opposed by the public prosecutor stating that the petitioner is in the habit of posting incorrect and harmful comments against the members of the rival political party.

The court observed that the Facebook post in question would undoubtedly alarm the prospective callers and in many cases dissuade them from calling the said number but the court wished to examine whether it amounts to the offences invoked in the said FIR. Considering the offence of conspiracy, the court observed that the offence is wrongly applied as there is no clarity as to which offence the petitioner in consort with anyone else, agreed to do or caused to be done.

The court then considered the offence under section 153A of IPC and stated that the petitioner’s act does not fall within any of the clauses (a) to (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 153B. The court then went on to consider offence under section 505 of IPC and held that the contents of the post of the petitioner may be false, but it cannot be said that the same was posted with intent to incite or which is likely to incite any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community.

The court thus quashed the FIR and also expressed its surprise that the police did not apply any of these sections when a complaint was made against Amlan Mukherjee of putting a misleading post that one should call on that number for free subscription of Netflix.

The complete order may be read here:

 

Related:

Mere presence of accused at Red Fort cannot justify incarceration: Delhi court on R-Day violence

P&H High Court refuses bail to rape accused despite survivor’s “no objection” to bail

Protect arrestee’s human rights: Lawyers send open letter to UNHRC

Related Articles

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

Theme

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Campaigns

Sunday

03

Jan

Pan-India

Saturday

05

Dec

05 pm onwards

Rise in Rage!

North Gate, JNU campus

Thursday

26

Nov

10 am onwards

Delhi Chalo

Pan India

IN FACT

Analysis

Stop Hate

Hate and Harmony in 2021

A recap of all that transpired across India in terms of hate speech and even outright hate crimes, as well as the persecution of those who dared to speak up against hate. This disturbing harvest of hate should now push us to do more to forge harmony.
Taliban 2021

Taliban in Afghanistan: A look back

Communalism Combat had taken a deep dive into the lives of people of Afghanistan under the Taliban regime. Here we reproduce some of our archives documenting the plight of hapless Afghanis, especially women, who suffered the most under the hardline regime.
2020

Milestones 2020

In the year devastated by the Covid 19 Pandemic, India witnessed apathy against some of its most marginalised people and vilification of dissenters by powerful state and non state actors. As 2020 draws to a close, and hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers continue their protest in the bitter North Indian cold. Read how Indians resisted all attempts to snatch away fundamental and constitutional freedoms.
Migrant Diaries

Migrant Diaries

The 2020 COVID pandemic brought to fore the dismal lives that our migrant workers lead. Read these heartbreaking stories of how they lived before the pandemic, how the lockdown changed their lives and what they’re doing now.

Archives