Home Blog Page 2198

Indian soldiers forced to buy duplicate medals? Army has handful of them; 10 lakh pending for delivered: Ex-Lt Gen

0
A retired lieutenant general of Special Forces of the Indian Army has alleged a major scam going on in India's armed forces – of forcing soldiers to buy up duplicate medals, because the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, claims the medals are "in short supply.”

The allegation by Lt General PC Katoch (retired), a veteran officer of the Special Forces (units which are under the direct command of the Indian military and specifically organised, trained, and are equipped to conduct and support special operations) comes amidst Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar seeking a report on the short supply of medals that has forced soldiers to buy duplicate ones from the market.

The medals are awarded for various achievements, including bravery, distinguished service among others. Katoch, quoting sources, says, "While those medals awarded at investiture ceremonies were available, lakhs of others awarded over the years are not."

"This includes those given for completing a certain number of years in service, serving in difficult areas or taking part in various operations", says Katoch, adding, "The situation has been such that only a handful of medals have been officially issued over the last 7-8 years while over 10 lakh medals are pending."

Says Katoch, "Defence Minister Parrikar should also for figures of how many medals were dispatched by post to soldiers, say, in the last 10 years long ‘after’ after they had retired from service. The numbers would likely shock him."

Insisting that "the Medal Section is quite capable of obfuscating the real figures", Katoch says, "According to an unnamed source in the Ministry of Defence, non-availability was due to some financial constraints. This is nothing but a weak bureaucratic cover up especially considering the crores of rupees from the defence budget that gets surrendered each financial year."

"One favourite place for purchasing duplicate medals is Gopinath Bazar in Delhi Cantonment", says Katoch, adding, "The difference between the original and the duplicate is that the name of the soldier and his service number is engraved on the rim of the original medal."

According to Katoch, a soldier buys a duplicate medal because wearing it "on his chest that adds to his ‘izzat’. He does not favour his chest bare without the medals due to him and – consequently less medals compared to his contemporaries."

"The problem of giving the medals to soldiers’ years after these were awarded is endemic and the actual issue is institutionalized corruption", believes Katoch.

Pointing to why Ministry of Defence officials reject providing medals, Katoch recalls, "when the Government of India decided to award the 50-year Independence Medal to all security forces (Armed Forces, Para Military Forces, Central Armed Police Forces and Police personnel included), the overall contract worked out to some Rs 100 crore, even though the duplicate was available in Gopinath Bazar for less than half that price."

"Awarding the contract itself took considerable time because vendors were being hunted who could pass on Rs 20 crore under the table before the agreement was inked", Katoch says.

"It is also very likely that the same vendor or vendors, who produce the actual medals, also makes the duplicates. This can be easily verified from the shops selling duplicate medals", suspects Katoch, adding,
"Obviously, delayed delivery of actual medals boosts the sales of duplicate medals. After all, the vendor has to somewhat make up, if not completely, the bribe paid while securing the contract for delivering the actual medals."

Adani Group “seeks to change” Australian law to obtain Native Title nod for $16 billion Coal Mining project: W&J

0

The Wangan and Jagalingou (W&J) Traditional Owners Council, who have been fighting against one of the biggest coal mining projects of the world, said they would “resist industry push for amended Native Title Act to secure Carmichael mine proposal” and “seek court order to strike out" the move. This is against Adani's project off the Gold Coast of Australia. (https://envirojustice.org.au/sites/default/files/files/Submissions%20and%20reports/The_Adani_Brief_by_Environmental_Justice_Australia.pdf)

Adani Group

Spokesperson for W&J Adrian Burragubba said, “The document Adani is trying to pass off as an Indigenous Land Use Agreement (ILUA) with our people is illegitimate. We launched action last year to defeat this dodgy deal and we are now taking decisive action in the Federal Court to have this fake agreement struck out”.

Burragubba said, “We have put evidence before the National Native Title Tribunal to prove that Adani does not have an agreement with W&J for its mine of mass destruction, which will destroy our ancestral homelands and waters, the cultural landscape and our heritage.”

He added, “Three times we have rejected any deal with the Indian mining conglomerate. Now Adani are on the back foot and have run crying to the Queensland Resources Council and the Federal Attorney General, asking them to do their bidding by pushing through an ‘Adani amendment’ to the Native Title Act.”

Burragubba claimed, his organization has come to know about Adani's move to amend the law from former Federal Resources Minister Ian MacFarlane, who “boasted at a Townsville business breakfast last week that he has spoken to his ‘good mates in Canberra’ about amending native title law.”

He alleged, “This is just additional proof that the Turnbull government is in bed with the Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and the Queensland mining industry.”

Representing W&J, lawyer Colin Hardie said, “Adani and the mining industry are trying to manufacture a sense of crisis and appear desperate to force the Federal government to rush through changes to the Native Title Act to suit their interests.”

The Native Title Act requires all members the Registered Native Title Claimants (RNTC) to sign the ILUA, which is a voluntary agreement between a native title group and others about the use of land and waters, for any changes.

At a meeting of the indigenous group called by the industry group, said W&J, over “200 of those in attendance were people not previously identified as W&J people”, adding, worse, some members of the RNTC refused to sign the purported ILUA – the reason why the Adani is seeking to amend the Act.

Meanwhile, an Australian not-for-profit legal practice group based in Melbourne, Environmental Justice Australia (EJA), has come up with an Adani Brief, which it has forwarded to the Australian governments and potential financiers seeking to back Adani’s coalming project, saying such a move “may expose them to financial and reputational risks.”

Giving details of the Adani Brief, EJA lawyer and report author Ariane Wilkinson said, “The extremely concerning international track record of the Adani Group in India raises serious questions about whether they should be allowed to do business in Australia.”

The report, among other issues, focuses on sinking of a ship carrying Adani coal, which saw oil and coal spill off Mumbai’s coast, damaging tourism, polluting the marine environment and attracting a AU$975,000 court fine; and constructing Hajira Port without approval, destroying habitat, claiming land and blocking access to fishing communities, which resulted in a court order to pay AU$4.8 million for compensation and restoration.