Home Blog Page 2175

Most women worldwide prefer to work at paid jobs; men in their family agree: ILO-Gallop survey

0

In India, more men than women would like to see the females in their family seek employment outside their homes

Working Women

A large majority of women across the globe – 70 per cent – would prefer to work at paid jobs. This includes a majority of women who are currently not working as also women from countries, including  Arab states, where women have traditionally stayed at home.

Interestingly, a majority of men too – 66 per cent – would also like to see women from their families at paid jobs.

In India, however, the situation is reverse. More men – 65 per cent – than women – 52 per cent – would like to see the female sex at paid jobs.

The above findings are the result of a global survey conducted by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) in collaboration with Gallup in 2016. During the survey, 1,49,000 adults from over 142 countries and territories were interviewed.
Other highlights of the report:

  • Most men and women think it is acceptable for the women in their families to have paid jobs outside their home if they want to. Significantly, the response was the same in every region across the world.
  • Families play a significant role in shaping opinion. Among women from households in which it is not acceptable for women to be working outside, 61 per cent said they prefer to stay at home.
  • Almost universally both men and women said the “balance between work and family” was the biggest challenge working women are faced with. However, the nature of the challenges faced is different. While in developed and emerging economies, balancing work and family is the prime concern, unfair treatment at work, lack of affordable child care are the main problems working women face in developing economies.
  • Worldwide the majority of employed women say what they earn is at least a significant source of their household’s income. Over 25 per cent of the women respondents said they provide the main income for their household.
  • While global trends suggest that women and men share some common ground on several issues, women face unique challenges in every region and every demographic.

The full report may be viewed here.
 
 

 

Our “hormonal outbursts” will be your nightmare! Pinjra Tod

0
Statement and image by Pinjra Tod
 
pinjra tod
 

On the eve of International Working Women’s Day, Maneka Gandhi has given a deeply patriarchal, casteist and classist statement to a media channel saying that hostel curfews are necessary as “laxman rekha” for controlling women’s “hormonal outbursts”, that the question of “women’s safety in colleges cannot be solved with just two Bihari guards with dandas”, that there should be separate days for men and women to go to the library at night.

Its clear to us that she has said this today in response to the fact that women students across the country from Benaras to Mumbai, Delhi to Patiala, Lucknow to Hyderabad, Chennai to Ludhiana, Roorkie to Cuttack have come out strongly to assert their presence in the university space and claim over public resources.

Maneka’s allusion to hostel curfews as “laxman rekhas” exposes wonderfully what we have been saying right from the beginning, that these rules are not mere archaic rules, that underlying them is an elaborate system of brahminical control over women’s lives and decisions. It only further proves the fact that what we are fighting against is a massive structure, from the family whose opinion is sought by the administration to legitimise these rules, to the structures of state power that seek to build their manuwadi edifices through regulation of women’s bodies and sexualities. 

Our “hormonal outbursts” disrupts their constructions of “bharat mata”.
Our “hormonal outbursts” rips apart their attempts to control our desires and dreams!
Our “hormonal outbursts” will not be fooled by your jumlas of ‘safety’!
Our “hormonal outbursts” refuses to be reduced to anatomy and biology!
Our “hormonal outbursts” will be your nightmare!

JOIN PINJRA TOD for a demonstration outside the UGC Head office at 12pm tomorrow to demand strict implementation of the Regulations 2015 on “prevention, prohibition and redressal of sexual harassment of women employees and students in higher educational institutes”, which the government that Maneka belongs to, was forced to issue last year. One of the clauses in this circular clearly states that discriminatory regulations cannot be imposed on women students in the name of ‘safety’.

For more details, please check 
https://www.facebook.com/events/884984631641256/

As part of the demonstration, we will also proceed to the Ministry of Women and Child Care Development at Shastri Bhawan around 3pm, to tell Maneka Gandhi that these “laxman rekhas” have been and will be transgressed again and again! 
https://www.facebook.com/events/234950333575472/

Courtesy: Kafila.online

When Jethmalani told Jaitley, “Take my advice, you only answer what I asked”

0

Veteran lawyer, Ram Jethmalani, grilled Finance Minister Arun Jaitley the second day in a row in Rs 10 crore defamation case the latter has filed in the High Court.

Jaitley, according to NDTV, alleged that Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had commited an act of libel by alleging that his wife and daughters were linked to fake companies.

jethmalani jaitley

He said, “Mr Kejriwal has committed a serious act of libel and malicious also, by alleging that my wife and daughter are recipients, are linked to fake companies… (it is) not only false but taking public discourse to a very low level,” he said.

Jethmalani, who’s representing Kejriwal, reminded him that the Delhi chief minister had merely retweeted the tweet posted by journalist Madhu Kishwar.

To which, Jaitley said that many people made irresponsible statements on social media “but when a Chief Minister endorses them, it becomes a grave and serious offence”.

Jaitley, who contested Lok Sabha polls unsuccessfully in 2014, was asked by Jethmalani if that was the first time the finance minister had putting his ‘great reputation’ at test.

He said that an election result was the outcome of “several factors in the constituency and not merely a test of a candidate’s reputation.”

“Considering that (Mr Kejriwal) lost the same Lok Sabha election in 2014 by three and a half lakh votes…” Jaitley added before being interrupted by Jethmalani.

Kejriwal’s lawyer said, “You take my advice, don’t get into irrelevant matters and only answer what I asked.”

Jaitley was also asked if Prime Minister Narendra Modi knew that he will filing the defamation case against Kejriwal. The finance minister replied in negative.

Jethmalani on Monday had cross-examined Finance Minister Arun Jaitley who has filed a Rs 10 crore civil defamation suit in the Delhi High Court against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and five AAP leaders for accusing him of financial bungling in DDCA.

Jaitley’s cross-examination by Jethmalani, who is representing Kejriwal, remained inconclusive and will continue on May 15 and 17.

 

During the proceedings which lasted nearly two hours in a packed court room of Joint Registrar Amit Kumar, a variety of questions including allegations made against him by veteran cricketer Bishan Singh Bedi were put to the Finance Minister.

Jaitley refuted the allegations of financial bungling in DDCA, saying “a letter of Mr Bedi was written in 2015 and I had left the post of President in DDCA in 2013.”

“I strongly deny the contents of this letter in so far it pertains to me… To the best of my knowledge, the contents of the letter are untrue in so far as it relates to my tenure in DDCA,” Jaitley said after going through the letter which was shown to him.

During the cross-examination which was full of drama, lawyers of both sides opposed various questions and answers and Jaitley’s counsel – senior advocates Rajiv Nayar, Sandeep Sethi and Pratibha M Singh – termed some of them “scandalous”.

The Finance Minister, who was put several controversial questions by Jethmalani, maintained calm and said “Mr Kejriwal has committed a serious act of libel through his malicious falsehood. Alleging that my wife and daughter are linked to fake companies was not only false but taking the public discourse to a very low level.”

Jaitley has filed a Rs 10 crore civil defamation suit in the High Court against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders – Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai – for accusing him of financial irregularities in Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) of which he was the president for about 13 years till 2013.

Jethmalani had fired 52 questions to Jaitley in his bid to prove that the lawsuit on defamation by the senior BJP leader was unfounded and should be dismissed. However, 11 questions of the noted senior lawyer were disallowed by Joint Registrar Amit Kumar on the ground that some were matter of record and irrelevant to the case and others were questions of law and not fact and some could be argued during the hearing before the regular court.

The Finance Minister, who headed the DDCA for 13 years, has already tendered evidence in support of his civil defamation suit against Kejriwal and five AAP leaders — Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh and Deepak Bajpai.

However, Jaitley, facing a barrage of questions from his former BJP colleague who was expelled from the party in 2013 for six years, refuted Kejriwal’s claim that the December 2015 CBI raid at the Delhi Chief Minister’s office was “purely” aimed at removing files related to alleged irregularities in the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) in which the Finance Minister was allegedly named.

(With PTI inputs)

Courtesy: Janta Ka Reporter