MP Elections in Solapur are on 18th April and in Goa on 23rd. Here is what some of the voters feel which they shared with TwoCircles.net:



Courtesy: Two Circle

MP Elections in Solapur are on 18th April and in Goa on 23rd. Here is what some of the voters feel which they shared with TwoCircles.net:



Courtesy: Two Circle

A woman is sometimes denied education just because there are no proper toilets in schools. She’s killed for making choices of her own.
Yet as a woman, the last five years have probably been more nightmarish than all the rest of my years of existence put together. For I see an eight year old Asifa raped and killed. I see her rapists defended by those in power. I have had leaders from the ruling party tell me to bear five children to protect Hinduism. I have had the ruling party’s women leaders tell me not to demand equality in all aspects. I have had someone preach to me about how rape can be “sometimes right and sometimes wrong” – and another one babbling about how rapes only happen in India, not Bharat. Probably because, in Bharat women are not allowed to step out of their homes and are advised to suffer marital violence silently – as a “woman of virtue” would.
From Surat to Muzaffarnagar, I have seen women bear the brunt of sexual violence, which is basically an ugly exercise of power over the defenceless.
It makes me sick to the stomach, to realise that I am living the horror of violence becoming normalised. Over the last five years, many have shed even the pretence of protesting against sexual assault. If a woman is raped, they say she “asked for it by staying out late or being dressed inappropriately”. If she is killed by her own family, they say she committed the mistake of “disrespecting” them.
While every government up until now has failed women one way or another, the ruling dispensation is ideologically predisposed to patriarchy. They deeply believe in the regressive idea of patriarchy and the Indian woman’s need to submit to it. If elected in 2019, they will perhaps cement the idea at all levels.
Under the current government which came to power in 2014, my battles became tougher. In 2019, I might lose them all together.
As I begin to write about why women should exercise their choice better in 2019, two women dominate my thoughts. Both of them would have been first time voters this poll season and both were killed by institutionalised forms of violence. S Anitha, a Dalit girl from Kuzhumur in Tamil Nadu, killed herself on September 1, 2017 after failing to pass NEET, despite having done exceptionally well in other exams. J Snowlin was killed by the police on May 22, 2018 in Thoothukudi along with twelve others – all of them protesting against the expansion of Sterlite Copper in their district.
To those women, this country owes a change.
Courtesy: Indian Cultural Forum
Following Pulwama massacre, NewsClick team travelled to the many villages of Uttar Pradesh, to talk to the school children from the state. The effect of the hysteria propagated in the wake of the terror attack could be clearly gauged from these children’s language. They were talking about guns and bombs, instead of books and pens. Let us watch this ground report.
Courtesy: News Click

Image Courtesy: AFP/Getty Images
Since the brutal murder of Saudi dissident and Washington Post contributor Jamal Khashoggi last October, Congress has increasingly pressured the Trump administration to stop backing the Saudi Arabia-led coalition fighting in Yemen and halt U.S. arms sales to Riyadh. In response, President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that if the U.S. does not sell weapons to the Saudis, they will turn to U.S. adversaries to supply their arsenals.
“I don’t like the concept of stopping an investment of $110 billion into the United States,” Trump told reporters in October, referring to a collection of intent letters signed with the Saudis in the early months of his presidency. “You know what they are going to do? They’re going to take that money and spend it in Russia or China or someplace else.”
But a highly classified document produced by the French Directorate of Military Intelligence shows that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are overwhelmingly dependent on Western-produced weapon systems to wage their devastating war in Yemen. Many of the systems listed are only compatible with munitions, spare parts, and communications systems produced in NATO countries, meaning that the Saudis and UAE would have to replace large portions of their arsenals to continue with Russian or Chinese weapons.
“You can’t just swap out the missiles that are used in U.S. planes for suddenly using Chinese and Russian missiles,” said Rachel Stohl, managing director of the Conventional Defense Program at the Stimson Center in Washington, D.C. “It takes decades to build your air force. It’s not something you do in one fell swoop.”
The catalogue of weapon systems is just one revelation in the classified report, which was obtained by the French investigative news organization Disclose and is being published in full by The Intercept, Disclose, and four other French media organizations. The report also harshly criticizes Saudi military capabilities in Yemen, describing the Saudis as operating “ineffectively” and characterizing their efforts to secure their border with Yemen as “a failure.” And it suggests that U.S.
assistance with Saudi targeting in Yemen may go beyond what has previously been acknowledged.
“If the RSAF benefits from American support, in the form of advice in the field of targeting, the practice of Close Air Support (CAS) is recent and appears poorly understood by these crews,” the document says. A footnote after the word “targeting” specifies that the possible U.S. “advice” refers to “targeting effectuated by American drones.”
Though the U.S. has denied engaging directly in hostilities against the Houthis, American MQ-9 Reaper drones – a reconnaissance drone with hunt-and-kill capabilities – have flown over Houthi occupied territory. After the Houthis shot down one of the drones in October 2017, it led to speculation that the U.S. could be using them to collect intelligence for the Saudis. Targeting being effectuated by American drones could mean that U.S. drones play a more active role in coalition targeting, like laser-sighting precision-guided munitions drops, for example.
U.S. Central Command strongly denied that U.S. drones have any operational role in coalition targeting. “The U.S. military does not provide that type of support to the Saudi-led coalition,” a CENTCOM spokesperson told The Intercept by email. “Our role with the Saudi-led coalition is advisory only. We provide intelligence and advise the coalition on best practices, air-to-ground space awareness, and the law of armed conflict.”

Dated September 25, 2018, the report was written to brief an October meeting of the French “restricted council,” a meeting of cabinet-level officials that included French President Emmanuel Macron, Minister of the Armed Forces Florence Parly, and Minister of European and Foreign Affairs Jean-Yves Le Drian. Its publication is likely to have significant political implications for the Macron government, which has steadfastly defended arms sales to Saudi Arabia, while simultaneously downplaying its own knowledge of how French weapons are used in Yemen.In January, Parly told a host on France Inter, a major French public radio station, that she had “no knowledge as to whether [French] weapons are being used directly in this conflict,” and that “we have recently sold no weapons that could be used in the course of the Yemen conflict.” She has also told journalists that French weapons “have not been used against civilians,” and described the country’s weapons exports as “relatively modest,” adding that “we don’t sell weapons like they’re baguettes.”
But the report shows that the Saudis and Emiratis have made much wider use French military hardware than the French government has admitted. Since the war began in 2015, the coalition has used French tanks and armored vehicles to reinforce the Saudi border and defend Emirati military outposts in Yemen. The Saudis have stationed French long-range artillery guns along its border, capable of firing deep into Yemen’s northern governorates, while the Emiratis have piloted French multiengine fighter planes, equipped with French laser-targeting technology. And both Saudi Arabia and the UAE have used French warships to enforce the coalition blockade against the country.
Though the report lists the French arms used by Saudi Arabia and the and UAE, it consistently notes that French intelligence has not observed the same weapons on “active fronts” with coalition ground forces, which are largely made up of Yemeni fighters loyal to former President Abdu Rabbu Mansour Hadi, as well as foreign mercenaries. One map notes the presence of French Leclerc tanks at a coalition base near the battle of Hodeidah, but the report also says that the UAE uses Leclerc tanks generally for defensive purposes.
In response to a detailed list of questions sent by Disclose, the French prime minister’s office sent a lengthy statement about France’s arms sales and its alliance with Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The statement says that French arms sales are thoroughly reviewed and consistent with French and international law.
“France is a responsible and reliable partner,” the statement reads. “Offensive actions are regularly taken from Yemen against the territory of our regional partners – we have seen this with ballistic missile attacks or drones carrying explosives, for example. France maintains a constant dialogue with these partners to respond to their defense needs.”
It continues: “Moreover, to our knowledge, the French weapons available to the members of the coalition are mostly placed in a defensive position, outside Yemeni territory or on coalition holdings, but not on the front line, and we are not aware of civilian casualties resulting from their use in Yemeni theater.”
At no point does the report assess whether French arms have been used against civilians. One map, however, estimates that more than 430,000 Yemeni people live within range of French artillery guns on the Saudi-Yemen border.
The report is primarily concerned with the location of French weapons among coalition forces and says nothing about origin of Houthi weapons, some of which are known to have come from Iran. An appendix catalogues the major weapon systems used by the Saudis and Emiratis, but is not a complete list; it does not mention munitions, rifles, or several types of armored vehicles spotted by monitoring groups.
Overall, the appendix reinforces a point that observers of the war have made since the intervention began: that the military capability of the coalition has been created and sustained almost entirely by the global arms trade. In addition to the U.S., the U.K., and France, the report mentions radar and detection systems from Sweden; Austrian Camcopter drones; defensive naval rockets from South Korea, Italian warships, and even rocket launcher batteries from Brazil.
YThe report describes the Saudi-led air war in Yemen as “a campaign of massive and continuous airstrikes against territories held by the Houthi rebellion.” The coalition carried out a total of 24,000 airstrikes from the beginning of the war through September 2018, according to the report — a number that falls within the range estimated by the Yemen Data Project, an independent monitoring group.French intelligence has observed five types of piloted fighters flying over Yemen, all of which are NATO aircraft. The only non-NATO aircraft mentioned in the report is the Wing Loong, a Reaper drone knockoff produced by the Chinese. Export controls have prevented the U.S. from selling armed drones to the UAE, so Abu Dhabi turned to China to acquire them. Last year, the UAE used a Chinese drone to kill Saleh al-Samad, president of the Houthi Supreme Political Council, who was widely viewed as an advocate for engaging in the U.N.-led peace process.
Despite their vast technological superiority, the Saudis in particular are failing to meet their military objectives, the report says, identifying Saudi targeting as in need of improvement. And it describes the Saudis as less effective participants in air and sea missions, noting that the Emiratis are largely responsible for the blockade. It speaks more favorably of Emirati pilots, saying that they have a “proven” ability to use guided munitions, and that they perform up to NATO standards during bombing missions.
Before the offensive began, humanitarian groups identified a protracted siege as a worst-case scenario because it could largely stop the flow of aid to some of the regions of the country most in need.
“Commercial and humanitarian shipments coming through Hodeidah port are a lifeline, not just for people in Hodeidah city, but for much of Yemen,” said Scott Paul, a humanitarian policy lead at Oxfam America. “Setting up a long-term front-line and siege on the perimeter of the city would have a dramatic impact on national commodities markets and endanger anyone struggling to pay for basic necessities like food, fuel, and medicine.”
Despite calls from aid groups, the U.S. did not pressure the Emiratis to back off the attack. One U.S. official told the Wall Street Journal that U.S. policy was to display a “blinking yellow light of caution,” and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a statement asking parties to respect the “free flow of humanitarian aid” but stopping short of calling on coalition forces to back off.

Hodeidah saw some of the worst fighting of 2018, and the Norwegian Refugee Council estimated a total of 2,325 civilian casualties as a result. Aid groups also sounded the alarm about thousands of civilians who were trapped because of the fighting. An internationally brokered ceasefire in December slowed the pace of coalition airstrikes, but the ceasefire broke down in January and violence resumed.The French intelligence report also describes a massive operation by the Saudis to secure their border with Yemen, and says that five brigades of the Saudi army and two brigades of the Saudi National Guard — about 25,000 men — are deployed along the border. The troops are reinforced by 300 tanks and a battalion of 48 French-made Caesar self-propelled Howitzer guns capable of firing dozens of miles into Yemeni territory.
The “unspoken goal” of this border operation is to penetrate Houthi-controlled areas and eventually advance on Houthi strongholds in the Yemeni governorate of Saada, the report says. But it says the Saudis’ lack of mobility leaves them highly vulnerable to guerrilla attacks and that their strikes are too imprecise be effective against the nimbler Houthi forces.
“Despite the defensive means deployed, the rebels maintain their nuisance capability: artillery salvos, missile shots, improvised explosive devices, ambushes and infiltrations into Saudi territory,” the report says. “The addition of infantry combat vehicles in empty spaces between the tanks, in the summer of 2016, did not allow for an improvement in the efficiency of Saudi tactics.”
Disclose is the first nonprofit newsroom of investigative journalism in France. Its mission is to reveal abuses and hold the powerful to account. Disclose supports strong and independent journalism that is focused on the public interest.
A whopping 878 complaints of violation of the Election Model Code of Conduct were filed by residents of Pune, Baramati, Maval and Shirur till April 13 since it came into effect on March 10. The complaints were filed using the cVigil app of the Election Commission and have all been disposed of.

Pune District Collector and Returning officer Naval Kishore told the Indian Express, “The cVIGIL app is meant for vigilant citizens. It lays stress on a responsible role to be played by citizens at the time of elections to ensure smooth, free and fair conduct of polls.”
According to Resident Deputy Collector Jayshree Kataria, “There are no serious cases of violations, like distribution of money, serving of liquor or provocative speeches, reported on the cVIGIL app so far. Until now the code violation complaints have been restricted to minor cases, like boards and banners (put up by) political parties that have not been covered.”
Pune led the pack with 314 complaints followed by Bramati with 242, Maval with 205 and Shirur with 117.

It pertains to glaring omissions in his affidavits where a parcel of land worth over a crore suddenly went missing in his declarations post-2012.
Here’s a brief outline of the facts:
– In 2002, then Gujarat CM Narendra Modi was allotted Plot 411, Sector 1, Gandhinagar for a throwaway price of Rs. 1.3 lakhs. The size of the plot was 330 sq. m.
– In 2007, he declared this plot in his affidavit
– Suddenly he dropped any mention of this plot from 2012 onwards. Instead, he claims he now owns 1/4th share of Plot 401/A, Sector 1, Gandhinagar.
– Incidentally, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley ALSO owns a 1/4th share in the SAME plot 401/A
– Curiously, plot 401/A doesn’t exist in the land records. In land records, Plot 411 is still shown as being owned by PM Modi entirely.
– In a very curious circumstance, ground visits show that about 8 adjoining plots and a government ground have been enclosed into a SINGLE compound of plot 411 by building a boundary wall.
My prayer to the Honorable Supreme Court is to order an SIT investigating this murky appearance and disappearance of assets and whether this is an organized land scam.
The cumulative value of these allegedly usurped plots together comes to over 15 crores.
The Honorable Supreme Court in the judgment of Lok Prahari versus Union of India has stated that “hiding monetary assets” can well be considered to be grounds for disqualification of a candidate.
Why did PM Modi hide his ownership of Plot 411 for 7 years? Where are the land records for Plot 401/A and who owns it along with Modi and Jaitley?
Why is there such a glaring discrepancy in the declared assets of PM Modi and the situation on the ground?

Image Courtesy: Photo Credit: K.V.S. GIRI / The Hindu
Looks like a show-cause notice was no deterrent for the union minister Maneka Gandhi.
In another shocker, barely a few days since the Women and Child Development (WCD) minister made the controversial no-jobs-for-Muslims comment, Gandhi has said that villages will be classified into different sections for developmental work based on how many votes the BJP receives.
Gandhi was canvassing for votes in Sultanpur where she told prospective voters that there would be an ‘ABCD” system based on which she will prioritise development for only those villages who register maximum votes for the BJP as a reward.
Here, she elaborated that ‘category A’ will be reserved for villages that case 80 percent votes for the BJP, ‘category B’ for 60 percent favourable votes and ‘category C’ and ‘category D’ will be fixed for villages that cast less than 50 percent votes.
In what appears like a clear threat, Gandhi said, “Every time we win from Pilibhit, so what is framework for village-wise development? We segregate all villages as A, B, C, D. The framework is, when the work will begin, 80 per cent of the work will be done for category A villages, then 60 per cent for the rest of the people. So, it is up to you whether you make it to A, B, C or D. No one should fall in D category as we all come here to do good.”
She added that the BJP has also implemented the same ‘category’ system at Pilibhit, from where her son Varun Gandhi is the BJP candidate.
Merely a week back, she had issued a ‘ferman’ to Muslims saying that she will not be able to do anything for those Muslim voters who don’t vote for her. Moreover, she said that whether or not Muslims vote for her, she will certainly win.
She had said, “My feelings get hurt. If Muslims then come to me asking for work, then I will think let it be, how does it matter? After all, a job is a deal,” making it clear that Muslims should not expect jobs if they don’t vote for her.
The Election Commission (EC) had issued a show-cause notice to her on this statement.
In what appears to be a swap, Maneka Gandhi is contesting from her son Varun Gandhi’s Sultanpur constituency while he is the BJP candidate in Pilibhit.
Pilibhit will be going to polls in the third phase of Lok Sabha elections on April 23. The results of the seven-phase national election will be announced on May 23.
BJP’s Mohan Kundariya, who is contesting the Lok Sabha polls from the Rajkot seat in Gujarat, found himself in hot water after an audio clip of him allegedly issuing a threat to get votes went viral. Per DNA, in a phone call with Rajkot district Panchayat member Nanubhai Dodiya of the Congress, allegedly said, “I need 70-75 per cent voting from Kotharia in my favour. If not, the mandli could be shut down,” and claimed Dodiya had criticised him. DNA reported that Dodiya responded by telling Kundariya not to threaten him, and said, “I will resign if you say. I am a member of district panchayat of Congress.. talk with me respectfully”.
![]()
Image Courtesy: Ahmedabadmirror
The Ahmedabad Mirror reported that Kundariya told Dodiya to ensure that 70% of votes in Kotharia, on the outskirts of Rajkot, should go to the BJP, and said that if this did not happen, he would make sure that the Kotharia Cooperative Society is dissolved. Dodiya is the organisation’s president, and has headed it for 30 years. Per the Ahmedabad Mirror, Kundariya denied the allegations and accused the Congress of mischief. Dodiya said that Kundariya called him at 9:30pm on Saturday, April 13. The Mirror noted that on Thursday, April 11, the Congress alleged that Kundariya had breached the Election Model Code of Conduct by arranging a press conference at the Rajkot mayor’s bungalow; the code mandates that government property cannot be used for a political event. At the press conference, Kundariya alleged that the Congress was inciting farmers’ protests over the nonpayment of crop insurance, the Ahmedabad Mirror said.
DNA noted that Kundariya joins other BJP leaders who have issued threats over votes, saying that BJP MLA Madhu Shrivastav is being investigated by the police for speech in which he allegedly threatened people with “dire consequences” if they did not vote for the BJP. Moreover, Gujarat minister Kunvarji Bavaliya was captured on camera on Saturday, April 13, asking a group of villagers why they had not voted for him. Campaigning in the Kanesara village, Bavaliya was confronted by a group of residents, largely women, who told him that drinking water was available to only half of the village, NDTV reported. Bavaliya said, “I have the entire water resources ministry, I am in the government, and if required, I can sanction crores of rupees to arrange water supply to the village,” adding, “When I contested the election this time, I got only 55 per cent votes. Why didn’t you all come together to vote for me?”
Join our mailing list to get the latest human rights news that matters, straight to your mailbox.
Join our mailing list to get the latest human rights news that matters, straight to your mailbox.
© Sabrang | All Rights Reserved
