Home Blog Page 2595

Muslim policeman at duty beaten up and paraded in Maharashtra

0


Photo: Two Circles

Latur (Maharahstra): In an apparent display of anarchy, a Muslim policeman is beaten up badly and paraded in the streets by a mob in Pangaon town of Latur District in Maharashtra.
On Friday morning at around 9 am ASI Shaikh Yunus Pashamiya, 56, was surrounded by 200 men and beaten up by sticks after he was asked to hold saffron flag, parade and dance.
Maharashtra was celebrating Maratha warrior Shivaji’s birth anniversary on Friday due to which people were tying saffron flags in different areas.

As per sources, on Friday Pashamiya had restricted some men from tying saffron flags in certain sensitive areas sighting orders from superiors but people got angry due to such opposition and warned him of consequences.

Reportedly, Pashamiya was singled out from policemen and was beaten up brutally by the mob. Reports suggest that mob also tried to shave his beard off and was asked to make parade with saffron flag in his hands.

Name of one local ‘Chavan’ is making round on social media for being responsible of instigating the mob against Pashamiya.

One local told TwoCircles.net on condition of anonymity that mob targeted Pashamiya even though he was standing with his colleague ASI K Awaskar.
He is now recuperating at civil hospital in Latur. Family of Pashamiya could not be contacted for comment on the incident.

Meanwhile, Imtiaz Jaleel, MIM MLA from Aurangabad of Maharashtra twitted “Shocking: Muslim policeman beaten up/paraded on street with saffron flag in Latur village for doing his duty/ shame”.
 
(http://twocircles.net/2016feb21/1455995939.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Twocirclesnet-IndianMuslim+%28TwoCircles.net+-+Indian+Muslim+News%29#.VssfteZL6Vx)
 

Rights body cries halt to sedition mania in Bangladesh

0

Human Rights Watch calls for repeal of sedition laws and abusive criminal defamation

The US-based Human Rights Watch has called upon Bangladeshi authorities to immediately withdraw all criminal charges filed against the editors of the Daily Star and Prothom Alo, the country’s leading newspapers. Bangladesh should repeal its criminal defamation and sedition laws, which violate international standards, said a statement issued by HRW two days ago.

Full text of the statement:

As of the time of writing, the editor of the English-language Daily Star, Mahfuz Anam, faced a total of 54 criminal defamation cases and 15 sedition cases, largely for publishing corruption allegations from military sources several years ago. On February 16, 2016, a court in Narayangunj issued an arrest warrant against Anam in a case filed by a private lawyer.

Fifty-five cases have been filed against Matiur Rahman, the editor of Prothom Alo, Bangladesh’s highest circulation Bengali-language daily newspaper (and the sister paper of the Daily Star), as well as against the newspaper and some journalists associated with the paper, for criminal defamation and “hurting religious sentiment.” Each criminal defamation charge allows for two years’ imprisonment, and each sedition charge for three.

“Criminal charges against editors of the leading newspapers in Bangladesh are a clear attempt to intimidate all media in the country,” said Brad Adams, Asia director. “A government controlling almost all seats in parliament and all national executive authority has to be particularly protective of a free press – or risk turning Bangladesh into an authoritarian state.”

The cases are part of a larger, organized assault on independent media in Bangladesh over several years.

Bangladeshi authorities have closed critical media houses, jailed editors, tried bloggers, and charged journalists with contempt of court for reporting unfavorably on government actions. The editor of Amar Desh newspaper, Mahmudur Rahman, has been jailed without trial since 2013 on charges of sedition and unlawful publication of intercepted conversations.

The editors of the Daily Star and Prothom Alo were among a significant segment of public opinion backing the “minus two” effort by the military when it effectively took power and installed a caretaker government from 2007 to 2009. The military and segments of Bangladeshi society backed a move to remove Sheikh Hasina, the leader of the Awami League and current prime minister, and Khaleda Zia, the leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party and a former prime minister. Both were accused of corruption.

The charges against Anam and the Daily Star are related to corruption allegations against Sheikh Hasina and other current government officials based on information provided by the country’s military intelligence service, the director general forces intelligence (DGFI). At the time, the DGFI was leading the “minus two” effort and routinely threatened and intimidated the media and civil society. DGFI was also responsible for extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances. The allegations were published in 2007, but the current assault against Anam came about as a result of a February 3, 2016 admission on his part that he relied on uncorroborated information from DGFI when he published the stories. Anam said he regretted having published material without sufficient corroboration.

The assault on speech affects not only the media, but also critical civil society. Journalists report engaging in self-censorship. Activists and human rights defenders have faced charges, arrest, and intimidation. Bloggers who have expressed atheist sentiments have been killed, yet others have faced charges of insulting religious feelings

The charges against Matiur Rahman of Prothom Alo stem from a series of articles the paper ran on alleged irregularities in the purchase of power tillers by a local government office, as well as for running a cartoon in the paper’s political satire section. Rahman surrendered at the Jhalakati jail following an arrest warrant issued in January 2015. He was granted bail and given permission to be physically absent from further hearings in the cases. The cases have not yet been resolved.

Both the Daily Star and Prothom Alo have faced government retaliation for their reporting. Media personnel have alleged to Human Rights Watch that this includes a ban on advertising by large private companies in the two papers. Several corporate sources speaking anonymously stated that they had received these instructions in an article published by Al Jazeera in October 2015.

“Defamation should not be treated as a crime,” Adams said. “If a newspaper intentionally publishes false information that harms an individual’s reputation, then a civil defamation case is the proper remedy, so long as a fair and impartial trial can be assured. But Bangladesh should not be in the business of jailing journalists for what they write.”

Human Rights Watch called for repeal of the sedition law, which is overly broad and vague. The law states that anyone by show or use of force or “any other unconstitutional means” who “subverts or attempts or conspires to subvert the confidence, belief or reliance of the citizens to this constitution or any of its article, his such act shall be sedition and such person shall be guilty of sedition.” Anam faces at least 15 sedition charges.

Bangladesh’s sedition and criminal defamation laws are contrary to the country’s international human rights obligations. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which Bangladesh ratified in 2000, prohibits restrictions on freedom of expression on national security grounds unless they are provided by law, strictly construed, and necessary and proportionate to address a legitimate threat. Such laws cannot put the right itself in jeopardy. The United Nations Human Rights Committee, which interprets the ICCPR, has said that states parties should move toward abolishing criminal defamation and that no one should ever risk imprisonment for defamation.

Human Rights Watch said that laws imposing criminal penalties for peaceful expression are of particular concern because of their chilling effect on free speech. The UN special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression has stated that with such laws in place, individuals face the constant threat of being arrested and subjected to criminal trials, fines, and imprisonment, as well as the stigma of having a criminal record.

The assault on speech affects not only the media, but also critical civil society. Journalists report engaging in self-censorship. Activists and human rights defenders have faced charges, arrest, and intimidation. Bloggers who have expressed atheist sentiments have been killed, yet others have faced charges of insulting religious feelings. A 2014 media policy banned speech that is “anti-state,” “ridicules the national ideology,” and “is inconsistent with Bangladesh’s culture,” and would restrict the reporting of “anarchy, rebellion, or violence.” The government is currently drafting an onerous and overly broad law on publishing in electronic media.

“These criminal charges are clearly a form of retribution against political enemies of the government,” said Adams. “And while it is going after journalists, the government has taken no action to hold members of DGFI accountable for the extrajudicial killings, disappearances, and torture that took place during the caretaker period. Bangladesh’s sedition and criminal defamation laws need to be repealed, and charges against all media and other critics withdrawn immediately.”

Why Adivasi leader Soni Sori was attacked: Complaint against IG Kalluri

0


Image: thewire.in
 
Soni Sori was on the verge of filing an FIR against IG Kalluri when she was attacked

 
One of the main likely reasons why Adivasi leader, Soni Sori was attacked on the night of Saturday, February 20 was that for a week-ten days before the attack she was trying to get an FIR registered under ST/SC atrocities prevention act against IG, Police Chhatisgarh, Kalluri.
 
Soni Sori reportedly made two attempts, one was at Dantewada ST/SC thana and another was at ST/SC Thana Raipur. But both the times, the thana (police station) refused to even accept her complaint. At Dantewada, she was misinformed and given an absurd reason that Kalluri is an Adivasi and thus a complaint against him cannot be filed at this particular thana.
 
Thereafter, Soni Sori and her lawyers tried to look into the veracity of the claim It was found to be untrue. Later, it was confirmed that he is not an ST. Kamma’s World¸ a web portal that can be viewed at http://kammasworld.blogspot.in/2010/09/kamma-ips-officers.html  proudly has him as IPS officer from this caste at serial number 31.

Over the next few days, she got busy with the Mardum encounter case, where she was helping the family raise the issue of the fake encounter in Mardum thana in Bastar district, in which Hidma was killed.
 
Her second attempt to file an FIR against Kalluri himself was on February 15, 2016, when she took Hidma’s wife and seven children to Raipur for a press conference. In Raipur her complaint was refused saying the incident did not lie within their geographical jurisdiction [This is a stock response of the police despite rulings of the Supreme Court of India repeatedly maintaining that a criminal complaint can be filed outside the geographical area from where it is crimes are alleged to have taken place.]
 
Soni Sori then decided to go directly to the SP Dantewada for filing this compliant when she was attacked. Sabrangindia has accessed a copy of the Complaint she was trying to file in which she clearly says how she fears for her life because of him, Kalluri a senior police officer of the Chhatisgarh state.

The copy of the FIR with attached media clippings as evidence can be read here.

Her team of lawyers are now considering lodging a complaint with the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes which takes up cases of atrocities against STs and also pursue the question of registering an FIR against Kalluri.
 
Meanwhile,  letters to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders are also being sent by supporters and many protests being held across the country in protest against the attack on Soni Sori. Draft Letter to OHCHR(UN)
 
Please also see NHRC intervenes as BJP govt. hounds defenders of Adivasis' rights in Bastar
https://sabrangindia.in/article/nhrc-intervenes-bjp-govt-hounds-defenders-adivasis-rights-bastar

Soni Sori flown to Delhi, fears for her children's safety
https://www.sabrangindia.in/article/soni-sori-flown-delhi-fears-her-children%E2%80%99s-safety

How Zee TV fuelled state action against JNU students

0

Local police filed their FIR not on the basis of the information they gathered on campus on February 9, but on the basis of Zee TV footage made available to them.

THE HOOT desk reports the incitement its anchors indulged in
 

 

If there is a sedition case filed against the alleged anti-nationalism on display on the Jawaharlal Nehru University campus, it is because of Zee News more than Times Now. Arnab Goswami’s Newshour is getting too much credit for feeding the outrage over slogans shouted on the JNU campus. Zee News was off the block first, was even more single-minded than Times Now in demanding accountability if that is possible, and was strident in questioning the BJP, the Press Club and others as to why the police was not being brought into the picture. This channel’s answer to Goswami is Zee’s Rohit Sardana who converted his show called Taal Thok Ke into an inquisition against the campus protests and its leaders.

But first, Zee’s contribution to the first information report registered at the Vasant Kunj North police station.


Extract from FIR filed naming JNUSU President Kanhaiya Lal (sic) and others,  dated 11-02-2016, in Police station Vasant Kunj North
 
Here is what the FIR says: At 7.30 pm on the evening of February 9 a call was received by the PCR to report that two groups had clashed near the Sabarmati Dhabha and the situation was deteriorating. A police team set out and found two groups approaching Ganga Dhabha and shouting slogans. The FIR says the local police and JNU security staff maintained distance between them, and media persons were also present. By about 8.30 the groups dispersed and went their way still shouting slogans.

On February 10 the police came to know that Zee TV had telecast a programme which showed that the students had been chanting anti-national slogans. The FIR says the police requested footage from Zee TV and a CD given to them showed them the kind of slogans which were being shouted, including Pakistan Zindabad. The slogans are further described and then an FIR registered on the basis of the offences recorded.

The short point is that the police were present when the groups were clashing and shouting slogans, they stayed on the campus until the two sides dispersed, they saw no reason to register any complaint on the basis of the slogan shouting they heard. It is the Zee video which gave them actionable evidence. The implication is that Zee did their recording by being there in time for the action, did it at length, and showed the ‘anti-national’ parts the next day. How did the police come to know of the programme shown? It does not say. Did the channel bring it to their notice?

FIR no 0110 at police station Vasant Kunj North was registered on the 11th of October. Two days after the event, even though a police team was present at the spot on the 9th night. Who brought pressure on them to register an FIR?

Reporter or anchor, from February 10 onwards the programming was heavily judgmental. On a Feb 10 Aaj Ka Special the slogan shouting is replayed and Pavan Nara of Zee News intones, how long should we tolerate this? An ABVP student activist gets time to have her full say on the anti national behavior of the slogan shouters.

On another programme the same day anchor Sudhir Chaudhury harangues viewers about the amount of money spent on JNU students by the government, and invokes the sacrifice of Lance Naik Hanumanthappa. He goes on to talk about the bill France has passed taking away the citizenship of those indulging in terrorism.

Chaudhury of Zee and Arnab Goswami of Times Now curiously have the same points of attack against the students, and both channels repeated these every day. That they are getting an education heavily subsidized by the tax payer, and this subsidy is feeding anti-national activities. And that at a time when Lance Naik Hanumathappa was fighting for his life here were these students making a mockery of his sacrifice by supporting those convicted for terrorism such as Afzal Guru.

Sardana and Zee anchor Sudhir Chaudhary between them conducted two to three shows on the JNU agitiation every day on the 10th, 11th and 13th that are archived on YouTube. The first conducted inquisitions, telling student leader Umar Khalid nastily at one point, when he asked a question, you are not here to ask me questions, you are here to answer my questions.

On the 10th Zee news was asking the Vice Chancellor of JNU whether he would take action against those who had shouted anti national slogans. On YouTube the programmes are billed thus:
MUST WATCH!! Anti India event organiser of JNU ripped apart by Zee News Anchor Rohit Sardana !!

On the 11th the channel was asking the Press Club of india president why he had allowed the premises of the club to be used for a meeting by SAR Geelani and not filed a written complaint against Geelani for the way the meeting went. The same day on an edition of Taal Thok Ke Sardana was upbraiding the BJP spokesperson on his show: Sambit Patra you kept saying desh drohi hai but your government did not take any suo moto action against these sloganeering students, why not?

He goes on to jibe, “The same day Lance Nayak Hanumanthappa dies the government that boasts of a 56 inch chest does nothing?” He gets so aggressive that he puts Sambit Patra on the defensive.
At one point JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar tells Sardana, ‘TRP ke liye pura desh ka mohol kharab kar rahein hai”. ( You are destroying the peace of the country for the sake of TRPs.) He is told to listen, while the slogans that have been telecast many times over on this channel are repeated for him to hear.

Zee TV’s programmes amounted to incitement against the students of JNU. On February 19 when Ravish Kumar of NDTV conducted a programme registering his objection to the way TV anchors were behaving, a long extract played without the visuals was from a harangue by Rohit Sardana, using the words desh drohi.

Courtesy: The Hoot

As police wait at the gate, JNU students accused of sedition say they won’t refuse arrest

0

The university’s administration has barred the police from entering the premises, and the five students have been cordoned off at the admin block.

 
As police wait at the gate, JNU students accused of sedition say they won't refuse arrest

Photo Credit: Twitter/ANI

The team from Delhi's Criminal Investigation Department were waiting at the gates of Jawaharlal Nehru University on Monday as five students accused of sedition sat cordoned off in the admin block, having returned to the campus late on Sunday night. Among them was Umar Khalid, whom the police have been looking for since February 11. Khalid has been on the police’s radar after he was named as the person who organised the Afzal Guru protests that set off the ongoing fracas. The students have said they are choosing not to leave the campus, but won't refuse arrest if the police choose to take such action.

The university's administration has called a meeting with its top officials, and reports said vice chancellor Jagdeesh Kumar is also holding a meeting with the Registrar and Students' Union representatives. Meanwhile, the police have reportedly said they will not enter the University premises without the vice chancellor's permission. Delhi Police Commissioner BS Bassi on Monday said if the accused students are innocent, they should assist the police's ongoing investigation.

Khalid and the other students – Anant Prakash Narayan, Ashutosh Kumar, Rama Naga and Anirban Bhattacharya – have denied that they were involved in any “anti-national” activities. They claim that the videos showing students shouting “aazadi” were doctored. It was based on these videos that the police sent a look-out notice for Khalid, and the issue spiralled out of control. Naga on Monday said that some protestors joined the Afzal Guru event on February 9 and shouted the anti-national slogans in question, but were asked to leave.

Scroll.in further reports:
The Big Story: Genuine JNU
The absconding students of Jawaharlal Nehru University returned to campus late on Sunday night. Ten days after the Delhi Police began looking for them to book them for allegedly shouting anti-national slogans, some of the students showed up in front of the administration block and began delivering speeches. The students are accused of sedition in connection with events on February 9 and 11, when anti-national slogans were allegedly raised on campus, although there is little clarity yet of who said what.

The university administration said it would not permit the Delhi Police to come on to campus last night, after earlier having permitted the authorities to storm into JNU and pick up the student union president Kanhaiya Kumar, who has also been accused of sedition. Though the students said they were ready to surrender, this time it seemed as if the administration and the lawyers working with the students had put together a plan to turn up and build support on campus rather than be quietly picked up like criminals. It bears repeating: At worst, these students have been accused of raising slogans – not looting armories or shooting at people.

The standoff, with Delhi Police waiting at the JNU gates, cannot last forever. , It seems only a matter of time before the students will be arrested. How this plays out is crucial. Delhi Police performed terribly last week, unable to prevent attacks on journalists and Kumar inside a court complex while leaks from the Home Ministry suggested it had overreacted in arresting the JNUSU president.The police will first have to ensure the safety of all the accused at a time when goons seem to be baying for their blood. But the bigger question of the Delhi Police's living up to its duty remains in its investigation of the case: With crucial evidence turning out to be doctored, can we trust the police to genuinely appraise the nature of the charges against the students?

Courtesy: Scroll.in
 

Soni Sori flown to Delhi, fears for her children’s safety

0

Adivasi leader and human rights defender Soni Sori who was attacked with grease-like chemical in Jagdalpur in Chhattisgarh on Saturday night was flown to Delhi on Sunday evening for further treatment.

Speaking to the media at Raipur, Sori said: “I will speak in detail after I reach New Delhi. What is happening is not good. Now, I fear for my life and my children’s safety.”  

The attack on Sori came days after her failed attempt to lodge a complaint against the controversial inspector general of police (IGP), Bastar range, SRP Kalluri for instigating the trader community of Dantewada against her. The Dantewada SP, Kamlochan Kashyap meanwhile sought to dismiss the attack on Sori. “There was no attack on her. Wrong vocabulary is being used for the incident”.

Asked if she knew the identity of her attackers, she said, “I received a call at 6.12 p.m. on Saturday that some people were conspiring to attack me. I told the person that I would meet him today. I was getting constant reminders from the people that the police want to eliminate me. Most of my fight has been against the police department in Chattisgarh”.

Sori is a member of the Aam Aaadmi Party (AAP). A statement issued by AAP said, “Soni Sori’s attackers directly threatened her to stop raising her voice and to give up the Mardoom case. She has been warned that they would attack her daughter too if she does not stop”.

Sori was attacked by few men in Geedam as she was travelling back to her village from Jagdalpur after discussions with her legal team late in the night on Saturday, February 20. A blackish chemical substance was thrown on her face which has since been causing intense burning and pain. She was first hospitalised at Geedam and then moved to Jagdalpur.

Earlier too she had expressed fears of an attack due to open threats being made against her by the police. These police threats have intensified over past months since Sori has been leading campaigns and demonstrations against the atrocities committed by the police against Adivasis.

On December 18,2015, Sabrangindia had carried a detailed interview of Soni Sori conducted for us by Isha Khandelwal: https://www.sabrangindia.in/interview/adivasis-not-naxalites-are-target-…

https://www.sabrangindia.in/interview/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%…

We appeal to our readers to contact the authorities to ensure that the administration takes effective steps to ensure her safety.
Dantewada SP – 07856 – 252224; 9479194300
Dantewada DM – 07856-252455; 7587700111; 9479194313/07856 244437 –
Amit Kataria , Bastar collector, 094 25 580306
RN Dash, SP, Bastar, +91 94 79 194003
 

Statement of Solidarity with Students in JNU, India – by students in KU Leuven, Belgium

0

We, the undersigned, students in the social sciences and humanities programs at KU Leuven, strongly condemn the Indian state’s heavy handed and politically motivated action against the students at the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), Delhi.

We condemn the brutal police action against students, especially the arrest of JNU Students’ Union (JNUSU) president, Kanhaiya Kumar on 12 February 2016 – who has been charged under colonial-era sedition laws. We equally condemn the witch-hunt against and media trials against JNU, its faculty, and its students – especially Umar Khalid, an atheist-Leftist activist, who is wrongfully being called an ‘Islamist’ by some in the media.

Over the last few months, Indian universities have become a crucial site to contest and resist the arbitrary and concerted efforts of the Indian state to quash academic autonomy and dissent – from the scrapping of non-NET fellowships in 2015, to the death of Dalit PhD scholar Rohith Vemula at the Hyderabad Central University, earlier in January.

We underscore the fact that universities have historically been sites of critical thinking and politics, and need to remain the same. Furthermore, as the recent cases in India have shown, it is often students from under-privileged backgrounds who raise critical questions against the workings of the state, and also question structures of privilege within universities, in peaceful and non-violent ways.

The government and police action against the students at JNU seriously undermines and threatens these values. These (re)actions are based on questionable facts and charges of anti-nationalism and sedition. Indeed, no is within the space of the university that ideas of the ‘nation’ – who is included within it, and who is excluded – can be questioned and debated.

We join Kanhaiya Kumar and other Indian students in reaffirming the secular and liberal values of India’s Constitution, and the legacy of leaders like B.R. Ambedkar, and reject the hyper-national rhetoric that is running amok.
We stand by values of academic autonomy, freedom of expression and the right to dissent in a peaceful and non-violent manner, even as these are under siege in JNU.
We extend our support and solidarity to our fellow colleagues and peers in JNU and other Indian universities.
 18 February 2016
Proshant Chakraborty
Julio Ignacio Rodriguez
Alex Govers Lopez
Lore Janssens
Tena Lavrencic
Joanna Rychlicka
Tanima Chatterjee
Samarjit Mukherjee
Emma Carpenter
Christine Verbruggen
María Rodríguez
Veronique Joncas
Ilaria Monfroni
Anisa Loli
Livia Ferbinteanu
Sébastien Libert
Krishna S