Celebrity MPs: Lower Attendance, Fewer Debates & Questions

May 8, 2019

Mumbai: Celebrity Members of Parliament (MPs)–film artistes and singers–logged lower attendance, participated in fewer debates, asked fewer questions but used their constituency development funds better than the average of all MPs in the 16th Lok Sabha, our analysis of track records of 19 such MPs shows.

On average, the 19 celebrity MPs logged 66% attendance compared to the 16th Lok Sabha average of 80%, an IndiaSpend analysis of parliament data shows. Only six celebrity MPs marked attendance of 80% or above. Bharatiya Janata Party MP and yesteryears’ star Hema Malini, who pretended to plough a farm during an election photoshoot, logged 39% attendance.

Of parliamentary debates, celebrity MPs on average participated in 22 against the 16th Lok Sabha average of 67, with only one MP reporting higher (participation in 107 debates). On average, celebrity MPs asked 101 questions, while all MPs together asked an average of 293. BJP MP Shatrughan Sinha, also a yesteryears’ film star and now with the Congress party, took part in no debate and asked no questions.

At the same time, celebrity MPs utilised their Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) funds better than all MPs’ average–87.6% compared to 82.9%, as on April 5, 2019. Each MP is allocated Rs 5 crore per year of their tenure for development to recommend works in the districts under their constituency to the district collector.

Film personalities are common in politics, and increasingly visible in campaigning as also contesting elections due to the attention they attract on social media.

Some of the prominent first-timer celebrities contesting the 2019 Lok Sabha elections include actors Sunny Deol, Urmila Matondkar and Prakash Raj and the singer Hans Raj Hans.

IndiaSpend assessed the performance of 19 such celebrities by their participation in parliamentary proceedings–debates, questions, private member bills, government bills, and so on.

These MPs were selected based on their profession as stated in their profile–‘Actor, Comedian’, ‘Actress in Film/Theatre/Television’, ‘Artist’, ‘Artist (Singer)’, ‘Bhojpuri Singer’, ‘Film Artist’ and ‘Performing Artiste’.

Source: Lok Sabha 1, 2, 3; MPLADS
Note: Attendance and business participation of a member of parliament as ministers is not accounted for. Babul Supriyo, BJP MP from Asansol, West Bengal, was appointed as the union minister of state in the ministry of urban development, and in ministry of housing and urban poverty alleviation on November 9, 2014. On July 12, 2016, he was appointed as the union minister of state for the ministry of heavy industries and public enterprises. *Supriyo signed the attendance register for 15 of 33 sittings before he was appointed as the minister.
Ramsinh Pataliyabhai Rathwa, BJP MP from Chhota Udaipur, Gujarat, is a (fine arts) artist, hence not included in the list.

Attendance below average

The 16th Lok Sabha sat for a total of 331 days from June 2014 to February 2019. The average attendance of all MPs was 80%, an analysis by PRS Legislative shows. Celebrity MPs, by contrast, had 66% attendance on average.

Among the celebrity MPs, actor George Baker reported the maximum (98%) attendance. Baker, an Assamese and Bengali film actor, is a nominated MP–nominated from West Bengal by the BJP as a member of the Anglo-Indian community on July 23, 2015. He assumed office on August 10, 2015, attending 223 of 228 days during his term.

BJP MP Sharadkumar Bansode from Maharashtra’s Solapur constituency, formerly a Marathi film actor and now an advocate, reported 93% attendance (307 of 331 days).

Logging a better attendance record were film artist and Bhojpuri singer Chhotelal (88%), Telugu film actor Murali Mohan Maganti (85%) and film and television actor Kirron Kher (84%).

Deepak (Dev) Adhikari, a Bengali film actor, from West Bengal’s Ghatal constituency who represents the All India Trinamool Congress, reported the least (11%) attendance. Other MPs in the list with low attendance include Bollywood film actor Hema Malini (39%), Bengali actor Tapas Paul (47%), Bengali actor Sandhya Roy (53%) and Punjabi actor and comedian Bhagwant Mann (56%).

Low participation in parliamentary business

From the celebrity list, BJP MP from Chandigarh, Kirron Kher, asked the maximum (335) questions, above the 16th Lok Sabha average of 293.

Telugu film actor Murali Mohan Maganti from Rajahmundry in Andhra Pradesh was next with 267 questions, followed by Bhojpuri singer and actor Manoj Tiwari (258), George Baker (255), and actor Innocent (217) who is primarily known for his works in Malayalam cinema.

Moon Moon Sen, an actor primarily known for her works in Bengali cinema, Odia film actor Sidhant Mohapatra and Shatrughan Sinha did not ask a single question in their five-year terms.

Bhagwant Mann participated in the most debates, 107, above the 16th Lok Sabha average of 67.

Mann was followed by Murali Mohan Maganti (55), Kirron Kher (44), Innocent (40) and George Baker (33), all below the national average.
While Shatrughan Sinha did not participate in any debate, Moon Moon Sen participated in one, the least among the 19 celebrity MPs.

Better MPLADS utilisation

MPs in the 16th Lok Sabha utilised 85% of the developmental funds they were allocated, leaving 15% unutilised–Rs 1,806.08 crore of the total amount of Rs 12,051.36 crore, IndiaSpend reported on April 6, 2019.

Sandhya Roy reported the maximum (98.8%) utilisation of MPLADS funds among the 19 celebrity MPs, as on April 5, 2019, higher than the average.

Deepak (Dev) Adhikari (96.7%) was next in the celebrity list after Roy, followed by Satabdi (Banerjee) Roy (95.6%), an actor known for her work in Bengali cinema, Kirron Kher (91.2%) and Shatrughan Sinha (91.1%). Babul Supriyo reported the least (74.1%) utilisation of MPLAD funds.

(Mallapur is a senior policy analyst with IndiaSpend. With data inputs by Faizi Noor Ahmad, an intern with IndiaSpend.)

Courtesy: India Spend

Jharkhand’s second round goes to Mahagathbandhan, the alliance is strong on 3 out of 4 seats

May 8, 2019

The arithmetic of Mahagathbandhan seems to be working on ground level, as in the second phase of polls in Jharkhand, the grand alliance in three Lok Sabha constituencies is in a strong position

Jharkhand Mahagathbandhan leaders share stage together during Babulal Marandi’s nomination (File picture)

Ranchi: After Lok Sabha Election’s second phase of voting in Jharkhand, the trend seems going in favour of Mahagathbandhan as out of 4, 3 seats—Khunti, Ranchi and in Koderma, gathbandhan candidates are on stronger position.

If the reports of voting trend are to be believed, former Chief Minister Arjun Munda set to lose his election, as well as BJP candidates from Ranchi Sanjay Seth and Annapurna Devi from Koderma. Only, Jayant Sinha will be able to retain his Hazaribagh seat.

Political observers believe that there are reports of vote boycotts in some areas of Hazaribagh constituency, and in all these areas, if votes would have been polled, it might have gone against the incumbent member of parliament, Jayant Sinha.

In Khunti, Raghubar Das led BJP government’s forcible suppression of the Pathalgadi movement has angered the tribals and it worked against former chief Arjun Munda. Several organizations that work for the betterment of the marginalised have worked hard to mobilize voters to vote against the BJP candidate in Khunti.

On the other hand, all seem to be going well for the Mahagathbandhan and Congress candidate Subodh Kant Sahay in Ranchi. In Ranchi rural, Congress has managed to get a large chunk of votes.

In Koderma too, things have worked in favour of the Mahagathbandhan candidate – former chief minister Babulal Marandi. He too has been able to grab large votes from the unhappy BJP supporters, who have been vocal protesting against the party’s decision of denying a ticket to Ravindra Rai and fielding an outsider – Annapurna Devi.

“Reports are good and we are going to win with a good margin in Koderma,” claimed an excited Marandi while talking to eNewsroom.
On being asked how would BJP losing the Koderma seat impact the future politics of Jharkhand and centre? Replying to that the former CM said, “Voting in Koderma and Jharkhand has been anti-establishment, against Narendra Modi and Raghubar Das, so it means a lot.”

If Marandi manages to win Koderma seat, it will be really a mandate against PM Narendra Modi and CM Raghubar Das too, as not only the chief minister toured Koderma constituency four times but PM had also hold a rally here.

In the first phase Chatra, Lohardagga and Palamu voted, and here too, gathbandhan is in a strong position in at least two seats.

In the third phase, Giridih, Dhanbad, Jamshedpur and Singhbhum’s Lok Sabha constituencies will be voting on May 12, while May 19 polling will take place in Godda, Rajmahal and Dumka constituencies of Jharkhand.

However, in the evening, Marandi has alleged that the Giridih district administration which conducts the election for Koderma during Lok Sabha election is allegedly favouring BJP. The Jharkhand Vikash Morcha (JVM) chief has even written to the Election Commission of India regarding it. He has alleged that despite the availability of a strong room in Bazar Samiti, Giridih, why a separate cluster had been created in Satgawah, Koderma to store 51 booth’s Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) s?

Courtesy: enewsroom.in

“If misinformation continues to get political patronage, the fake news ecosystem will continue to flourish”

May 8, 2019

The propaganda of misinformation and hoaxes disseminated through print, graphics, and the internet has altered the social landscape of India. It has led to multiple cases of lynching, mob violence, defamation and riots, and continues to pose a serious threat to Indian democracy.

India Misinformed: The True Story identifies the purveyors of fabricated news, exposes the propaganda machinery and familiarises readers with techniques to detect these menacing stories. The book is written by the team of Alt News, a fact-checking website that debunks fake information, and edited by Pratik Sinha, Dr Sumaiya Shaikh and Arjun Sidharth. The following are excerpts from the Foreword written by Ravish Kumar and the Introduction to the book.

यहां फ़ेक न्यूज़ के कारण लोगों की हत्याएं हुई हैं। फ़ेक न्यूज़ के ज़रिये मज़हब के आधार पर दुश्मन तय किया गया। उस दुश्मन से असुरक्षा बढ़ती जाए इसके लिए फ़ेक न्यूज़ फैलाया गया। विचारधारा से प्रभावित होकर किसी राजनीतिक दल के करीब आने वाले समर्थकों को फ़ेक न्यूज़ के ज़रिये उसी रंग की एक दूसरी विचारधारा दी गई, जिससे उनकी राजनीतिक निष्ठा बदलने के जगह और गहरी हो जाती और उनका इस्तमाल हथियार के रूप में बदल दिया जिन तक दिन-रात तरह-तरह के ऐसे न्यूज़ पहुंचाए गए। नतीजा: सड़क पर लोग मारे जाने लगे। एक बार जब भीड़ बन जाती है तो उसे दुश्मन का रंग नज़र नहीं आता है। पहलु ख़ान भी मारा जाता है और सुबोध कुमार सिंह भी। कई बार हत्या के बाद जायज़ ठहराने के लिए फ़ेक न्यूज़ गढ़े गए या न्यूज़ को इस तरह कवर किया गया कि सब कुछ फ़ेक लगने लगे। यहां तक कि दर्शक और पाठक को पहलु ख़ान और सुबोध कुमार सिंह कि हत्या भी फ़ेक लगने लगा।

[…]

In the past two years, certain clear patterns of misinformation have emerged. A prominent portion of this right-wing (RW) propaganda seems to be anchored around misinformation targeting minorities. From fake videos claiming that Muslims celebrated Pakistan’s win over India in Champion’s Trophy to falsely suggesting that the name of the driver of the ill-fated train that ran over several devotees on Dussehra in Amritsar was Imtiaz Ali, a concerted and organized attempt was being made to polarize by projecting minorities in a negative light and blaming them for real and imaginary crimes across the country.

The themes of nationalism also frequently surface in fake news stories in the form of rumours of Pakistan’s flag being sighted or ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ slogans being heard in the rallies of political opponents of nationalist parties.

Distortion of history has also been a prominent theme. From pictures of Jawaharlal Nehru showing affection to his sister and niece shared as evidence of his ‘character’ to allegations that Indian football team had to play barefoot because of him, India’s first prime minister remains one of the favourite targets of fake news.

Misinformation was also weaponized to target individuals such as journalists, activists, liberals and anyone who was critical of the right-wing ecosystem. Misinformation was also enthusiastically used to make misleading claims about the achievements of the union government. We saw fake endorsements of PM Modi by international leaders and a piece of misleading news about a Nobel laureate applauding demonetization.
In the first year, a large majority of misinformation came from the right-wing camp in India, but in the last twelve months, the non-RW political ecosystem has started to increasingly contribute to the spread of misinformation.

Misinformation peaks during certain times. Elections see a surge in false claims and accusations by rival political parties while any form of communal disturbance leads to fake news that seeks to further polarize communities. During the West Bengal riots, a still from a movie was widely circulated as a picture of a Hindu woman being molested by Muslims.

With multiple fact-checking websites working in tandem, prominent accounts on social media which had previously put out multiple instances of misinformation became vigilant. However, anonymous accounts started becoming the seeds of misinformation, especially on Twitter. At that same time, multiple Facebook pages came up and started churning out propaganda in a very professional manner which included quality infographics and videos. Alt News also discovered Facebook groups that were a dedicated marketplace for buying and selling of political Facebook pages. Themes such as the Indian Army, cricket players such as Virendra Sehwag, politicians such as Narendra Modi and Yogi Adityanath were seemingly common for these Facebook political pages. Quite a few of these pages had over a million followers and were apparently sold at hefty prices.

While misinformation was on the rise, instead of becoming allies, mainstream media became a part of the problem. While the misinformation on social media often comes from a position of malice, misreports in mainstream media was as if a function of the business model adopted by several Indian media outlets. Thanks to tight deadlines with pressures of producing unending content for web portals and 24×7 TV channels, fact-checking was done away with.

The most disturbing trend in this rise of fake news is the patronage it receives from political parties. Fake news doesn’t exist in a vacuum. To thrive, it needs support not just from those who fall for it but also from those who benefit the most from it. Several Twitter users who routinely spread misinformation are followed by union ministers and in many cases, even the prime minister of the country seems to be doing so. Many of them proudly display their pictures with the leaders on their profiles. If misinformation continues to get political patronage, the fake news ecosystem will continue to flourish.

Courtesy: Indian Cultural Forum

Elections 2019: After Five Phases, NDA Tally Half of 2014

May 8, 2019

Projections based on last Assembly elections and state-wise swings in votes indicate that the BJP-led NDA government is heading for a defeat, getting just 124 out of 424 seats where polling has finished.

Representational image. | Image Courtesy: Latestly.in

With the completion of polling for 51 seats on May 6, people in 424 parliamentary constituencies have voted in the ongoing Lok Sabha elections. Newsclick’s data analytics team has analysed previous Assembly election results and, after factoring in state-wise swings in votes, it appears that the ruling BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) is headed for a debacle getting only 124 seats compared with 251 in the 2014 elections. The Congress led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) is likely to increase its tally dramatically from just 55 last time to 169 this time.

Besides these two alliances, several other parties or regional alliances which are aligned against the NDA and likely to support the UPA after final results are declared, are also projected to increase their tally. Among them, the strongest showing appears to be that of the Gathbandhan (Alliance) in Uttar Pradesh which will increase its seats from a mere four in 2014 to 37 this time round. Out of the 80 seats in UP, 27 are yet to go to polls and the Gathbandhan’s tally is likely to increase further. The BJP and its allies had won 73 of the 80 seats last time.

2014%20Results.jpg

2019%20Projection.jpg

NDA includes Shiv Sena, JDU, TDP and various smaller parties. UPA includes NCP, RJD, JDS and various smaller parties.
Source: Projections from ECI Assembly/LS results

Other states in which the BJP-led NDA is facing defeat include Tamil Nadu, where its current alliance partner AIADMK is getting resoundingly defeated with rival DMK alliance (part of UPA) getting as many as 28 of the 38 seats that have completed polling, with polling deferred for one seat.

In the last two phases of polling, significant BJP/NDA strongholds went to polls including 13 seats in Madhya Pradesh, seven seats in Jharkhand and all 25 seats of Rajasthan. However, these projections indicate that the BJP is likely to lose significantly in these states too, ceding 12 seats in Rajasthan, six in Jharkhand and four in MP.

The Left parties are likely to increase their tally from 10 to 19 in these five phases. Other parties gaining seats are YSR Congress in (YSRCP) Andhra Pradesh and Trinamool Congress (AITC) in West Bengal, where BJP may also increase its tally.

The projections take into account the discontent against the Modi government on various significant issues like aggravated farmers’ distress, unemployment, lack of increase in wages, industrial slow down, increase in corruption and the communal ideology of the ruling BJP (and RSS) which has laid siege on minorities and dalits/adivasis, fostering violence against these deprived sections. Swings against the Modi government have been tempered to account for discontent against state govts. run by opposition parties wherever necessary.

The continued slide of NDA as the election process inches across the country indicates that on May 23, the results are likely to throw up a severely depleted NDA, with insufficient numbers to form a government.

[Data analysis by Peeyush Sharma and mapping by Glenissa Pereira]

Courtesy: News Click

Shah toys with Code of Conduct, SC demands Details of EC’s Clean Chits

May 7, 2019

Just a day after the ECI cleared PM Narendra Modi and in cases of alleged violation of the Election Model Code of Conduct, in record time to meet the SC deadline to decide on of all such cases, Modi’s close confidante and BJP president Amit Shah is toying with the Code of Conduct.

Addressing a rally in Ghatal in West Bengal, Shah reportedly said, “I want to ask Mamata didi, if Shri Ram’s name is not taken in India, will it be chanted in Pakistan?” This comes dangerously close to violating Code of Conduct provisions against invoking religion to seek votes.
Earlier, the Supreme Court had directed the Election Commission of India to decide on all pending cases of poll code violation against Modi and Shah by May 6. This was in response to a petition filed by Congress MP from Silchar Sushmita Dev, who said that they have given 11 representations to EC against the duo but it has taken decision on only two.

The EC then went on an overdrive and finished the task in record time handing out clean chitslike candy on Halloween! Modi got successive clean chits for his speeches made at rallies in Wardha, Latur and Barmer. He was also given a clean chit in a case of using Wing Commander Abhinandan’s name as a part of an election campaign. This despite the EC’s own clear directive against using the defense forces for asking for votes!
However, reports have emerged that not all decisions on Modi’s poll code violations were unanimous. In at least two instances where PM Modi was given a clean chit, at least one Commissioner dissented. These are the instances of Modi’s speeches made in Wardha and Latur. The decision was made by a panel comprising Chief Election Commissioner Sunil Arora, and Election Commissioners Ashok Lavasa and Sushil Chandra. So if one person dissented, it was majority opinion that decided the case.

However, on Monday May 6, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi who appeared for Congress MP Sushmita Dev in her petition before the Supreme Court submitted that in six of the cases disposed of, there were dissenting notes in five cases! He also submitted that the dissenting notes had not been supplied to them. This prompted the bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi to pass a directive demanding that the EC produce the details of the decisions in each case before the court. The matter has been adjourned to May 8.

Brief background of “Jai Shree Ram” chant matter
This was in reference to the detention of three men for chanting “Jai Shree Ram” and stopping WB CM Mamata Banerjee’s cavalcadeat Ballavpur village when it was en route from Keshpur to Chandrakhona in Medenipur. A video of the incident went viral. The three men were detained, questioned and subsequently released.
Following the incident PM Modi had dared Banerjee to arrest him for saying “Jai Shree Ram”. And now his closest confidante has made a similar statement that comes close to violating the EMCC code about not asking for votes in the name of religion.

EVM’s recovered from Muzaffarpur Hotel on Election Day

May 7, 2019

In a clear breach of the provisions laid down for the storage and handling of EVMs by the Election Commission of India, six machines were recovered from a hotel in Muzaffarpur constituency, that too on the day of polling!

Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO) Kundan Kumar was the one to recover the EVMs. According to District Collector Alok Ranjan Ghosh, a reserve EVM was given to Sector Officer (sector 11) Awdesh Singh who expressed his desire to vote. He was also given two balloting units, one control unit and two VVPATs. According to Ghosh, Singh removed the EVMs near Anand Vivaah Mandap, which is not a government property.

Local RJD leaders have demanded strict action against the errant official and that all six EVMs be rejected. Singh has also been asked to file a reply.

Muzaffarnagar Court orders to attach property of Shahnawaz’s killers in riot case

May 7, 2019

A Sessions court in Muzaffarnagar ordered to attach the property of six accused in the 2013 Muzaffarnagar riot case since they failed to surrender before it despite repeated arrest warrants.

The accused had stabbed to death Shahnawaz, a youth from Kawal village in Muzaffarnagar on August 27, 2013. The stabbing led to widespread riots in Muzaffarnagar and adjoining districts in which more than 60 people were reported dead and approximately 50,000 rendered homeless. The riots were described as one of the worst in Uttar Pradesh in recent history. It was reported then that seven people had entered Shahnawaz’s home, brought him out and had repeatedly stabbed him with swords and knives. Later, two accused, Sachin and Gaurav were reportedly lynched by a mob and had died. Though the incident of stabbing took place because the accused alleged that Shahnawaz had harassed a girl, the girl in question had denied any such accusations. The case had been ongoing since 2014. Riding on the anger in Jat community, the BJP had won the Lok Sabha polls held soon after the incident. Fact findings reports by various independent civil society members had found out that the riots were preceded by provocative and instigating speeches by BJP MLAs.

The Chief Judicial magistrate Rakesh Gautam ordered to attach the property of accused they failed to surrender before it.

The accused have been identified as Ravinder, Prehlad, Bishan Singh, Tendu, Devender and Jitender.

The next hearing is on June 7.

SC “perplexed”: Rafale hearing and Rahul Gandhi’s Contempt Petition listed on Different Dates

May 7, 2019

In a curious twist in the Rafale controversy, hearings in two matters related to the Rafale case that the court had previously directed be held on the same day, were not listed together. The first was the matter or the review petition in the Rafale case, and the second was a contempt petition against Rahul Gandhi.

While the former came up for hearing today, the SC was “perplexed” to learn that the latter had been listed for May 10, despite its clear directive that both matters be listed together. Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reportedly asked, “Why is the contempt matter not listed today? We are hearing both together.”

The matter was adjourned and listed for May 10 to be heard at 2 pm.

Brief background of Rafale Review Petiton:
In the Rafale deal, petitioners Arun Shourie, Yashwant Sinha and Prashant Bhushan filed review petitions against the December 2018 judgment in the case in light of new revelations that show that the government had made inaccurate/false submissions before the court. But the Center objected to the admissibility of new documents saying they had been stolen/illegally obtained and also that this was tantamount to a violation of the Official Secrets Act.

However, the SC rejected the center’s stand and said that the review petitions would be heard on their own merit. On April 30, the central government sought time to file its counter in the case and subsequently filed two affidavits; one rebutting the petitoners’ grounds for a review of the December 2018 judgment, the second a reply to the petitioners’ application demanding the production of specific documents in the case.

Rahul Gandhi Contempt Petition:
Rahul Gandhi had wrongly attributed the comment “Chowkidar Chor Hai” to the Supreme Court while speaking to media persons during his election campaign. This led to a contempt of court notice from the SC to Gandhi. Gandhi promptly expressed regret that his statement was “juxtaposed and intermingled” with the April 10 court decision on the admissibility of leaked documents. Gandhi has also asked for a contempt plea by Meenakshi Lekhi.

1...1,4421,4431,444...2,696 Page 1,443 of 2,696

Celebrity MPs: Lower Attendance, Fewer Debates & Questions

Jharkhand’s second round goes to Mahagathbandhan, the alliance is strong on 3 out of 4 seats

The arithmetic of Mahagathbandhan seems to be working on ground level, as in the second phase of polls in Jharkhand, the grand alliance in three Lok Sabha constituencies is in a strong position

“If misinformation continues to get political patronage, the fake news ecosystem will continue to flourish”

The propaganda of misinformation and hoaxes disseminated through print, graphics, and the internet has altered the social landscape of India. It has led to multiple cases of lynching, mob violence, defamation and riots, and continues to pose a serious threat to Indian democracy.

Elections 2019: After Five Phases, NDA Tally Half of 2014

Projections based on last Assembly elections and state-wise swings in votes indicate that the BJP-led NDA government is heading for a defeat, getting just 124 out of 424 seats where polling has finished.

Shah toys with Code of Conduct, SC demands Details of EC’s Clean Chits

EVM’s recovered from Muzaffarpur Hotel on Election Day

Muzaffarnagar Court orders to attach property of Shahnawaz’s killers in riot case

SC “perplexed”: Rafale hearing and Rahul Gandhi’s Contempt Petition listed on Different Dates

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Important Links

Other Links

CONNECT