Home Blog Page 2597

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS STANDS WITH JNU

0

We, the undersigned students, faculty, staff, and other members of the University of Illinois community are in solidarity with students, faculty and staff at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), India, against the ongoing anti-democratic actions by the Indian state. We demand an immediate end to the police action against students on campus, and withdrawal of all charges against Kanhaiya Kumar, President of the JNU Students’ Union. We unequivocally condemn the witch hunting of students, using archaic laws of sedition, who organized the cultural event questioning capital punishment and the deliberate vandalism and violence unleashed by those affiliated with Hindu Nationalist groups. We are also dismayed at the violence used by lawyers aligned with the government in their acts of vigilantism which are aimed at using the garb of patriotism to impose their ideology through violence.
We strongly believe that the charge of sedition against Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid and the other 6 students are based on spurious evidence. This arrest is an excuse for the state to root out dissenting voices on JNU campus, a move towards converting educational institutions like JNU into an arm of the authoritarian state. Attempts of a similar nature have been witnessed recently at other Indian educational institutions such as Film and Television Institute of India (FTII) and Hyderabad University. The growing threat to academic freedom and the practice of fundamental thinking and critique, posed by the current political climate is transnational, and extends beyond India to other parts of the world–it is a threat we face here in the United States, too.

For any word or action to qualify as being “seditious” under Indian law, it has to directly issue a call to violence in front of a gathered mob capable of such violence. This was not the nature of the protest held by a group of JNU students against the judiciary’s decision regarding Afzal Guru. His conviction and the subsequent hanging has been questioned repeatedly by legal scholars, jurors, lawyers, writers, and academics. The peaceful protest held on February 9 on campus was not unlike other protests convened at the university over the last several decades. Further, the sedition law the Indian state is using to target democratic students at JNU is a colonial-era law originally imposed by the British Empire to keep its subjects in line. Britain itself has since abolished sedition as a criminal offense.
Dissent is an essential part of a healthy democracy. We therefore strongly condemn the Indian government’s response to the students’ protests and demand that the state refrain from authoritarian behaviour. In this spirit, we urge the Vice Chancellor of JNU to protect members of the university community and safeguard their democratic rights. We also urge the Central Government to immediately withdraw any police investigation into the case and leave the matter to the autonomous bodies of Jawaharlal Nehru University.
 
Further signatures available at http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/university-of-illinois-stands-with-jnu-india
 
Signed, as of 14:00 GMT 19th Feb 2016 –
Tariq Khan, History
Utathya, History
Tariq Omar Ali
Natalie Nagel
Kristina Clarke-Khan
Umair Rasheed, CSAMES alumnus
Sunny Ture, Education
Muhammad Yousuf
Sara Feldman, Jewish Culture and Society
Brandon Hudspeth
Rajashekar Iyer
Raha Behnam
Deirdre Ruscitti Harshman
Kadeem Fuller
Harry Mickalide
Shwetha
Megan White, History
Mohammed Sheikh, Physics
Shikha Lakhanpal
Apoorv
Jyoti Aneja
Pronoy Rai
Padmaja
Aristotelis Panagiotopoulos
Peter Wright
Andrea Herrera
Alisha Elliott
Michelle Kenny
Marillia Correa Kuyumjian
Anustup Basu
Estibalitz Ezkerra
Rebecca Ginsburg
Richard Hamilton
Amita
Anil Bera
Aparajita Zutshi
Perla Torres
Sreoshi Banerjee
Prakrati
Mark Sanchez
Sharmila Ghosh
Elchin Gulaliyev
Stuart Levy
Dola B
Mousumi Mukherjee
Daniel Werst, UIUC Graduate
Jayadev Athreya, Adjunct Associate Professor of Mathematics
Meghan Bohardt
Bryan Parthum
 

STATEMENT OF SOLIDARITY WITH STUDENT ACTIVISTS IN INDIA: University of Pennsylvania & Philadelphia South Asian Collective

0

We, activists and academics in the Pennsylvania region, strongly condemn the attack on academic freedom at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi. The arrest of Kanhaiya Kumar, the President of the JNU Student’s Union, on charges of sedition has brought to light the intervention of the Union Government in the internal matters of the university. The repeated interference by police personnel at the behest of Vice Chancellors on university campuses is a draconian move. The charges against students were brought after an event organized by a section of students on campus premises to discuss the judicial execution of Afzal Guru. The JNU Students’ Union was subsequently held responsible for the “anti-national” slogans that were chanted by a group of students. We condemn these trumped-up and unconstitutional charges and stand in solidarity with the efforts to repeal capital punishment in India.

The events unfolding at JNU reveal disturbing similarities with instances of government repression on other campuses. We remember, with distress, the actions of the University of Hyderabad (UoH) administration in cahoots with the Central Government, actions that led to the death of a promising Ambedkarite student-activist, Rohith Vemula. The protests that arose indicted the discriminatory atmosphere prevailing in our universities as tantamount to the denial of the fundamental right to education to socially marginalized groups. Further, the murder of social thinkers like Govind Pansare and M.M. Kalburgi by hyper-nationalist elements under the tacit encouragement of the policies of the Central Government has shocked all advocates of free speech in India.

The charges of sedition against students participating in democratic discussion of public events is highly objectionable. The stifling of voices through intimidation and muscle power does not bode well for educational institutions.

Debate and dissent are integral parts of a strong democracy. Universities are critical public spaces that support these democratic practices to realize the values of social justice enshrined in the ideals of the constitution. International campuses like JNU, FTII and UoH bring together diverse group of students in the spirit of self-reflexive and deep intellectual engagement to ask fundamental questions of their social realities. An attack on these institutions is an attack on this precious pedagogical space. Student movements in India in alliance with other social movements in the country have historically been a resilient and sensitive force. The BJP government’s efforts to undermine them is nothing but an assault on Indian democracy. The government has failed to protect the rights of student bodies, and the highhandedness of the police highlights the insecurities of the present government.

In the United States during a presidential election year, we watch increasingly bigoted views against blacks, Muslims, and immigrants gaining ground. These events cannot be seen in isolation and we stand at the intersection of socio-political movements in the US and South Asia.
We stand in solidarity with students and faculty of JNU and demand the immediate release of the detained students. We appeal to all advocates for academic freedom in India and abroad to stand united against this state atrocity.

  1. Anannya Bohidar, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  2. Ammel Sharon, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  3. Meghna Chandra, Philadelphia South Asian Collective
  4. Ania Loomba, English, University of Pennsylvania
  5. Projit Mukharji, History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania
  6. Najnin Islam, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania

 

  1. Suvir Kaul, English, University of Pennsylvania
  2. Rallapalli Sundaram, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  3. Teren Sevea, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  4. Debjani Bhattacharyya, History, Drexel University
  5. Kasturi Sen, Lawyer for the Defender Association of Philadelphia and Philadelphia South Asian Collective.
  6. Toorjo Ghose, Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania
  7. Ishani Dasgupta, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  8. Shampa Chatterjee, Medical School, University of Pennsylvania
  9. Lucas de Lima, Graduate Student, Comparative Literature, University of Pennsylvania
  10. Sangeeta Banerji, Graduate Student, Geography, Rutgers University
  11. Sarita Mizin, Graduate Student, English, Lehigh University
  12. Aashish Gupta, Graduate Student, Demography, University of Pennsylvania
  13. Shourjya Deb, Graduate Student, Public Policy and Administration, Rutgers University
  14. Sugra Bibi, University of Pennsylvania
  15. Samira Junaid, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  16. Nandita Chaturvedi, Graduate Student, Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania
  17. Muhammed Malik, with Philadelphia South Asia Collective
  18. Joshua Pien, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  19. Sirus Joseph Libeiro, Graduate Student, School of Design, University of Pennsylvania
  20. Sambuddha Chaudhuri, Graduate Student, School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania
  21. Tanushree Bhan, Graduate Student, Public Policy and Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston
  22. Pooja Nayak, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
  23. Kaushik Ramu, Graduate Student, Comparative Literature, University of Pennsylvania
  24. Darakhshan Khan, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  25. Timothy J. Loftus, Graduate Student, Religion, Temple University
  26. Mercedes Yanora, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  27. Faisal I Chaudhry, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  28. Sudev J Sheth, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  29. Brooke Stanley, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania
  30. Melissa E. Sanchez, English, University of Pennsylvania
  31. Hao Jun Tam, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania
  32. David Kazanjian, English, University of Pennsylvania
  33. Aaron Bartels-Swindells, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania
  34. Manjita Mukharji, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  35. Diksha Dhar, Graduate Student, Fulbright-Nehru Visiting Scholar (visiting), University of Pennsylvania.
  36. Faranak Miraftab, Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
  37. Timothy Lorndale, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
  38. Brittany Puller, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
  39. Philip Friedrich, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
  40. Dave Kussell, Undergraduate, Economic History, University of Pennsylvania.
  41. Jared Weinstein, Undergraduate, Math, University of Pennsylvania.
  42. Pushkar Sohoni, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
  43. Akshay Walia, Graduate Student, Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania.
  44. Lavanya Nott, Philadelphia South Asia Collective.
  45. Leopold Eisenlohr, Graduate Student, Chinese, University of Pennsylvania.
  46. Evelyn Soto, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  47. Johanna Greeson, Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania.
  48. Julia Chatterjee, Undergraduate, South Asia Studies, University in Pennsylvania.
  49. Josephine Park, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  50. Priti Narayan, Graduate Student, Geography, Rutgers University.
  51. Monidipa (Mimi) Mondal, Graduate Student, Creative Writing, Rutgers University.
  52. Baishakh Chakrabarti, Graduate Student, South Asia Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
  53. Chao Guo, Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania.
  54. Ram Cnaan, Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania.
  55. Femida Handy, Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania.
  56. Ezekiel Dixon-Roman, Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania.
  57. Andrea Doyle, Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania.
  58. Sheena Sood, Philadelphia South Asia Collective.
  59. Rovel Sequeira, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania
  60. Daniel Davies, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania
  61. David L. Eng, English, University of Pennsylvania
  62. Nancy J. Hirschmann, Political Science, University of Pennsylvania
  63. Kalyan Nadiminti, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania
  64. James English, Director, Penn Humanities Forum, University of Pennsylvania
  65. Micah Del Rosario, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania
  66. Chi-Ming Yang, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  67. Jean-Christophe Cloutier, English, University of Pennsylvania
  68. Andrew Lamas, Urban Studies, University of Pennsylvania
  69. Amy Kaplan, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  70. Jed Esty, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  71. Prachi Priyam, Philadelphia South Asia Collective.
  72. Michael Gamer, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  73. Timothy Corrigan, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  74. Paul Saint-Amour, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  75. Monika Bhagat-Kennedy, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania.
  76. Fatima Tassadiq, Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania
  77. Hariprasad Kowtha, Philadelphia South Asian Collective
  78. Rahul Mukherjee, Cinema Studies, University of Pennsylvania.
  79. Eram Alam, History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania.
  80. Jazmin Delgado, Graduate Student, English, University of Pennsylvania.

Letter of solidarity with JNU: Students, Staff and Faculty, Ashoka University

0

We, the undersigned—who study and work at Ashoka University, as well as the alumni of the Young India Fellowship, in our private capacity—write to voice our solidarity with the students and faculty at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). Recent events at JNU, including the arrest of the JNUSU President over the charge of sedition, as well as other disproportionate measures, amount to a deeply troubling attack on academic and cultural freedom. We strongly condemn the display of brute force by the police, who were given free entry to the campus, including hostels, to question, detain and arrest students and faculty members. We protest the lack of police protection to those students and faculty, and condemn the use of State force against democratic expressions of dissent.As proponents of liberal education, we believe that societies can only grow when they foster intellectual engagement with fundamental social questions and contemporary political issues through non-violent debate and argumentation. University campuses are, and should be, autonomous spaces where people can peacefully express as well as challenge dissent and opinions. However, the recent spate of events involving many university campuses across the country has posed a serious threat to the sanctity of such spaces as well as the democratic right to dissent and freedom of speech and expression. This includes the turn of events that led to Rohith Vemula’s death at the University of Hyderabad, the withholding of grants by the Ministry of Human Resource Development to Panjab University, and several instances of violent disruption of the screening of the film Muzaffarnagar Baaqi Hai in campuses across the country.

We condemn the State-backed misuse of the charge of sedition, a colonial era provision in the Indian Penal Code, against the JNUSU President, Kanhaiya Kumar. In the documented absence of any allegedly ‘anti-national’ actions or rhetoric on his part, we see the charge as an attempt to stifle dissent from the dominant order and silence critique of the State. We strongly believe that the provision against sedition, which was repealed in the United Kingdom itself in 2009, has no place in modern democracy. Most immediately, we strongly disapprove of the action of certain lawyers and a Member of the Legislative Assembly who physically attacked JNU students and faculty members as well as journalists outside the Patiala Court House premises on 15th February, 2016.

We fear that the continued State inaction against such instances of violence will foster an environment in which the label “anti-national” or “traitor” can be imposed on every voice of dissent.
We urge that:

– the JNU campus be restored to normalcy and the police be withdrawn from all parts of the campus.
– the JNUSU President, Kanhaiya Kumar be released from police custody immediately and all charges be dropped against him.
– such unconstitutional actions be denounced.
– we be allowed to nurture our universities as tolerant, democratic spaces where dissent and disagreement is respected, discussions are nurtured, and critical thinkers are born.
 

Faculty
Ajit MishraBhaskar DuttaMalvika Maheshwari
Alex WatsonDebarati RoyMandakini Dubey
Anisha SharmaDurba ChattarajMaya Saran
Anunaya ChaubeyGilles VerniersNayanjot Lahiri
Anuradha SahaGwendolyn KellyRajendran Narayanan
Aparajita DasguptaJonathan Gil HarrisRatna Menon
Aparna vaidikKranti SaranRavindran Sriramachandran
Arunava SinhaKunal JoshiSaikat Majumdar
Aruni KashyapM A Ahmad KhanSupriya Nayak
Pulapre BalakrishnanMadhavi MenonVaiju naravane
Bharat RamaswamiMalabika SarkarVishes Kothari
 
Staff
Adil ShahKanika SinghShiv D Sharma
Aniha BrarKarunaShreya Khedia
Anu SinghMeena S. WilsonSudarshana Chanda
Anuja KelkarMercia PrinceSuha Gangopadhyay
Charu SinghPriyanka KumarSukanya Banerjee
Chiranjit mahatoSarah AfrazSushmita Nath
Dr Maaz Bin BilalSaumya VarmaSwarnim Khare
Harshita TripathiSaurav GoswamiTanita Abraham
Ishan de SouzaSayan ChaudhuriZehra
Sushmita SamaddarSurya RamanSandeep Saraswal
Apoorva GuptaAditya SarinChandan Sharma
Alumni
Aafaque R KhanKaavya GuptaRishi Iyengar
AkankshaKande Sruthi NivedithaRitesh Agarwal
Akshay BarikKaustubh KhareRohini Singh
Ananta SethMaansi VermaRupali Kapoor
Antony Arul ValanMalini BoseSai Krishna Kumaraswamy
Anushka SiddiquiMayank SharmaSakshi Ghai
Ashish KumarMrudula NujellaShahzaib Ahmed
AshweethaNeil MaheshwariShaleen Wadhwana
Avni AhujaNeelakshi TewariShashank Mittal
Chaarvi BadaniNikita SaxenaShivangi Pareek
Danish Ahmad MirNina SudShrestha Mullick
Debanshu RoyNipun AroraShweta Subbaraman
Deepika GhoshParushyaSimeen Kaleem
Devleena ChatterjiPavithra SrinivasanSimranpreet Oberoi
Dhaneesh JamesonPoornima SardanaSonal Jain
Dhwani SabeshPragya MukherjeeSubhodeep Jash
Hardika DayalaniPrama NeerajaTanuj Bhojwani
Harsh Mani TripathiRahul SreekumarTaysir Moonim
Harsh SnehanshuRajat NayyarVaishnavi Viraj
Himanshu RanjanRatul ChowdhuryVenkat Prasath
Jahanara Rabia RazaRimjhim RoyVishal Khatri

Solidarity Statement of Students from Northeast India, TISS, Mumbai 20th February 2016

0

We, the undersigned, students and research students from various states of northeastern region of India studying in Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai would like to highlight on the unprecedented shrinkage of academic spaces across various universities in India. We condemn the politically motivated interferences of the state in Jawaharlal Nehru University and in Hyderabad Central University (HCU), and other universities. We also condemn the mob justice perpetrated by lawyers against students, journalist, activists etc in the Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, and media trial led by prominent journalists from New Delhi.

Additionally, we would like to counter the claim of Delhi Police on terming consumption of beef in the light of JNU incident as anti-national activity. Going by this yardstick, students coming from northeastern region who consume beef will not fit into the notion of nationalism defined by the Delhi Police.  This indicates that the discourse of nationalism in India has to become broader in scope so that it can engage and acknowledge concerns of people from marginalised sections. Reducing the current incident into the binaries of nationalism and anti-nationalism will isolate and exclude issues of tribal people, Dalits, Muslims etc. There is a need to distinguish between dissent and anti-national activity.

In this platform, we would also like to mention about the omission of Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) from the eligibility list in the online application form for National Fellowships for Higher Education for ST Students (NFST) where ST students pursuing MPhil/PhD from TISS were not able to apply for this fellowship. Meanwhile, similar UGC fellowships for SC and OBC students from TISS are still operational. Such step discourages and demotivates ST students who are mostly first generation students to take up higher studies in their pursuits for academic career. We seek intervention from the Centre and concerned authorities on this issue.

The patterns across various universities orchestrated by ABVP and right wing politics are disturbing. The recent incident of Rohith Vemula from HCU which has shaken the consciences of everyone is reflexive of everyday discriminations, and atrocities meted out to Dalits. The turn of events coming out from JNU has diminished the building up of momentum on seeking justice for Rohith Vemula. We sense larger politics at play from the ruling government on evading Rohith Vemula’s case, and of UGC non-net fellowship. In the interest of academic spaces and free thinking, and democratic values, we appeal for immediate release of Kanhaiya Kumar of JNU, reconsideration of charges against Umar Khalid of JNU and other students, and fulfilment of justice for Rohith Vemula. We extend our solidarity with JNU, HCU, IIT-M, FTII and other universities/institutes, and autonomy of universities, spaces for debate, discussion and dissent (including issues like AFSPA, developmental projects, and rights of indigenous people etc) should be upheld and protected.

  1. Richard Kamei
  2. Dominic Leo
  3. Apao Remai
  4. Philemon Shangne
  5. Roderick Wijunamai
  6. Albert Povah
  7. Zajano Yanthan
  8. Akash Basumatari
  9. Saurav
  10. Karabi
  11. Samar Rabha
  12. Zaza Kipgen
  13. Nemy Tombing
  14. Vaiphei
  15. Clearance Mawite
  16. Ashonshok
  17. Duan Kamei
  18. Verahu Therie
  19. Sonam Choden
  20. Benjamin Haokip
  21. Sinmi Rungsung
  22. Somingam Hungpung
  23. Domela

‘Defend People’s Constitutional Rights’: Left Front calls for a 3-day, all-India campaign

0


 
In a joint statement issued today, top leaders of six Left parties strongly condemned “the attack launched by the RSS-BJP against the Left and all other progressive forces” and gave a call for an all-India protest from February 23 to 25, “against the machinations of the Central government under RSS
guidance”.

“It is clear that under the false allegation of being ‘anti-national’ the RSS-BJP have mounted an all-India attack against the Indian people,” the statement added. It appealed to all progressive, left and secular forces to join the protest under the “Defend People’s Constitutional Rights” banner.

The Left parties demanded that the JNU Students Union president, Kanhaiya Kumar must be released and all cases of sedition filed against students must be withdrawn forthwith. “No harassment and witch hunting must be allowed. The truth has now come out that most of the evidence produced by the government was fabricated. Those who have fabricated the evidence and propagated it must be punished under the law,” said the statement.

The statement strongly condemned “the attack mounted by the RSS under the patronage of this BJP-led NDA government” against the Jawaharlal Nehru University stating that this was part of “a larger design by the communal forces to carry forward their agenda in institutions of higher learning”. This systemic pattern, it stated, was clearly visible in the incidents in Film & Television Institute of India, Hyderabad Central University leading to the tragic suicide of Rohith Vemula, the incidents in IIT Chennai and now in Jadavpur University.

“It is clear that the RSS-BJP is mounting an open attack on the democratic and constitutional rights of the people. Further, such attacks are part of the efforts to sharpen communal polarisation in the country to also divert the attention of the people from the growing burdens being imposed upon them by the total failure of this NDA-led Modi government on all fronts”, the statement added.

The joint statement was issued today following a meeting in Delhi. It was attended by Sitaram Yechury, Prakash Karat and S Ramachandran Pillai [CPI(M)], Sudhakar Reddy, Gurudas Dasgupta and D Raja [CPI], Swapan Mukherjee [CPI(ML)-Liberation], Abani Roy [RSP], Pran Sharma [SUCI(C)] and Debabrata Biswas [AIFB].
 

Open letter: Over 100 Mumbai lawyers condemn ‘tyranny’ of fellow-lawyers at Patiala court

0


 
We, the undersigned lawyers practicing in Mumbai, condemn the undignified behavior of our professional colleagues in the Patiala House Court Complex, Delhi during this week. As members of the legal fraternity we are ashamed of their conduct which is neither becoming of the dignity of the profession nor as citizens of a free and democratic country. This is nothing but tyranny and mockery of a system we took an oath to practice in.

We practice in a system that recognizes freedom of speech and expression and a right to be represented before a court. As officers of the court and upholders of law it is not becoming of us lawyers to engage or indulge in such acts of assaulting, beating up and intimidating people within or outside the Court premises.  The conduct of assaulting any citizen of the country is not only taking law into our hands but proclaiming that we have no faith in justice and the very legal system we practice in.

Freedom of speech and expression is the very foundation of our practice and if these very rights and freedoms are curtailed it threatens the edifice of our profession.

A fundamental principle of law is that everyone is innocent till proven guilty and by such unbecoming conduct we are declaring the entire process of law infructuous. If guilt were to be decided outside the court, through popular sentiment the entire judicial process would be rendered meaningless. We as practitioners of law must desist from such conduct and uphold the dignity of the profession.

We write this open letter with the hope, that our fellow lawyers will respect and uphold the dignity of our profession.

  1. Anil Anturkar, Sr. Counsel
  2. Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Counsel
  3. Dinyar Madon, Sr. Counsel
  4. E. P Bharucha, Sr. Counsel
  5. Gayatri Singh, Sr. Counsel
  6. Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Counsel
  7. Mihir Desai, Sr. Counsel
  8. Milind Sathe, Sr. Counsel
  9. Navroz Seervai, Sr. Counsel
  10. Rahul Narichania, Sr. Counsel
  11. Rajani Iyer, Sr. Counsel
  12. Ravi Kadam, Sr. Counsel
  13. Sanjay Singhvi, Sr. Counsel
  14. Shirish Gupte, Sr. Counsel
  15. Shyam Mehta, Sr. Counsel
  16. Venkatesh Dhond, Sr. Counsel
  17. Adv. Aabad Ponda
  18. Adv. Aayush Tainwala
  19. Adv. Abdul Bari Ansari
  20. Adv. Abhilasha Sharma
  21. Adv. Abhinav Tiwari
  22. Adv. Aditya Swarup
  23. Adv. Afreen  Khan
  24. Adv. Anita Castellino
  25. Adv. Apeksha Parekh
  26. Adv. Archana Rupwate
  27. Adv. Arshad Shaikh
  28. Adv. Arun Ferrera
  29. Adv. Asadulla A Sayed
  30. Adv. Asha Rudiyal
  31. Adv. Ayaz Shaikh
  32. Adv. Bruno Castellino
  33. Adv. Butul A Sayed
  34. Adv. D. British
  35. Adv. Deepa Chhabria
  36. Adv. Farhana Latief
  37. Adv. Flavia Agnes
  38. Adv. Hemant B. Kumar
  39. Adv. Hemant Ingle
  40. Adv. Imtiyaz Shaikh
  41. Adv. Irene Sequeira
  42. Adv. Jalaja Nambiar
  43. Adv. Jaya Menon
  44. Adv. Kanika Joshi
  45. Adv. Karl Tamboli
  46. Adv. Kranti LC
  47. Adv. Lara Jesani
  48. Adv. Maharukh Adenwalla
  49. Adv. Maneck Mulla
  50. Adv. Mani Prakash
  51. Adv. Manoj M Kadam
  52. Adv. Medha Deo
  53. Adv. Meenaz Kakalia
  54. Adv. Mini Mathew
  55. Adv. Monica Sakhrani
  56. Adv. Mridula kadam
  57. Adv. Mussadique Shaikh
  58. Adv. Naushad Engineer
  59. Adv. Nausheen Yousuf
  60. Adv. Nikhil Sakhardande
  61. Adv. Nilima Dutta
  62. Adv. Nita Bhatia
  63. Adv. Persis Sidhva
  64. Adv. Pradeep mandhyan
  65. Adv. Prajakta Keni
  66. Adv. Pranali Pawar
  67. Adv. Priyank Kapadia
  68. Adv. Raju Moray
  69. Adv. Rebecca Gonsalves
  70. Adv. Riddhi Dadia
  71. Adv. Robin Fernandes
  72. Adv. Roshni Tandale
  73. Adv. S M Algaus
  74. Adv. Sangeena Aliyar
  75. Adv. Sanober Keshwaar
  76. Adv. Sarah Kapadia
  77. Adv. Sarosh Bharuch
  78. Adv. Saumya Brajmohan
  79. Adv. Scherezad Parelvala
  80. Adv. Shalini Devi
  81. Adv. Sharan Jagtiani
  82. Adv. Sharmila Kaushik
  83. Adv. Shonottra H. Kumar
  84. Adv. Shrey Fatterpekar
  85. Adv. Shreya Jha
  86. Adv. Shruti Jadhav 
  87. Adv. Shweta Moray
  88. Adv. Siddha Pamecha
  89. Adv. Somasekhar Sundaresan
  90. Adv. Sonal Waingankar
  91. Adv. Sumangala Biradar
  92. Adv. Sunil R Pandey
  93. Adv. Surabhi Singh
  94. Adv. Suraj Sanap
  95. Adv. Suresh Rajeshwar
  96. Adv. Susan Abraham
  97. Adv. Swaraj Jadhav
  98. Adv. T. Parakkadan
  99. Adv. Utkarsh Mishra
  100. Adv. Veena Gowda
  101. Adv. Veena Johari
  102. Adv. Vidhi Kotak
  103. Adv. Vijay Hiremath
  104. Adv. Vinamra Kopariha
  105. Adv. Yug Mohit Chaudhry
  106. Adv. Zaman Ali

 
 

An open letter to Zee News on #JNUCrackdown

0
ndtv-vs-times-now

February 19, 2016
Maitreyee Shukla

Dear Zee News,
Maybe you are aware that a new video has emerged. A video which proves that the clipping shown by Sudhir Chaudhary in his segment is not the entire truth. And as always, half truth turned out to be dangerous. Your channel has manipulated the video and made it appear as if Kanhaiya and Umar were raising slogans for the secession of Kashmir by asking for ‘Azaadi’ from India. Although, even then, these slogans were nowhere close to being seditious, however, some might have considered them objectionable or offensive. Now, after seeing what the complete slogans were, its plain as the nose on your face that the slogans raised by Kanhaiyya and Umar are not even remotely offensive. In other news, the government has denied any intelligence report on Umar being a JeM sympathizer, whom you have declared to be a terrorist in your recent segments.

By twisting their words, you have made two innocent students into ‘traitors’ in the eyes of the nation. This is not just an injustice to these two, but a grave injustice to the prestigious institution of JNU, the entire student and teachers community of JNU, and also the ‘nation’ whose integrity you claimed to be your supreme concern. The way you drove the entire nation into a frenzy of hatred towards the entire JNU community is condemnable. Your media trial of Kanhaiyya and Umar has fairly reduced their chances of getting a fair trial. This is not the “Hakeeqat jaisi, Khabar waisi” you claimed once. (Is this why you changed your punchline?) Frankly, it’s shitty journalism on your part.

You guys are an expert on whataboutery, so let me ask a few ‘what abouts’ to you. What about the time when JNU students were taking water cannons and lathis after long hunger strikes in freezing cold weather? Where were you? What about when JNU stood in solidarity with students of HCU in demand of justice for Rohith Vemula? Where were you?

In your attempt to malign my university, you used the death of the brave Lance Naik Hanuman Thappa. Now, know that JNU has since long supported the demand raised by Pakistan to declare Siachin as a ‘No War Zone’. It was your beloved government who did not listen and caused the death of these soldiers. Secondly, you raised the issue of the taxpayers’ money. Zee network, the taxpayers’ money is wasted when the government uses them to write off taxes of huge corporations, not when students organize themselves into political parties to discuss the issues of the country and attempt to solve them. In another segment you labelled us ‘anti-national’ because we celebrate Mahishasur Diwas instead of Durga pooja. Again, you gave half the truth. We celebrate Mahishasur Diwas ALONG with Durga Pooja. We do that because Mahishasur is a local deity for many tribes, just like Raavan, and we wish to give everyone equal space. And if as per you, Mahishasur is anti national, then your knowledge about the diversity of India is severely flawed.

After your false DNA test, here is an account of what we JNU students have faced, and you have been gracious enough to ignore.

1. Our beloved university defamed, to the extent that people demanded its shutdown.
2. Several innocent students targeted, including our leader, Kanhaiya Kumar.
3. Mob-o-cracy in world’s largest democracy. Several students and teachers manhandled.
4. Landlords in Munirka have asked us JNU students to vacate their premises.
5. Name calling and abuses on social media and as well as outside. (I have been called a ‘deshdrohi’ by my own brother.)
6. Problems in everyday tasks, such as transportation because no one is willing to help ‘anti-nationals’.
7. The threat of violence at every step. It is impossible to wear our JNU tee shirt in public without getting hateful looks.
8. Holdup of classes. And mind you, the taxpayer’s money is being wasted now, when we are not able to hold regular classes.
9. Our country is deriving worldwide criticism. Even Noam Chomsky has criticized the Indian government for its crackdown. By the way, now is the time when the nation is being defamed, not when scholars were protesting.
10. On a lighter note, we are wasting our time debating with cyber goondas and morons.

You have misused your extent of reach and have betrayed the trust of the entire nation, and for this you owe us an apology. Note that even now, I am not asking for #ShutDownZeeNews like you asked for #ShutDownJNU. I demand for a defamation case to be filed against you. But unlike you, Zee news, I want to give you the chance you never gave us, the chance to tell your side of the story. You are welcome to JNU’s beautiful campus and trust me, even though you have caused us immense pain and harassment, we will not mob you, or lynch you, we will hear you out and debate( A proper debate, not what your friend Arnab does).

If that sounds unbelievable to you, that is because you do not know JNU. JNU teaches us the value of free speech, the value of debate, dissent and fairness. JNU tells us to give a platform to everyone, even those who hate us. That is what we were doing on the evening of 9th when some fringe elements (who were probably not even from JNU) were provoked by the unconstitutional curbing of their free speech by the administration and some hooligans, and then, you, behaving even more immaturely than those idiots, went on a ‘destroy JNU’ rampage! Your coverage has been frenzied, biased and unethical by all standards of journalism.

In the end, I just have one message for you. Please consider when you have time to think between your extortion and biased journalism. Calm. The. Hell. Down.

Love,
A disappointed JNU student.

Attacking the Defenders of Freedom, Chhatisgarh: Lawyers and Journos being Forced Out

0

 
 

Days after Scroll contributor Malini Subramaniam at Bastar in Chattisgarh came under pressure from local groups and the police following to her reportage on police atrocities, Isha Khandewal, the lawyer representing Malini and a member of legal aid group JagLAG, has said they are being forced to leave Jagdalpur. JagLAG (Jagdalpur Legal Aid group), a non-profit that has been providing free aid to tribal communities in south Chhattisgarh’s five Naxal-affected districts, chose to legally represent Malini Subramaniam following a physical assault on her property in Bastar on February 8.

Malini Subramaniam, a journalist writing for scroll.in has been served an eviction notice by her landlord while her husband Ashim is still being held inside the police station and not let out. The landlord of the Jagdalpur Legal Aid group, who’s arms have been twisted by the local police by seizing his sole vehicle that is a means of livelihood, may also have to give in to the pressure. The message is clear. Freedom of Association, Movement and Expression are being openly throttled in the Bastar region, yet again. The state government is the same that controls the reigns at the Centre. The Chhatisgarh government wants the Jagdalpur legal aid group, an intrepid group of women lawyers who have been working in the Bastar region for three years, ensuring some legal rights for the Adivasis, out.
 
Sabrangindia has been consistently carrying reports of the resistance by Adivasis and the repression in Chhatisgarh. Here we reproduce a public appeal made by the Jagdalpur Legal Aid Group, a few minutes before the midnight hour on February 18-19, 2016.
 
 Things are taking an ugly turn in Jagdalpur.  
 
  First there were whispered threats, 'Don't go to Bijapur, the police will arrest you if you go there again'. Then, there was a whole week of public lynching of JagLAG as defenders of "blood-thirstly Naxalites" by the Samajik Ekta Manch, a vigilante group formed by the police.  At the same time, the local Bar Association again renewed their campaign to stop our practice by harassing the local lawyers standing with us.
 
Then, late last night, police visited our landlord – who is a driver by profession, and took him away to the police station. He was kept there till wee hours of this morning, and dropped back in a police vehicle; his car having been impounded.  Our badly shaken landlord informed us at 2:00 am this morning that he has no option but to ask us to vacate our house and office within a week.
 
Things have been rocky for us in Jagdalpur for a while now.  For a year and a half now, we are being hounded out by the local police.  From giving thinly veiled threats at press conferences that the police are closely monitoring NGOs providing "legal aid to Naxalites", to informing our clients that the police are about to arrest us for our Naxalite activities, to claiming before visiting journalists and researchers that we are merely a "Naxalite front", various officials of the police have been out to get us.
 
We have had police diligently investigating "anonymous" complaints that we are "fraudulent" lawyers.  For which, we had to make multiple trips to the police station with all our impeccable certificates and sound credentials. Then the local Bar Association, clearly prompted by the police, took out a resolution prohibiting our practice in the local courts. We countered this by challenging this resolution in the State Bar Council and obtaining an interim order allowing our practice. Unable to get at us any other way, now, the police are resorting to pressuring our landlord and his family.
 
The timing of these events does not escape our notice. This is coming at a time when the whole countryside of Bastar is on fire. Under the guise of anti-Naxal operations, the security forces are indulging in rape, pillage and plunder. With teams of women activists, we have documented at least three cases of mass sexual violence in the past three months itself, where security forces have run amok in the villages, stripping women, playing with their naked bodies and indulging in gangrape, looting their precious food supplies, and destroying their homes and granaries. The number of so-called "encounters" is at an all-time high, people are simply "disappearing" from villages in large numbers, only to show up in the list of "surrendered" or "arrested" Naxalites several days or weeks later. The local police and administration are talking in one voice of "clearing" the area within one year.
 
In this scenario, all who are challenging the official narrative, are being silenced. Social mobilizations are being orchestrated by the police to provide a cover to their illegal harassment of journalists, lawyers, activists. When mass gangrapes in Bijapur were being uncovered, a group calling itself the "Naxal peedit Sangharsh samiti" under the leadership of the ex-Salwa Judum leader Madhukar Rao, took out noisy belligerent rallies against Soni Sori, Bela Bhatia and "outside NGOs", threatening all of us with physical violence if we entered Bijapur again. When Malini Subramaniam wrote about the fake surrenders of Maoists, or the fake encounters, a motley group led by the nephew of the local MLA, calling themselves the "Samajik Ekta Manch" launched a vilification campaign against her. 

When we tried to get her complaint of stones thrown into her house registered, the Manch publicly declared us as their next target, for defending "khoonkhar Naxalites" ( खूंखार नक्सली – dreaded naxalites) and going to villages inciting people against the state.(राज्य सत्ता के खिलाफ भड़काते हैं).The local Bar Association also renewed their fatwa against local lawyers working with us..
 
Unable to stop us from continuing our work here, the police have now resorted to threatening others associated with us.  Prachi, the young household help working at Malini's, was summoned to the police station twice yesterday for interrogation, and kept there for hours.  Despite the clear letter of the law that women witnesses can only be examined at their place of residence, she was taken away to the police station late at night for questioning, much to the alarm of her family. She has been taken to the police station again this morning and is still there.  Malini's landlord,who lives in Raipur, was also summoned to the thana this morning, and by now has also issued an eviction notice to her.  Malini's husband, Ashim, who was called inside the thana in the afternoon, is also now being held inside and not being allowed outside.

Our landlord, a person of very modest means, is also a member of the minority community, and vulnerable in this climate of pervasive fear.  Our landlord's family have always had the greatest love and concern for us, which we return in equal measure.  We understand that they had no choice this time but to ask us to vacate. We also understand that it would be exceedingly difficult to find another rental place in this time of inflamed passions and provoked agitations.  We are still trying. 
 
 We take solace in the despair apparent in the highest echelons of police, who have had to stoop to such crude levels of indecency to throw us out of Jagdalpur. 

  Shalini Gera and Isha Khandelwal have issued this statement.