Home Blog Page 2193

Back to the Basics, Mr Modi?

0

On Sunday, campaigning for a BJP win in the upcoming state elections, Narendra Modi, abandoned all pretense of campaigning for 'development' and delivered a speech with grave communal colour and overtones.

Promoting his 'Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas' slogan (sic), Modi, during an election in Uttar Pradesh’s Fatehpur district, said “Gaon mein agar kabristan banta hai, to gaon mein shamshaan bhi banana chahiye. Agar Ramzan me bijli militi hai, to Diwali me bhi milni chahiye. Agar Holi me bijli milit hai, to Eid par bhi bijli milni chahiye. Bhedbhav nahin hona chahiye" (If a village gets a graveyard, it should get a cremation ground too. If there is electricity during Ramzan , there should be electricity during Diwali too. If there is electricity during Holi, there should be electricity during Eid too. There should not be any discrimination)

The outrage and revulsion caused by this speech was revealed on social media and twitter.  Meanwhile political pundits in the state are asking why the PM needed to resort to such banal imagery? Is the BJP smelling defeat and has therefore resorted to the time-tested communally polarising card?

The speech may be heard here

There were sharp reactions on Twitter. Here is what the General Secretary of the CPI-M, Sitaram Yechury tweeted:

 

‘Prove your adoption’ asks UP Commission for Child Rights to PM Modi

0
 
Two days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi called himself as ‘adopted son’ of Uttar Pradesh in an election rally, the UP State Commission for Protection of Child Rights has sought legal documents from Modi to substantiate his claim of adoption by someone in Uttar Pradesh.
The commission has given seven days time for submitting the papers failing which an apology has been sought from Modi. Further, if legal documents are not submitted the adoption will be deemed illegal and against the spirit of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Member, UPSCPCR, Nahid Lari Khan has also sent copies of the notice to Election Commission of India.
In the notice, Khan has mentioned that commission has taken suo-motto cognizance of Modi’s statement from media wherein he has mentioned that he has been adopted by UP. Khan has termed the statement a direct violation and against the spirit of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015, Chapter 8 Section 56 to 73. In these section the constitution has defined the process of adoption.Khan has stated that Prime Minister has mocked the sanctity of the Act, protected by the constitution and passed by the Parliament. She also stated that sentiments of all those poor children who have been abandoned and also those people who have to go through a process, in accordance with the law to adopt a child.

 

The commission has asked for submitting legal documents that Modi has been legally adopted by someone in the state of Uttar Pradesh, failing which his adoption will be deemed illegal and against the spirit of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
The commission has also sought an apology from Modi as it has hurt the sentiments of children waiting for adoption and parents. Modi has also been requested to visit any such centre and feel the pain and sufferings of the children.
Earlier, according to reports during an election rally at Barabanki, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has stated—“Lord Krishna was born in U.P. and made Gujarat his karmbhoomi (land of work). I was born in Gujarat and U.P. has adopted me … Uttar Pradesh is my mai baap. I am not the son who would betray his mai baap. You have adopted me and it is my duty to work for you.”
After that there have been a war of words and Congress campaigner Priyanka Gandhi too raised it during her UP visit terming that UP already has its own youths to adopt.
Courtesy: twocircles.net

UoH students denied hall tickets by EFLU for taking part in Rohith Vemula protests

0

The two students were members of the Ambedkar Students Association (ASA) at UoH

UoH
Image: Wikipedia

 

Two students from the University of Hyderabad (UoH) say that the English and Foreign Languages University (EFLU) has denied them their PhD entrance exam hall tickets as they were a part of the protests surrounding the death of research scholar Rohith Vemula.

The two students, Kavyashree Raghunath and Manani MS, are members of the Ambedkar Students Association (ASA) at UoH, of which Rohith was a part of, and are doing their MPhil in the Centre for Translation Studies. 

The entrance exam is scheduled to be held on February 25, 2017.

The students claimed that they were not able to download the hall tickets online, and directly approached EFLU's administration. 

Prakash Kona, the proctor of EFLU, stated orally that they both had actively participated in all the protests following Rohith's death, and that he had "photographs of you two on my table", the students alleged.

They also alleged that Kona stated that EFLU Vice-Chancellor Sunaina Singh "didn't want to give admission to people like you".

While Kavyasree Raghunath is the General Secretary of the ASA, Manasi MS is the Cultural Secretary of the association's UoH wing. 

Several students condemned the alleged act by the university, also highlighting that the university has a "history of casteism". 

However, the university has reportedly defended its stand.

Speaking to The New Indian Express, proctor Prakash Kona, said, "There is a university rule which does not allow students involved in acts of indiscipline to write the entrance exam. The two students were present at almost every other protest at the university when they were studying here. EFLU is very serious about ensuring discipline on campus and not allowing such students to spoil the atmosphere. I told them they have the option of writing to the Vice Chancellor and asking to be allowed to give the exam."
This is also not the first time that the university is in the spotlight for denying hall tickets to students on 'disciplinary' grounds.

Last year, 27-year-old Mohammed Jalees, who had finished his MA in Arabic, was told that he couldn’t appear for the PhD entrance exam at the university because of a police case registered against him. 

At the time, Jalees, a student from Kerala, said that he was asked to meet the proctor when he went to collect his admit card for the entrance exam.

The proctor allegedly told him that he was not eligible to appear for the entrance exams as there was a police case registered against him for conducting a beef festival and consuming beef in the university.

Jalees said that the news came as a surprise to him as he was not even aware that a police complaint had been lodged against him.

He said that he was shocked to hear that the university administration could bar him from the entrance exam because he ate beef.

Responding to the latest development, Jalees took to Facebook, to write, "Last year, Hyderabad's EFLU administration denied an entrance exam hall ticket to me, because I ate beef in the campus. Now, the same university administration has denied hall tickets to Kavyasree and Manasi because they were active in the protests for Justice for Rohith Vemula."

"Indulgence in political activism is a crime in the University," he remarked.

Courtesy: The News Minute

Rohith was a Dalit’: Letter from his grandfather surfaces after Guntur collector’s report

0

"Radhika's children were brought up by her, without any support from my family or my son (Mani Kumar)," the letter reads.

 
 
Days after the Guntur district administration in Andhra triggered controversy, by stating that University of Hyderabad (UoH) research scholar Rohith Vemula was not a Dalit, a letter written by Rohith’s paternal grandfather has begun doing the rounds.

The letter which states that Rohith was a Dalit, is addressed to Guntur district collector Kantilal Dande, and submitted in June last year.

“After Radhika Vemula (Rohith's mother) got divorced from my son, I very rarely used to meet her. Once I came to know that Radhika Vemula is suffering [from] paralysis, I met her. At that time, I was privately informed by Anjali Devi, that Radhika did not belong to Vaddera community , but was from the community of scheduled caste…I strongly affirm that she belongs to the SC community and her children also get the same caste because they were brought up by her, without any support from my family or my son (Mani Kumar). Therefore our caste cannot be attributed to her or her children,” the letter reads.

Last week, the state government has reportedly decided to 'cancel' Rohith's Scheduled Caste certificate.

After an 'investigation' that lasted over a year, the District-Level Scrutiny Committee (DLSC) alleged that the SC certificate was “fraudulently” obtained by Rohith and his mother Radhika Vemula.

The controversy over Rohith's caste first broke out after a certificate of his Raja Vemula stated that he was a ‘Vaddera’, a caste which is categorised as OBC in AP. It was later revealed that Rohith’s father Mani Kumar was a Vaddera, and his mother was a Mala. However, Mani Kumar was an alcoholic who deserted the family once he realised that Radhika was a Dalit, the family claimed. Therefore, Rohith, who never knew his father, claimed his mother's caste, and grew up as a Mala.

The state has also served a show-cause notice to Rohith's family.

Confirming that the family received the notice, Raja Vemula earlier told TNM, "They have threatened to cancel the certificate if we can't 'prove' our caste. It is ridiculous. We are very disheartened and the authorities are putting us through mental torture." 
"We have been talking to lawyers, and plan to respond soon," he added.

Rohith's mother has also alleged that the entire issue was to 'shame' her family and her background.

The latest report by the Andhra government would also have a direct impact on a case pending with the Cyberabad police against UoH Vice Chacellor Appa Rao Podile.

A police case was registered at the Gachibowli police station against Bandaru Dattatreya and Appa Rao, under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after the death of Rohith.

Now with the report claiming that Rohith was not a Dalit, the entire case against the VC and the Minister could collapse, if the family does not 'prove' Rohith's caste.

Courtesy: The News Minute