Home Blog Page 1305

Towards an Organic unity of the marginalized: BAPSA and Fraternity Movement Form Alliance in JNUSU Elections

0

The JNU student community will elect a new student representative body tomorrow. The JNUSU election is happening at a critical juncture in the history of the university, where we witness an unprecedented assault on the education system in general and in universities in particular by the ruling right-winged BJP. The JNU VC, appointed to work for the BJP, is an example. The marginalized are facing institutional brutalities and manipulations at all levels under the BJP rule. The pertinent question now is how to fight and what should be the course of our struggle. In this context, the JNUSU election is not merely a mechanism for electing the representatives but a medium of an assertion of rights and dignity.


Image from twitter

The coming together of two prominent organisations in the JNU campus; i.e BAPSA and Fraternity Movement to contest the JNUSU Elections represents solidarity among oppressed identities and a call for a united struggle. Both the organisations have had a strong commitment towards fighting for the rights of oppressed identities in the University campuses and outside.
 

From the protests against the institutional murder of Rohith Vemula to the struggle to trace Najeeb who was forcibly made to disappear; to struggles for various structural issues of oppressed communities like viva voce discrimination, flouting of reservations, discrimination in higher education and so on, both JNUSU(Jawaharlal Nehru University Students’ Union) and BAPSA (Birsa Ambedkar Phule Students’ Association) have fought together.
 

In times of Hindutva Fascism, the oppressed are being routinely lynched and their voices are being muffled. The current regime is that of hate, contempt and oppression. In the name of caste, religion, communalism, cultural practices, food habits and so on, marginalised groups are being targeted. There are systematic attacks on the rights of the marginalised people — the Constitution which safeguards their rights is being subverted, the Parliamentary procedures and the spirit of the Constitution have been reduced to a joke. 

This can be witnessed through the way EWS reservations, abrogation of Article 370, Trans Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, amendments to the UAPA, NIA, etc. have been passed. A fear psychosis has been created through mob lynchings with impunity accorded to killers and lynchers as well as patronage from the current regime. Tabrez Ansari was brutally lynched. Pehlu Khan’s killers have been allowed to go scot-free. We have witnessed how 10 Adivasi farmers in Sonbhadra, UP were gunned down while they were fighting for their land.

 BJP/RSS combine has enabled, protected and supported rapists in the Kathua and Unnao cases. In such dark times where we are witnessing mass silencing of Kashmiris and their aspirations, lynchings that do not ever find justice, introduction of NRC, amendments to UAPA and the NIA act which will further place Muslims and other marginalised under the shadow of “terror”, Trans bill which violates human dignity and rights to trans persons, the oppressed need to unite and reclaim their rights and dignity themselves. 

Similar issues happening in the University campuses have also become battlegrounds for marginalised students to assert their rights. The Dalit and Muslims students on university campuses are facing perpetual threat and harassment when they ask academic questions on issues of social justice, or when they demand their fellowship. 

In a nutshell, the university space is hostile to those who are victims of face hate crimes and oppression by the state. The so-called progressive groups on university campuses have either remained mute spectators or have appropriated and patronized marginalised voices. In stark opposition to the politics of hate and mob lynching of the right-wing as well as the politics of appropriation and patronisation of the Left-wing, organisations like BAPSA and Fraternity Movement stand firm in their commitment to the politics of oppressed by the oppressed.  

We have seen in the recent past, how the unprecedented attack on the admission policy of JNU caused large sections of students to be deprived of admission on the pretext of the UGC Gazette

The UGC Gazette was defeated by the united struggles of students, wherein BAPSA took the lead in resisting the draconian Gazette both on campus as well as outside through recourse to legal action. 

This year, the University administration resorted to another tactic during admission, where they arbitrarily increased the intake of students to an extent that infrastructural lack and hostel availability are again threatening students, especially from marginalised communities. The lack of infrastructural and hostel facilities means that students coming from socio-economic margins will be forced to drop out of higher education. 
This year again there has been rampant discrimination in viva voce during M.Phil. and PhD admission procedures where students from marginalised communities have been given 3, 2, 1 and even 0.25 marks out of 30. These measures are nothing but different ways of targeting these students. OBC communities, while being in largest numbers, have the least representation in universities like JNU and other educational and public-private institutions. There has been gross negligence in implementing the OBC reservation in JNU faculty recruitments where the Left has been in power for over 40 years. 

The same Left parties could not play an active role, neither in finding Najeeb nor in punishing the ABVP cadres, the RSS-affiliated Students’ body, but moreover their complicity in accusing Najeeb as the ‘criminal’ made things more favourable for the culprits.

The BAPSA – Fraternity Movement Alliance is contesting in the posts of President and General Secretary as well as in School Counsellor positions. Jitendra Suna -the Presidential Candidate- is a Research Scholar at Centre for the Study of Discrimination and Exclusion (CSDE). In 2009, he worked as a helper with Indraprastha Gas Ltd (IGL) in the capital, fitting gas pipelines, fixing stoves and digging roads in case of pipe bursts. He belongs to Ganda (Dom) Caste of Dalits from Pourkela village in the backward Kalahandi district of Odisha. 

Waseem RS – Candidate for General Secretary Post – is a PhD Research Fellow at the Centre for the Study of Law and Governance. He completed M.Phil on UAPA cases in Kerala and currently working in the topic ‘Law and Literature in Novels”. He belongs to OBC Mappila Muslim community of Kozhikode, Northern Kerala. He is the first generation researcher from his community, thanks to the implementation of the Mandal Committee Report in 2006. He is a leading figure in the protests for justice for Rohit Vemula and Najeeb Ahmad. He is former National Secretary of Fraternity Movement.  BAPSA-Fraternity Alliance candidates are also contesting for councillor posts in SIS (Hirok Jyoti Ray, Praveen Bharti, Umar Faruk M), SSS (Amisha Singh, Mungamuri Kranthi Kumar, Sonali Kale), SLL & CS (Afreen Fatima) and SAA (Aakanksha Aditi) Schools.

BAPSA and Fraternity are striving to create an alternative discourse which goes beyond rhetoric and to wage struggle on the ground. Their coming together represents a step in forging a unity of the oppressed. This solidarity is based on the need to forge a larger unity of oppressed communities who are facing discriminations and oppression on grounds of gender, language, caste, race, religion, region, colour, and class. 
While analyzing the dubious Left Unity during JNUSU elections, Jadumanilion Mahanand opines that “the Left has created the binary of class and caste, and that caste is under the carpet of class. Caste is a social-political capital to perpetuate Brahminism, which in other words can be termed as “Caste Capitalism”. Jitendra Suna (the Presidential Candidate) is the real proletariat fighting against Brahmanism, class inequality, and gender justice. Only a person who has experienced humiliation and exploitation of caste and class can be a genuine and authentic representative of a movement against a hegemonic State.” 

This alliance has a historical precedence as Waseem RS, the General Secretary Candidate observed in his Debate, that “it has been developed through the ages from the mutual support of Savitri Bhai Phule and Fatima Shaikh, Ambedkar and the Muslim League, the Mandal Commission Movements, Abdul Nasar Madani’s activities, the united solidarity of Prakash Ambedkar and Asadullah Owaisi etc,.” In the backdrop of overwhelming victory of NDA for the second term during the Parliament elections, this student-level alliance will provide much more open and flexible political formulas for the marginalized communities across the Indian political sphere.
 
Author Info: Hisham ul wahab P is a Research Fellow, Centre for West Asian Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He can be reached at: hishamulwahab@gmail.com

Courtesy: Two Circle

Making of a Prison: Kashmir

0

This is the worst lockdown the Valley has witnessed in decades.

As the central government cut off all forms of communication, imposed severe travel restrictions and detained more than 300 political leaders and activists across Kashmir on August 5, we take a look at a series of photos that show what Kashmir has faced from January this year until August 5, when it lost its statehood. This is the worst lockdown the Valley has witnessed in decades.

Courtesy: News Click

The Story of ‘Two Temples’ and Mid-day Meal

0

At one place, they demolished a mosque and are trying to build the Ram Mandir in its place.

At one place, they demolished a mosque and are trying to build the Ram Mandir in its place. At another place, they demolished the centuries-old Ravidas temple, which contradicts their overwhelming love for temples. And these same people are serving salt-roti as mid-day meal to children in schools. An FIR was lodged against the journalist who exposed them. Senior journalist Urmilesh talks about this political hypocrisy.

Courtesy: News Click

RTI info on Electronic Voting Machines would ‘endanger’ life of engineers: BEL

0

In a surprise move, one of India’s top electronics public sector undertakings, Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL), has refused to disclose details under the Right to Information (RTI) Act about Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter Verified Paper Trail (VVPAT), used by the Election Commission of India (ECI) for voting across India, stating that such a disclosure “would endanger the life of its engineers.”

Ironically, in June this year, the ECI took an identical view while refusing to disclose under the RTI Act details of the dissent notes of its Commissioner Ashok Lavasa on decisions pertaining to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s speeches, which were alleged to have violated model code, saying it may “endanger the life or physical safety” of an individual.

Top RTI activist Venkatesh Nayak, who is with the advocacy group Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), had sought information on EVM and VVPAT following “scanty information” about the manner in which polls were conducted across India in April-May 2019 general elections, which returned the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government to power with a thumping majority.

Dissatisfied, says Nayak in an email alert to Counterview, several private citizens and mediapersons used RTI to seek information about voter turnout data mismatch, complaints about EVMs malfunctioning, complaints about mismatch of EVMs and VVPAT printouts, movement of EVMs and VVPATs to the electoral constituencies from the manufacturing companies, and details of action taken on complaints received against high profile politicians for violating the Model Code of Conduct.

After many of these requests were turned down by relevant public authorities, Nayak asserts, on June 17, 2019, he decided to file two identical RTI applications seeking information from BEL, as also the Electronics Corporation of India Ltd (ECIL), the two manufacturers of the voting machines.

ECIL, says Nayak, “Uploaded some of this information on the RTI Online Facility but rejected access to some crucial bits of information sought in my RTI application”, but has not received “a formal reply from ECIL.”

As for BEL, Nayak says, initially, the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of BEL “sent a fee intimation letter for Rs 1,434 for a total of 717 pages after almost a month”, agreeing to “supply most of the information”, even though denying “access to the VVPAT patent application filed with the Office of the Controller General of Patents by citing Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act.”
 

How could BEL say it did not have necessary information on EVMs, VVATs? Which papers did they count before sending the reply that information was contained in 717 pages?

After sending a draft of Rs 1,434 and waiting for 40 days, when Nayak did not hear from the BEL CPIO, on August 28, 2019, he filed an appeal under the RTI Act challenging the non-supply of information, to which, the CPIO, who immediately sent in a reply, returning the bank draft and “claimed that BEL did not have most of the information sought which he had agreed to supply in his first reply”.

The reply particularly said that the disclosure of information would “endanger the life or physical safety of engineers who carried out the assignment related to preparation of EVMs and VVPATs”, hence it was being “denied under section (8(1)(g) of the RTI Act, 2005.” 

Wondering how could CPIO say that he did not have necessary information, asks Nayak, “Which papers did he count before sending the first reply?”, suspecting, the latest reply is “an afterthought arising out of pressure exerted – probably by an external agency against making this information public.”

Nayak says, refusal to part with information under the RTI Act runs counter to what the Union Minister of State for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions said about the NDA government’s commitment to transparency while replying to the debate on the Bill to amend The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) in the Lok Sabha on July 22, 2019.

Referring to RTI, the minister claimed that the government “has been absolutely committed, as in other wings of governance, to ensure full transparency and full accountability”. Comments Nayak, “Sadly, this governance philosophy does not seem to have percolated downwards beyond the corridors of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) with which the Union Minister is associated.”

Courtesy: Counter View