Home Blog Page 2201

Former Gujarat BJP mayor faces heat for posting porn images on party’s WhatsApp group

0

Barely days after the Gujarat BJP found itself amidst considerable embarrassment because of its workers’ alleged involvement in a sex racket, the saffron party has hit the news headline for another wrong reason in Gujarat.

According to a report by Aaj Tak, former Surat mayor, Rajubhai Desai’s decision to share obscene photos on the BJP’s official WhatsApp group on 9 February has caused a huge controversy in Gujarat.

gujarat mayor porn

No sooner did Desai poste the porn images, several women BJP supporters left the group, which was essentially created to keep workers abreast of the party’s programmes on a regular basis. The group, according to the report, had several women workers of the BJP as members.

The report further added that the saffron party immediately deleted the WhatsApp group in question as soon as the incident of porn images surfaced.

Desai, for his part, denied that he had deliberately sent the images to the group adding that the porn photos were accidently shared in the group due to a technical fault.

 

“I don’t know how it happened but I am sure this was the work of some miscreant who took advantage when I had stepped out of my office for nearly two hours that day. My phone had run out of battery so I had left it in my office while it was being charged,” Desai was quoted by Ahmedabad Mirror.

As expected, the incident has been dominating the conversation among party cadres with the Surat BJP Chief Nitin Thaker seeking an explanation about the incident from Desai.

Condemning the act, Thaker said, “After hearing of the incident, I sought an explanation from Raju Desai. We will take appropriate action against him after he has sent a reply.”

The latest incident comes just days after local police arrested eight persons including local leaders of BJP in connection with the gangrape of the victim at Naliya town in Kutch district.

In her FIR, the 24-year-old woman alleged that she was raped by at least nine persons on different occasions after an accused made a video of the act and threatened to circulate the video clip.

The victim has alleged in her FIR that the accused have been running a sex racket in Kutch district and forcing victims to have sex with numerous persons after blackmailing them by making video.

Courtesy: Janta Ka Reporter
 

Security tightened in Tamil Nadu after SC sends Sasikala to jail in DA case

0

Koovathur (TN): Security has been strengthened across Tamil Nadu after the Supreme Court today convicted AIADMK General Secretary V K Sasikala in the disproportionate assets case.

sasikala

Police presence was especially stepped up at a resort, about 80 kms from Chennai, where MLAs supporting her have been housed since the past few days.

Sasikala herself stayed overnight at the resort.

Police personnel were also seen maintaining vigil on the roads in Chennai and other parts of the state. A unit of Tamil Nadu Police with senior officials just entered Golden Bay Resort in Kovathur where Sasikala is staying, reports ANI.

 

The apex court today quashed the Karnataka High Court verdict acquitting Sasikala in the disproportionate assets case and asked her to surrender herself forthwith.

She was elected as the Legislature Party Leader on February 5, paving the way for her becoming Chief Minister.

However, two days later, Panneerselvam raised a banner of revolt against her, alleging he was forced to step down for her.

Over the past few days the rival camps traded charges and counter-charges with some MPs and MLAs deserting Sasikala.

Soon after the verdict, BJP MP Subramanian Swamy tweeted, “After 20 years I won. Now turn of TDK Buddhu PC BC & Tata to join in jail (sic).”
 

JK defends Article 370 in Delhi High Court

0

Matter settled by Supreme Court, can’t be contested: Advocate General pleads

article 370

Invoking the constitutional bench judgments delivered by the Supreme Court on the issue, J&K Government on Monday contested a petition filed in Delhi High Court which has challenged the 1954 Presidential Order that prevents applicability of any amendment in Constitution of India to Jammu and Kashmir.

The petition (Surjeet Singh Vs Union of India & Others) has challenged the 1954 Order that adds a proviso to Article 368 of the Constitution. The added proviso says “no such amendment shall have effect in relation to the State of Jammu and Kashmir unless applied by order of the President under Clause (1) of Article 370.”

 

“We pleaded whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain the petition on the grounds of doctrine of forum convenience,” State Advocate General Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, who represented the State, told Greater Kashmir over phone from New Delhi. He was aided by State’s standing counsel in the Supreme Court, Muhammad Shoieb Alam, and Advocate GM Kawoosa.

In his argument the Advocate General said he referred to the two constitutional judgments by the apex court, Pooranlal Lakhanpal Vs President of India and Sampant Prakash Vs State of J&K and others.

“The Supreme Court has settled the issue through these constitutional judgments and hence the High Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition,” said Ganai.

The case was heard by the division bench headed by the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and has been listed for next hearing on March 20.

“We contested the petition at the pre-notice stage and no notice has been issued to the State over the petition,” said the Advocate General.

Last week a New Delhi based newspaper reported that the Delhi HC had asked the petitioners why they hadn’t gone to the J&K HC to which petitioner’s counsel had said that “judges in J&K High Court do not take oath to bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India as by law established”, and a question regarding a Constitutional principle could not, therefore, be heard before that Court.

Subsequently the Delhi HC had asked for a reply from the J&K government and Centre. There was no argument on the issue in the court today, said the Advocate General.

This article was first published on Greater Kashmir

UP Polls 2017: Editor of Jagran.com arrested for violating EC guidelines

0

EC had ordered FIRs against Hindi daily, agency over 'exit polls'

Jagran Editor
Image credit: Facebook/Shashank Shekhar Tripathi

Jagran.com editor Shekhar Tripathi was arrested late Monday night by the Uttar Pradesh police for publishing an exit poll after the first phase of Uttar Pradesh assembly elections allegedly in violation of the law operational during polls. The Election Commission has said that such publication of an opinion poll when a state was in the midst of five phase polls, was in violation of its guidelines asking news organisations not to carry/publish any exit/opinion poll during the election period. 

PTI also reports that the Uttar Pradesh Police also raided the homes of Sukirti Gupta (CEO  of Jagran New Media), Varun Sharma (Dy Editor, Jagran English Online) and Puja Sethi, Digital Head.

The Election Commission had, on Monday, ordered the filing of FIRs against the management and editor-in-chief of Dainik Jagran for alleged violation of its guidelines. The Election Commission had, on Monday, ordered the filing of FIRs against the management and editor-in-chief of Dainik Jagran for alleged violation of its guidelines.

 

In a statement issued, Dainik Jagran newspaper said news about exit polls of Uttar Pradesh was published "inadvertently on its English website and it was immediately removed" after being detected by senior officials of the group.

In a statement, the newspaper said, “It may be clarified that except for the digital English platform no news item attributing to exit poll was published in Dainik Jagran newspaper.”

“On the English website a news was inadvertently published mentioning about an exit poll. However, the mistake was self corrected and the news report was immediately removed when the report was noticed by senior officials of the group.

“We clarify that we fully comply with the directions which has been issued by Election Commission of India and are in the process of filing a detailed fact-based response with the ECI clarifying the position,” it said.

Late on Monday evening, the Election Commission (EC) on Monday ordered lodging of FIRs against a Hindi daily and an agency in 15 districts of Uttar Pradesh in connection with the illegal publication of the poll .

Taking a serious view of the violation of its directions, the EC shot off a letter to the Chief Electoral Officer of Uttar Pradesh in which it reminded the CEO that the "offence under Section 126A is punishable by imprisonment for a term up to 2 years or with fine or both."
 
 
The EC said that it has been brought to its notice that "the Dainik Jagran newspaper has published result of exit polls conducted by a company by the name of Resource Development International (I) Pvt Ltd on the first phase of elections in UP, through their website."
 
The poll watchdog pointed out that Section 126A(1) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 provides that no person shall conduct any exit poll and publish or publicise by means of print or electronic media, the result of any exit poll during such period as may be notified by the Commission.

As per the Commission's directions, exit polls cannot be conducted and publicised by means of print and electronic media or dissemination in any other manner starting from February 4, 2017 at 7am to March 8, 2017 at 5.30 pm.

The reported violation by the Resource Development International (I) Pvt Ltd and Dainik Jagran by conducting the exit poll and dissemination of its results amounts to offence under Sections 126A and 126B of RP Act, 1951, the EC said. Section 188 of the Indian Penal Code relates to disobeying orders of an authority will also be used, it said.

"The Commission has directed that the district election officers of each of the districts covered under the first phase of poll shall immediately file FIR against the Managing Director and/or such other authorities of RDI and Dainik Jagran including the Managing Editor/Editor in Chief/Editor/Chief Editor of the newspaper under Section 188 of IPC read with Section 126A and 126B of RP Act, 1951," the letter said.

73 constituencies in 15 districts of Uttar Pradesh went for assembly polls in phase one on February 11 .

A spokesperson of the Commission said an FIR will also be lodged by district election officer of Lucknow for the violation.

Congress welcomed the move by EC. "The EC has taken suo motu cognisance and has directed action and registration of a case. We welcome that," Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said.

He also said the "basic question" is that under what threat are the owners of the Indian media that they are ready to do such a thing.

"This is not just a question of an exit poll, but is a matter of concern that despite knowledge of the law and EC rules a newspaper still publishes exit polls. This calls for concern and introspection," he said.

Asked about the role of Priyanka Gandhi in campaigning for the party candidates in UP, he did not give a direct reply, saying the party leadership in-charge of the state would speak better about this.

To another question on registration of a case against SP MLA for murder of a rape victim, Tewari said the law will take its own course independently.