Time to Militarise Hindus, Hinduise the Nation!

24. https://newsclick.in/dissecting-communal-riots-bihar-two-lakh-swords-and-plenty-hateful-songs

24. https://newsclick.in/dissecting-communal-riots-bihar-two-lakh-swords-and-plenty-hateful-songs

EPA/Turkish President Press Office
To everybody’s amazement, during a campaign lasting only 50 days, Ince transformed himself from an also-ran into a serious contender. He managed to pull support from all sections of society to his large rallies with an election slogan of “we will make peace, we will grow and we will share”.
While his supporters never thought a second round presidential vote would be anything but a foregone conclusion, they hoped Ince could capture enough of the vote to force one to happen – or even win the first round. But they were sorely disappointed. Instead, the sitting president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, pulled off a surprise of his own: he captured nearly 53% of the presidential vote, heading off a second round, while Ince garnered only 31%. While he accepted his defeat, he looks set to remain a significant opponent to Erdoğan, especially if he becomes the leader of his party, the CHP.
There were many other surprises besides. The HDP, the main pro-Kurdish party, managed to enter parliament even though its leader spent the campaign in prison. The nationalist MHP, the AKP’s election ally, managed to get more than 11% even though its leader didn’t organise a single rally. This will deprive the AKP of its outright parliamentary majority, meaning it will be more dependent than ever on the MHP.
At the same time, these results usher in a dramatic realignment of the political system. Turkey’s president will now hold extensive executive powers, and parliament will be much less significant. There will be no prime ministry, and all ministers will be appointed from outside the parliament by the president.
For those who have been worrying about Erdoğan’s increasingly autocratic rule until now, it seems their nightmare is about to enter a new phase. But Erdoğan isn’t out of the woods either.
The country is facing one of its most serious economic crises of recent times, with the Turkish Lira worryingly weak and interest rates climbing. Turkey is hosting at least 3.5m Syrian refugees with no prospect of a peace settlement in the hellish conflict across the border. Erdoğan has only a few friends in the international arena besides Russia’s Vladimir Putin. The prospect of EU membership has evaporated, and the US is now far from a dependable ally.
The Kurdish crisis, too, is still waiting for a political settlement, but the AKP’s increased dependency on the staunchly nationalist MHP will make a political resolution on that front even harder.

AKP supporters celebrate in Ankara. EPA/Erdem Sahin
More importantly, these elections leave Turkish society all the more polarised and divided. For the 50% that voted for parties other than the AKP in the parliamentary polls, Turkey is a country of fear, mistrust and uncertainty. Erdoğan will need to work hard to win their hearts and minds, though in recent years he has seemed mainly interested in catering to his own 50% of the population.
With the promises made by opposition candidates during the election campaign, Erdoğan has also promised a prosperous new Turkey, a high-quality democracy where the rule of law would be the norm. He promised to lift the state of emergency shortly after the elections, to build his controversial Istanbul Canal, to open public parks throughout the country, and give every neighbourhood its own state-run cafe where tea and cake would be free.
Given the state of the economy, these promises sound like a tall order. But having run the country for 16 years, one thing Erdoğan has on his side is experience. Indeed, that’s why many of his supporters voted for him. But promises are all very well; the question now is whether Erdoğan will make good on them – and what will happen if he doesn’t.
Alpaslan Ozerdem, Professor of Peace-Building, Co-Director of Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry University
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
More than a dozen incidents of attack on Christians by the Right wing Hindu groups have been reported recently from different parts of the State. Interestingly, in all these incidents police is working as henchmen to the Hindutva groups.
A local Pastor from the Sardhana area of Meerut, Dipendra Prakash Malewar was brutally attacked and beaten by workers of Bajrang Dal and VHP— affiliates of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh— in the premise of a local court in Sardhana. The pastor, who was accompanied by his advocate, was thrashed by the Hindutva workers and handed over to the police. They snatched affidavits of seventeen Hindu families who wanted to convert to Christianity. Instead of taking action against the attackers, the local police arrested the pastor for “illegal and forcible conversion”.
The VHP and Bajrang Dal workers accused the Pastor of “forcibly converting” the local Hindus and threatened him against living in the area. Later the investigation conducted by local Non-Governmental organisations showed that the families wanted to convert of their own will and Pastor Malewar only wanted to make legal affidavits to avoid allegations of “forcible conversion”.
Many families for whom the Pastor was making the affidavits in the Sardhana court on Friday later told NewsClick that no one pressurised them to convert.
Sanjeev, whose name, aadhar card, and signature were found on the affidavit, said that he has started practising Christianity.
“We did not have a single child for the past 12 years. One of my relatives suggested that I might be blessed with a baby if I associate myself with Lord Jesus. For the last six years I have been going to the local Church in Sardhana and I have been blessed with three children”, said Sanjeev, a resident of Mansoorpur in the Sardhana sub-division of Meerut.
“All of my children have Christian names. I visit the Sardhana Church every Sunday. I want to make it very clear that there was no pressure or allurement of any kind from any Christian missionary or Pastor on me or my family to convert. Me and my family converted to Christianity out of our own will,” he added.
Similarly, other families on whose behalf the Pastor Malewar was preparing the affidavit told NewsClick that they regularly go to the local epiphany Church. The priest of the local epiphany Church, Nirmal Jacob told the media that there was no pressure on anyone to convert to Christianity.
“A large number of people visit the Church on Sundays. All of them are associated with the Church without any pressure or allurement,” Jacob said.
The seventeen Hindu families who wanted to convert to Christianity are residents of Sardhana and Khatauli, the two Assembly constituencies represented by BJP leaders Sangeet Som and Vikram Saini. Both of the MLAs, who are also accused in the 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots and who were detained under the stringent National Securities Act by the previous State government, are known for their anti-minorities views and have been in controversy for their hate speeches.
Mr. Saini told NewsClick that he will ensure that the police investigates “illegal and unlawful forcible conversion of the local Hindus by Christian missionaries.”
“Forcible conversion of Hindus is an extremely serious issue. Some Christian missionaries were trying to convert local Hindus by offering them money and other forms of allurement. But thankfully they could not be successful in their illegal and unholy attempts. I have asked the local police administration to be vigilant and arrest all those who are into such illegal activity.” he said.
Interestingly, the Christian organisations told NewsClick that every citizen of India has the Constitutional right to choose and practice the faith h/she wanted.
Pramod Singh from Christian Legal Association (CLA), a nationwide group which intervenes in cases of violation of religious rights of Christians, told NewsClick that the Hindu Right in India always opposed the rights of the people to choose their faith as per their wish. “Incidents of attacks on Christians and arresting them on the basis of allegations of forcible conversion has increased”, he said.
“The last time I checked, India was still a Constitutional democracy which granted every citizen the right to choose the faith they want to practice. The Hindutva ideology never liked this freedom because it enabled the local Hindus to convert if they wanted to. They do not have a problem if some Christian or Muslim wanted to convert to Hinduism, but they start their hue and cry if a Hindu wants to convert to another faith. Hence they always use the phrase ‘illegal or forcible conversion’ of Hindus. They never acknowledge this as the Constitutional right of a Hindu to choose a faith of their choice,” Singh said.
“In this case, the local Pastor of Sardhana was getting the affidavits made with the signature of the people who wanted to convert, only as a precaution. So that everything is legal. Otherwise even the affidavits were not needed for anyone to convert in UP,” he added. He said that CLA was preparing a memorandum to be sent to the local officials of Sardhana and Meerut protesting against the attack on the Christian minorities in the State.
“Often in States like UP, when we approach the authorities asking why they arrested the Christians instead of arresting the Hindutva goons who attacked them, they tell us that the mob was aggressive and Christians were arrested to ensure their protection and safety from the mob. By giving this twisted logic, the officials in a way admit that it was a mob rule and the rule of law has no control,” he added.
Such incidents are prominent especially ahead of Christmas. Singh reminded that last year in December, a group of Christians were arrested by the police after they were found to be praying inside their house in a Mathura village. They were accused of “forcible conversion” of people in the Irauli Gurjar village of Mathura. All of them were later granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge of Mathura, Amar Pal Singh, who scolded the police for lack of evidence in the case and said that India was a secular country which granted people the right to follow any faith as per their will.
“The prosecution story does not mention who was converted and what was offered in lieu of conversion…No material evidence like money or anything which could be used to lure people for conversion, was recovered by the police. There is no independent witness,” Amar Pal Singh observed while granting bail to the seven individuals.
“I have studied the case diary…There is no evidence that proves that the accused were forcibly trying to convert people. India is a secular country. People are free to follow any faith as per their will. There is no evidence in the case diary to show that the unity and integrity of the country was being affected,” observed the judge.
Similarly, two weeks ago, seven people were arrested from the Nawabganj area in Bahraich after some local residents alleged that a man was forced to convert to Islam. However, Brijmohan of Shivnagra village, the person who wanted to convert, said he embraced Islam on his own volition to marry a Muslim woman. The arrested people were still in jail.
Interestingly, it goes without mentioning that while followers of Islam and Christianity are being attacked, arrested, and prosecuted for following their faith and talking about it in public, Hindutva groups’ attempt to convert Christians and Muslims have gotten a renewed push and encouragement under the Yogi Adityanath government.
A month after Yogi took oath as the CM, three incidents of “ghar wapsi” were reported from eastern UP. Nineteen Muslims, who were residents of Ambedkar Nagar were converted in April last year, while another 24 were converted on May 20 in Faizabad. Local Hindutva activists told NewsClick that in the atmosphere of uncertainty among the minorities, RSS affiliates like VHP and Dharam Jagaran Manch have found a renewed vigour under the Yogi Adityanath administration to push for their program of conversion of Muslims and Christians- “Ghar Vapsi”.
Courtesy: Newsclick.in

Image Courtesy: AP
An internal Emergency was imposed on the country by the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25-26, 1975, and it lasted for 19 months. This period is considered as ”dark times’ for Indian democratic polity. Indira Gandhi claimed that due to Jaiprakash Narayan’s call to the armed forces to disobey the ‘illegal’ orders of Congress rulers, it had created a situation of anarchy and there was a danger to the existence of Indian Republic, so there was no alternative but to impose Emergency under article 352 of the Constitution.
RSS claims that it opposed Emergency promulgated by Indira Gandhi heroically and suffered immensely for resisting Emergency 43 years ago. But there are dozens of contemporary narratives which decry this claim. We will be referring here to such two narratives by a veteran thinker and journalist of India, Prabhash Joshi and TV Rajeswar, former Intelligence Bureau [IB] chief who was the deputy chief of IB when Emergency was imposed. They recounted the days of Emergency (or state terrorism) when RSS surrendered to the repressive regime of Indira Gandhi, assured her and her son, Sanjay Gandhi, to enforce faithfully, the draconian 20-point programme announced by the Emergency regime. A large number of RSS cadres came out of jails by submitting Maafinamas (mercy petitions.)
Despite this betrayal, thousands of RSS cadres continue to get a monthly pension for persecution during Emergency. The BJP ruled states like Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Maharashtra decided to award a monthly pension of Rs. 10,000 to those who were jailed during the Emergency period for more than a month and Rs. 5000 to those who were jailed for less than a month. This rule took care of the financial interest of those RSS cadres who might have submitted mercy letters completing only one or two months’ jail term. For securing such a fat pension there was no such condition that the beneficiary should have been in jail for the whole period of the Emergency.
Interestingly, in the case of anti-British freedom struggle, there has not been even a single RSS cadre to claim the freedom fighter pension. It may be noted that nobody remembers hundreds of Communist youth, branded as Naxals, who were killed in fake encounters during the Emergency. Interestingly, Shiv Sena, the Hindutva co-traveller of the RSS openly supported the Emergency.
The narrative by Prabhash Joshi appeared in the English weekly Tehelka on the 25th anniversary of the Emergency. According to him, even during the Emergency, “there was always a lurking sense of suspicion, a distance, a discreet lack of trust” about RSS joining the anti-Emergency struggle. He went on to tell that “Balasaheb Deoras, then RSS chief, wrote a letter to Indira Gandhi pledging to help implement the notorious 20-point programme of Sanjay Gandhi. This is the real character of the RSS. You can decipher a line of action, a pattern. Even during the Emergency, many among the RSS and Jana Sangh who came out of the jails gave mafinaamas (apologies.) They were the first to apologise. Only their leaders remained in jail: Atal Behari Vajpayee, LK Advani, even Arun Jaitley. But the RSS did not fight the Emergency. So why is the BJP trying to appropriate that memory?”
Prabhash Joshi’s conclusion was that “They are not a fighting force and they are never keen to fight. They are basically a compromising lot. They are never genuinely against the government.”
TV Rajeswar, who served as Governor of Uttar Pradesh and Sikkim after his retirement from service, in his book, ‘India: The Crucial Years” [Harper Collins] corroborated the fact that “Not only they (RSS) were supportive of this [Emergency], they wanted to establish contact apart from Mrs. Gandhi, with Sanjay Gandhi also.” Rajeswar in an interview with Karan Thapar disclosed that Deoras “quietly established a link with the PM’s house and expressed strong support for several steps taken to enforce order and discipline in the country. Deoras was keen to meet Mrs. Gandhi and Sanjay. But Mrs. Gandhi refused.”[i]
According to Rajeswar’s book, “RSS, a right-wing Hindu nationalist organisation, was banned in the wake of the Emergency. But its chief, Balasaheb Deoras, quietly established a link with the PM’s house and expressed strong support to several steps taken to enforce order and discipline in the country. Sanjay Gandhi’s concerted drive to enforce family planning, particularly among Muslims, had earned Deoras’s approbation.”
Rajeswar also shared the fact that even after Emergency the “organization (RSS) had specifically conveyed its support to the Congress in the post-emergency elections.” It will be interesting to note that even according to Subramanian Swamy, in the Emergency period, most of the senior leaders of RSS had betrayed the struggle against Emergency.
The contemporary documents in the RSS archives prove the narratives of Prabhash Joshi and Rajeswar. The third supremo of RSS, Madhukar Dattatraya Deoras wrote the first letter to Indira Gandhi within two months of the imposition of Emergency. It was the time when state terror was running amok.
In a letter dated August 22, 1975, he began with this praise of Indira:
“I heard your address to the nation which you delivered on August 15, 1975, from Red Fort on the radio in jail [Yervada jail] with attention. Your address was timely and balanced so I decided to write to you.”[ii]
Indira Gandhi did not respond to it. So Deoras wrote another letter to Indira on November 10, 1975. He began his letter with congratulating her on being cleared by the Supreme Court of disqualification which was ordered by the Allahabad High Court, “All the five Justices of the Supreme Court have declared your election constitutional, heartiest greetings for it.” It is to be noted that opposition was of the opinion that this judgment was ‘managed’ by Congress. In the course of the letter, he declared that “RSS has been named in the context of Jaiprakash Narayan’s movement. The government has also connected RSS with Gujarat movement and Bihar movement without any reason. The Sangh has no relation to these movements.”[iii]
Since Indira Gandhi did not respond to this letter also, RSS chief got hold of Vinoba Bhave who supported the Emergency religiously and was a favourite of Indira Gandhi. In a letter dated January 12, 1976, he begged that Acharya should suggest the removal of the ban on RSS.[iv]
Since Acharya too did not respond to Deoras letter, he wrote another letter, without a date, in desperation:
“According to press reports respected PM [Indira Gandhi] is going to meet you at Pavnar Ashram on January 24. At that time there will be a discussion about the present condition of the country. I beg you to try to remove the wrong assumptions of PM about RSS so that ban on RSS is lifted and RSS members are released from jails. We are looking forward to the times when RSS and its members are able to contribute to the plans of progress which are being run in all the fields under the leadership of PM.”[v]
Riding the juggernaut of the rulers, especially the autocratic ones, has been an old practice of RSS. It was this reason that no leader and cadre of RSS participated in the anti-colonial freedom struggle. In fact, the RSS worships brute force and totalitarianism. The most prominent ideologue of the RSS, the second boss of the organization, Golwalkar decreed as back as in 1940 that, “The RSS inspired by one flag, one leader and one ideology is lighting the flame of Hindutva in each and every corner of this great land.”[vi]
Recently, the former President of the Indian Republic, Pranab Mukherjee was invited by the RSS chief, Mohan Bhagwat to be the chief guest at its graduation ceremony for the new recruits. Pranab Mukherjee was indicted as one of the top leaders of Congress for Emergency excesses. The tragedy of RSS is that India continues to be run under a democratic polity so its love for brazen power has to be balanced by double-game.

Mohammad Arif | Photo Credit: De21 Arif
Nuh, Haryana: What is being seen as a crackdown on human rights defenders, the police in Nuh, Haryana, raided human rights activist Mohammad Arif’s house in his absence on June 19.
Journalists and activists have written to Haryana CM ML Khattar seeking protection and safety for him and his family. “Abid Hussain, ASI, Mewat police, along with three other unidentified police officials barged into the house of Mohd. Arif Tain without a warrant or substantiated suspicion. They came at a time when only his mother, wife and children were at home. When the family asked the police to show a warrant, the same was denied to the family and they threatened the family. The police after entering the house without any warrant or court order, vandalized his property and made baseless accusations and unsubstantiated claims against Mohd. Arif, saying he was in possession of illegal arms, which have not been recovered,” the letter stated.
The human rights activist has been fighting against lynchings and encounter killings in Mewat and is the first responder in most of these incidents. He is also the Haryana state co-ordinator of Aman Biradari, an organisation that works for human rights.
“Mr. Arif, claimed that he was away to Punahana to conduct fact-finding into encounter cases in the area, when the police reached his house in Tain village. Four policemen, led by Assistant Sub-Inspector Abid Hussain arrived around 8 p.m. in a PCR van and carried out a search operation,” He said in a report by The Hindu.
Mohd. Arif’s response
“Mr. Hussain directed the team to search for alleged illegal weapons hidden in the house, said Mr. Arif, who claimed that he got the information about the raid from a fellow villager and ex-Block Samiti member Subedar Khan. Mr. Arif said that the raid continued for around 15 minutes. “My wife, mother and daughter were at home at that time. When he [Mr. Khan] informed me about the raid over phone, I asked him to rush to the house and film it. However, it was all over by the time he reached,” he said in the report.
Mr. Arif has featured in the Limca Book of Records for setting up India’s first community radio-based consumer helpline. He held a protest against this raid on June 20 at Gandhi Park in Nuh along with friends and well-wishers, the report stated. He sought to know as to how a raid was conducted without a warrant and demanded action against the four policemen. He said that he had been honoured by the district administration on several occasions for social work.
“Mr. Arif said that it could be an attempt to mount pressure on him since he has been conducting fact-finding into alleged cases of encounters in Mewat, spread across Nuh, Mathura, Alwar and Bharatpur. He said there could be a larger conspiracy to arrest and eliminate him. “I have been conducting fact-finding into encounters into this region over the past decade. More than 50 people, all Muslims, have been killed in several encounters since 2007. In a few cases, the police did not even hand over the body to the families of the deceased,” said Mohd. Arif in the report.
SP (Nuh) Nazneen Bhasin said she was not aware of the matter and assured to look into it.
“Mohd. Arif is a frontline Human Rights defender and activist working with Aman Biradari where is providing socio-legal support to the families of lynching victims as well as those who lost their lives in police encounters. He has an impeccable human rights record working for the Mewat community on various issues including education of girl children, rural digital empowerment, entitlements and more recently raising the issue of lynching and alleged false encounters by police before various forums including Human Rights Commissions, police officials and the courts. It is feared that through these illegal means, attempts are being made to silence Mohd. Arif’s voice against lynchings and illegal encounters and also implicate him in false legal cases which could lead to criminal charges being filed against him, his incarceration and assault on his reputation,” the letter to CM Khattar stated.
The declaration of Governor’s rule in Jammu and Kashmir has plunged the valley into political turmoil. Apprehensions are running high. CJP Secretary Teesta Setalvad spoke to Kashmiri Pandit Sangharsh Samiti (KPSS) leader Shri Sanjay Tickoo to find out more about the situation.
First Published on https://cjp.org.in

Canada: The autobiography of a philanthropist who lost his wife and two children in the Air India bombing was released in Delta, British Columbia, on Sunday afternoon.
Ray of Hope is the memoir of Dr. Chandra Sankurathri whose wife Manjari, son Srikiran and daughter Sarada were aboard the ill-fated Air India Flight 182 that was bombed mid-air in June 1985, killing all 329 people aboard. This was the worst attack in the history of aviation terrorism before 9/11. Widely blamed on the Sikh separatists seeking revenge for the repression of Sikhs in 1984, the attack had turned the life of Sankurathri upside down. Yet, turning his grief into strength, Sankurathri established a foundation in memory of his wife in her native city of Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh in India.
The Manjarai Sankurathri Memorial Foundation currently runs a free school and an eye hospital for poor and needy. Whereas, the school is named after his daughter whose dream of going to school was shattered as she was only four. He named the hospital after his son.
The memoir was released at George Mackie Library in his absence by other Air India victims’ families and friends and two prominent journalists Charlie Smith and Robert Matas. However, his message was read out at the beginning of the event that was organized by Indians Abroad for Pluralist India (IAPI) in commemoration of the Air India bombing anniversary that falls on June 23. A day before the book launch, the victims’ families had gathered at the Air India memorial in Stanley Park in Vancouver, Canada, to remember their loved ones.
Among those who unveiled the book were Major Singh Sidhu – who lost his sister, a nephew and a niece and Mandeep Grewal who lost his father. Bhama, a close friend of Dr. Sankurathri joined the unveiling ceremony on his behalf.
A short documentary on Dr. Sankurathri’s work was shown at the event that was opened with a Punjabi poem dedicated to the Air India victims by Amrit Diwana. Both Smith and Matas spoke at length about the Air India tragedy and encouraged people to read Ray of Hope that inspires everyone to fight hatred with love. Describing the Air India disaster as an attack on the Indian diversity, the IAPI cofounder Gurpreet Singh threw light on the ugly political events of 1984 that led to the bombing and cautioned the gathering about growing attacks on religious minorities in India from Hindu Right and its impending consequences. He pointed out that the Air India bombing was the culmination of similar violence against Sikhs.
Among those in attendance were former British Columbia Premier Ujjal Dosanjh, World Sikh Organization founder Gian Singh Sandhu and University of British Columbia researcher and an activist Sukhvinder Kaur Vinning. Others present included the IAPI cofounder Parshotam Dosanjh and visiting Punjabi leftist activist from India Sardara Mahil.
Join our mailing list to get the latest human rights news that matters, straight to your mailbox.
Join our mailing list to get the latest human rights news that matters, straight to your mailbox.
© Sabrang | All Rights Reserved
