Home Blog Page 1989

Make Report on HR Violations in the Hadiya Case, Public: AIPWA to the Kerala State Women’s Commission

0

Hadiya Case Resonates with Women even as Communal Polarisation Grows, Govt Silent: Kerala. There has been silence from the State Women’s Commission and the State Human Rights Commission in CPI(M)-ruled Kerala. Communal forces of the extreme Hindu kind have used the tragic, extra legal confinement of a woman, and reportedly violent incarceration to fuel hate sentiments against Muslims and Islam.  Hadiya, 23, allegedly illegally confined to her home simply because she exercised her right as an autonomous woman.

Hadiya Case
 
Sabrangindia has been highlighting this issue for weeks. On September 22, public intellectuals tried to raise this issue to ensure accountability from the CPI-M led Kerala government. Now AIPWA has demanded that the KSWC make its report on the issue public.
 
[This is the text of the open letter to M C Josephine, Chairperson, KSWC, from Kavita Krishnan, Secretary, All-India Progressive Women’s Association]
 
To
Ms M. C. Josephine
Chairperson
Kerala Women’s Commission
Dear Ms Josephine,

This is with reference to the case of Ms. Hadiya, which has caused deep concern among women’s groups, as well as concerned citizens.

We believe that you will approach the Honourable Supreme Court with a report you have prepared on the human rights violations possibly faced by Ms Hadiya. We applaud your efforts in seeking permission to meet her, and in preparing the report. However, we believe that given the fact that the young woman is under house arrest in her own family home, that the country is watching how a person’s fundamental rights have been violated on the instance of the Honourable High Court, the Women’s Commission could play a more decisive role in making the report public as well.

Also, even as we hold your office in the highest regard, we would like to express some concern regarding the views expressed by you on the matter of conversion. You have stated that you would prefer to refer to her as Hadiya Akhila, and that it was important that young women not undergo religious conversion for marriage. In light of the recent judgement by the nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court, which has affirmed that privacy is a fundamental right, we reiterate that faith, as well as the choice of one’s name as well as partner are indeed private matters protected by the Constitution. In Hadiya’s case, she converted well before her marriage, and chose the name Hadiya. We feel that the message needs to be carried to the public that choice in matters related to faith and matrimony are private matters.

While it may be that changing names, embracing the religion of the husband, living with the husband’s family may indeed be patriarchal practices, but that we need to acknowledge that many women indeed choose to follow them and that their decisions should be respected. Thousands of women move to their marital homes and change their names each year. You will agree that we do recognise them by their new names and addresses. I am sure you recognize that many women who use the surnames of their husbands after marriage, are also respected as leaders of progressive movements and women’s movements, and are not judged for the same.

We urge you to make the report on the human rights violations of Hadiya public, so that such human rights violations will not remain a private matter.

Respectfully,
Kavita Krishnan,
Secretary, All India Progressive Women’s Association, (AIPWA)
 

There’s More, Nathuram Godse Fans Are Also Followed by PM Modi on Twitter

0

Godse was God sent”, “Gandhi should have been hanged“, “Godse had valid reasons to shoot Gandhi”, “I repeat I’m a big Godse fan, so what?
 

Godse

What do the people who posted these tweets have in common? Yes, they are all followed by the honorable Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi. “गांधी जयंती पर बापू को शत्-शत् नमन! I bow to beloved Bapu on Gandhi Jayanti. His noble ideals motivate millions across the world,” Even as PM Modi tweeted his homage to Mahatma Gandhi on the occasion of Gandhi Jayanti, he continues to follow many of those who celebrate the killer of Gandhi.

 

The video that is attached to Mr. Modi’s tweet pays a personal tribute to Mahatma Gandhi on his Birth Anniversary. Though from Prime Minister downwards, BJP leaders don’t miss to their mandatory Gandhi Jayanti tweet, the situation on the ground among the followers of the RSS ideology is very different. From criticizing Gandhi to praising Godse, you can see it all there.

Alt News researched the tweets of the people Mr. Modi follows to see the sentiment they express towards the father of the nation and his murderer. Here is a small selection:

There are those deify him and are ardent admirers

Tweet1

Yet others find rational reasons to justify the killing of the Mahatma

The following tweet is by BJP’s National IT Cell head.
These are the thoughts of BJP National IT Cell head vis-a-vis Gandhiji's assassination

These are the thoughts of BJP National IT Cell head vis-a-vis Gandhiji’s assassination

Yet, the common feature in many being that they see nothing wrong with the killer


 

And others who equate Godse to Ram, Krishna and Obama while equating Gandhiji to Osama, Kans and Ravan

And others who wish Godse were still around for more such jobs

And those who salute Godse and support the idea of statues in his memory

 

The above is only a small extract from a large number of such tweets by people Mr Modi handpicked to follow. Though he follows so many admirers of Nathuram Godse, Mr. Modi himself has never tweeted anything in his praise. At the same time, he has never said anything negative about him either. His views on Godse remain unsaid, never to be expressed openly.

Courtesy: Altnews
 

Another Example of the Undemocratic Functioning of VC Girish Tripathi, Minutes of BHU-IIT ‘Doctored’

0

The continuation of Girish Tripathi as Vice Chancellor, BHU and in the post if Chairmanship of the Board of Governors(BOG) of BHU-IIT is not only against the interests, autonomy and integrity of the renowned university, his functioning has bypassed statutory norms, sources have told Sabrangindia.. Appropriate steps should be therefore immediately taken by the MHRD University, has been the demand. Documents in the possession of Sabrangindia reveal how he has not only not taken decisions and discussions at the Board of Governors seriously but has also been accsued of ‘doctoring’ minutes.

Meanwhile, the  Indian Express has just reported that VC Girish Tripathi has ‘gone on leave.’
 

For a year and two months the BOG of BHU-IIT have not met. 

 
The last and fourth meeting of the BOGs of BHU took place on July 8, 2017. The VC is chairman of the BOG. The meeting took place at his residence. Important decisions were taken at the meeting. Shockingly, to date, a year and more after the meeting took place not only have the minutes of the last  meeting that reflect discussions and decisions that took place not been circulated, but no further meeting has been held. Important decisions taken at the BOG meeting have not been implemented.
 
Copy of the Document that Reflects the Draft minutes has been accessed by Sabrangindia.
 
On July 23, 2016 draft minutes and decisions were compiled and sent to the VC. A reminder dated August 2, 2016 regarding the delay in finalisation of minutes was sent. Revised minutes were circulated by tHe VC dated September 5, 2016 to which a reply was sent dated September 12, 2016 pointing out errors and omissions. Crucial decisions taken at the BOG were simply missing from the minutes circulated by the VC.
 
 
In this connection, Prof Dhananjay Pandey on September 13, JS Rajput on September 14, RaJeev Sangal on September 16, Onkar Singh on September 17, Narendra Ahuja on September 20 and Prof Ganesh Nagariya on September 23 wrote separate emails urging another meeting of the BOG to reflect and discuss on the doctored minutes. The communications also urged a Video Recording of the proceedings of the BOG to enable objective documentation of the proceedings. ReMinfers were sent on October 8, 2016. Oral reminders on the matter of incomplete minutes were given again and on  October 23 and again on November 4, 2017. 
 
After July 8, 2016 there has been only one special sitting if the BHU-IIT BOG when rules demand atleast two meryongs of the BOG every academic year.
 
The conduct of tHe VC, Girish Tripathi in completely bypassing norms and procedures of the BHU-IIT is now reflected in his undemocratic actions vis a vis the student community, especially the young women students, in general. 

Related Articles:

1. BHU Crime Branch Serves Notice on Peacefully Protesting Students, Section 307 Applied
2. National Commission for Scheduled Tribes issues notice to BHU over faulty recruitment process

 

A Journey: How Gandhi Had Opposed the Biometric Project (Transvaal)

0

Black Act to India’s UID Project: A Must Read for All intellectuals: Mahatma Gandhi had opposed the then time Forcibly Biometric Project initiated by Transvaal Commission & Began ‘Satyagrah’

A Journey: How Gandhi Had Opposed the Biometric Project (Transvaal)
 
Mahatma Gandhi had opposed a law similar to UID as a Black Act in South Africa from 1906 to 1914.
 
In August 1906, the Asiatic Law Amendment Ordinance was signed into law in the Transvaal. It was humiliating & discriminating law forcing Indians in the Transvaal to register with the ‘registrar of Asiatics,’ submit to physical examinations, provide fingerprints, and carry a registration certificate at all times. Otherwise, Indians & other ‘Asiatics,’ as they were called, could be fined, imprisoned, or deported. It became known as the ‘Black Act’. 
 
 Immediately, the ordinance was translated and published in the Indian Opinion along with articles denouncing it. Within days, mass meetings were organized. Thousands attended and pledged not to cooperate with the Black Act. Leaders in the Chinese community were contacted, including Mr. Leung Quinn, as they too were affected by the Act. It was the beginning of an eight-year-long resistance campaign. 
 
Prominent leaders pledged their support including Abdul Gani, the Chairman of the Transvaal British Indian Association, Yusuf Ismail Mian (The Chairman of the Transvaal Indian Association, later called the Transvaal Indian Congress), & Ahmad Muhammad Cachalia, a wealthy merchant.
 
A delegation of Indians sailed to London to meet with Secretary of State Lord Elgin, who then publicly renounced the Black Act, but privately only advocated for superficial revisions to the Act.
 
When the certificate offices opened on July 1, 1907, resisters picketed outside the office and dissuaded passing Indians from registering. They gathered support for the noncooperation in temples, mosques, and churches. 
 
Initially known as the ‘Passive Resistance Campaign,’ Gandhi coined the term ‘Satyagraha,’ literally ‘truth-force,’ as an alternative name. 
 
Satyagraha developed as a paradigm for waging nonviolent struggle, advocating ‘active resistance to oppression,’ and would profoundly influence the Indian struggle for independence in later decades. 
 
At the closing of registration, only 511 out of the 13,000 Indians in the region had registered. Some who had registered faced shaming by the resisters, with some tearing up their certificates afterward
 
UID Project 
 
The government wants to simply showcase this project as a means to providing social security to the poor so that it is not deemed unpalatable.
 
A very famous Italian historian said that all history is contemporary history. 
 
When the social security number project started in the US, it was also replicated in Germany. 
 
The social security numbers (SSN) were tattooed on US citizens before (first SSNs were issued in 1935) tattoos were used in Germany under the Nazi Party. 
 
The US numbering programme was known as the “social security” programme, or SS programme. 
 
The Unique Identity Number (UID) project in India is being promoted under the e-governance programme. 
 
The German Nazi Party’s tattoo programme was operated by the social security (SS) division, which had learnt it from US. 
 
In fact, the infamous Auschwitz tattoo began as a number provided by IBM (International Business machines), multinational computer company & funded by Rothschild (Banking Family Member & Founder of East India Cos.) supply machines to the Nazis which produce punch cards to help organize and manage the initial identification and social expulsion of Jews, the confiscation of their property and their extermination.
 
IBM now claims that it had no control over its subsidiaries in Germany after the Nazis took control of them. 
 
What if a similar situation emerged in India, which is not unlikely after UID database is ready? The UID project is going to do almost exactly the same thing, which the predecessors of Hitler did, else how is it that Germany always had the lists of Jewish names even prior to the arrival of the Nazis? 
 
The Nazis got these lists with the help of IBM, which was in the ‘census’ business that included racial census that entailed not only count the Jews but also identifying them.
 
At the United States Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC, there is an exhibit of an IBM Hollerith D-11 card-sorting machine that was responsible for organising the census of 1933 that first identified the Jews. 
 
The government of the day cannot guarantee that in future, when the Nazis or some such sort come to power in India, they would not have access to UID database for vindictive measures against certain sections of the citizenry. 
 
 This is evidently the journey of ‘identification’ efforts from January 1933 to January 2009, when the UID Authority was announced. 
 
The UID and National Population Register is all set to do what IBM did in Germany, Romania and in Europe and elsewhere through ‘solutions’ ranging from the census to providing list of names of Jews to Nazis.
 
This UID Number project seems to be oblivious of the history of numbering human beings. Numbering human beings is like dehumanising them. In fact, Mahatma Gandhi had opposed a law similar to UID as a Black Act in South Africa from 1906 to 1914.
 
He said, “…I have never known legislation of this nature being directed against free men in any part of the world. I know that indentured Indians in Natal are subject to a drastic system of passes, but these poor fellows can hardly be classed as free men” and “…giving of finger prints, required by the Ordinance, was quite a novelty in South Africa.

Source: Wikipedia
 
Here is the Copy of Transvaal Asiatic Registration Certificate:


 (Then Time Aadhaar Letter)