Home Blog Page 2678

Sarkari haj is no cheaper

0

An estimated 1,20,000 Indian Muslims went on haj pilgrimage this year. Of this total, travel arrangements for 72,000 pilgrims were made by the Haj Committee – constituted under the Act of Parliament No. 51 of 1959 –, while the remaining opted for private travel agencies — well over a hundred private travel agencies offer haj tour packages. The government of India’s airfare subsidy is available only for hajis travelling through the Haj Committee. Incidentally, every haji who travels through the Haj Committee gets the benefit of highly subsidised airfare, no matter how rich he or she might be.
The major expenses involved in haj pilgrimage include airfare, food and accommodation in Mecca and Medina, compulsory dues payable to Saudi authorities and local travel in Saudi Arabia. The haj committee offers three different packages (Category I, II and III) depending on the type of accomodation a haji chooses — the nearer the accomodation is to Kaaba, the higher the accomodation charges.
Private travel agencies, too, offer 3–4 different packages along similar criteria.
The Mumbai–based Atlas Travel is one of the major haj tour operators in the country. Afzal Patel, the proprietor of Atlas Travel) told CC that for the recently completed haj, Atlas Travel offered a package tour costing Rs.85,000 (category I, the most expensive) and Rs.67,500 (category IV, the cheapest). Another, Asian Tours & Travels, offered an even cheaper package — from Rs.64,000 for the tourist class (cheapest) to Rs.88,000 for the super deluxe class. The packages are for a 40–42 days tour.
In comparison, the expenses incurred for the year 2001 by pilgrims traveling via the Haj Committee were Rs.82,295 for category I and Rs.72,143 for category III. In addition to this, the government paid Rs.20,000 per haji towards airfare. Taken together, the Haj Committee’s package for the pilgrims amounts to Rs.1,02,295 for category I and Rs.92,143).
Why then should an aspiring haji (category III package) pay Rs.72,143 in all to the Haj Committee and be obligated to the government of India for an additional Rs.20,000 when he need pay only Rs.64,000 (Rs.8,143 less) to Atlas Travel and not be obligated to the government of India even to the extent of a single rupee? Specially, considering that in the views of the ulema of Saudi Arabia, of the judiciary from the Islamic state of Pakistan and a very large section of Indian Muslims (ulema, scholars and intellectuals included), a sarkar subsidised haj may not be acceptable to Allah? 
From the individual haji’s point of view, travelling through the Haj Committee has its side benefit because of the different nature of the packages offered by the Haj Committee and private tour operators. Like other tour packages, private travel agencies for haj, too, offer an all expenses covered point–to–point service. So, all that a haji opting for a private travel agency has to do is to report at an Indian airport on the scheduled departure time. From then until his return flight lands in India, everything — airfare, accommodation, food, compulsory dues to Saudi authorities, local travel is taken care of by the travel agency. 
The Haj Committee package, on the other hand, works differently. This is how the break–up of Rs. 72,143 (cheapest package) worked out in the current haj season:
Out of the total amount, Rs.12,000 was deducted by the Haj Committee towards the subsidised airfare and Rs.500 towards service charges. The balance Rs.59,643 went towards purchase of foreign exchange worth 4,700 Saudi riyals (@ Rs.12.69 for one SRL). From this, the Haj Committee held back SRL 1,059 towards dues to be paid to Saudi authorities, SRL 1,200 for accommodation in Mecca and SRL 200 for accommodation in Medina. The balance amount of SRL 2,241 is handed back to the individual pilgrim. Out of this he has to spend SRL 300 for the sacrificial animal during Haj, leaving him or her with SRL 1,921 to pay for two–way Mecca–Medina travel and food expenses for around 40 days. Eating out, according to those who have been to Saudi Arabia, is quite cheap but most hajis from the lower income categories prefer to cook their own food which cuts costs even further. Because of this and depending on how long the haji stays in Saudi Arabia, at the end of the haj, he or she could be left with unused  Saudi riyals which could be used for shopping in Saudi Arabia or to bring back to India and reconvert to local currency. Those familiar with haj pilgrimage claim it is not difficult to save up to SRL 800-1,000 if one chooses to live very frugally while in Saudi Arabia. Converted back into Indian rupees on return means, a haji travelling through the Haj Committee can return to India with around Rs.10,000. 
Even when this amount is subtracted from the initial Rs. 72,143 paid to the Haj Committee, it means that the haji would effectively have paid Rs.62,143 to the Haj Committee as against the Rs.64,000 he would have paid to Asian Tours & Travels. In short, hardly any difference, not counting the fact that in case of opting for the privately organised tour, the haji has no worry whatsoever about the bother of purchases, cooking etc. for 40 days.
If the strongest argument for subsidised airfare rests on the ability of the poorer Muslims’ dream of haj, the above example shows up the fallacy of the argument. In short, this means that there is no rational argument whatsoever to support the claim for subsidy in case of the poorest amongst those going for (who in any case do manage to put together nothing short of Rs.60,000-70,000, no small amount by Indian standards). As for those who can pay the charges for more expensive packages, there is even less justification.       

Archived from Communalism Combat, March 2001 Year 8  No. 67, Cover Story 2

Why the subsidy

0

According to Syed Shahabuddin, the government policy of subsidy for haj pilgrims was  prompted by the steep rise in oil prices in the early ‘70s, leading to a big hike in travel fares across the board. The subsidy, Shahabuddin claims, was not in response to any Muslim plea or demand but the government’s own decision. The new policy was reportedly prompted specially in consideration of Muslims from the lower economic strata who traveled by ship. But since the airfare had also shot up steeply, the idea was mooted of a temporary subsidy for air travel,  to be phased out over a few years. Not only does the subsidy continue till date, but the subsidy amount, per haji and in terms of total cost to the exchequer, has risen steeply over the years.
Through the ‘70s and the ‘80s, shipping companies finding their business less and less economic, gradually moved out of the business. As a result, more and more hajis have had to travel by air. The year 1986 was the last year when a passenger ship took pilgrims for haj. 
In 1986-’87, Air India Chartered Ltd. charges for hajis were Rs.3,852, while the amount of government subsidy for the period is not available. With increasing airfare over the years, the amount the pilgrims paid for air travel (through the Haj Committee) was raised from year to year until 1992. But despite several hikes in IATA fare for international travel since then, the hajis’ share remains pegged at the same Rs.12,000 that was charged in 1992. 
According to a newspaper report which the CC has not been able to independently confirm, in 1992, the government paid Rs.2,000 to the airline as subsidy. This year, while the hajis still paid only Rs.12,000, the government’s subsidy per haji shot up to Rs.20,000. In other words, the subsidy for haj has spiralled from 16.7 per cent in 1992 to a whopping 62.5 per cent now. 
The Narasimha Rao government apparently saw this as one way of assuaging Muslim sentiments inflamed with the Congress government’s inaction during the demolition of the Babri Masjid and the countrywide riots that followed. Ironically, the two successive BJP-led governments, too, hiked the subsidy amount since 1998. The subsidy per haji this year was over Rs.900 more this year compared to last year. Not surprisingly, the Bajrang Dal and the VHP have accused a member of their own parivar — the BJP — of “Muslim appeasement”. 
Not one of the large number of Muslims CC spoke to could offer any justification for subsidy at least in the case of those who can afford to pay themselves. The question of increased subsidy, however, has to be differently understood. For example, presently, the normal return fare on regular flights is around Rs.36,000. This year Air India has been paid a little over Rs.32,000 per passenger — a discount of less than 15 per cent on its charter flights. On the other hand, after discount for bulk bookings, private tour agencies pay around Rs.24,000 only. Mohamed Amin Khandwani, chairman, Maharashtra Commission for Minorities, who was the Haj Committee chairman between 1983 and 1989, claims that during his tenure, Air India and Saudi Airlines, used to offer a 30 per cent discount. Syed Shahabuddin who is well-informed on the subject argues that even today the airlines should be able to profitably run charter flights for hajis even after offering 33 per cent discount. 
Were such a discount to be successfully negotiated, the airfare per passenger would work out to Rs.24,000 per passenger. In that case, the government of India would pay a subsidy of only Rs.12,000 per passenger, assuming that is should be subsiding haj in the first place.

Archived from Communalism Combat, March 2001 Year 8  No. 67, Cover Story 3

Ignored Warnings

0

Reports compiled by the Earthquake Affected Relief and Rehabilitation Services, Ahmedabad indicate that several warning signals that were reported by the media four months ago were ignored

The people of Gujarat, especially Kutch and Saurashtra, have been victim to a relent
 less cycle of natural disasters: two cyclones, in 1998 and 1999, coupled with two successive years of drought. The present earthquake was of unprecedented intensity and the tragedy has raised legitimate questions about the quality and efficacy of government response related to disaster management.  A significant aspect of disaster management relates to responses to warnings of imminent disasters. 

Reports compiled by the Earthquake Affected Relief and Rehabilitation Services (EARRS), Ahmedabad indicate that several such signals that even appeared in the media four months ago, were ignored

Reports from newspapers of Sept. 2000:

Major quake may follow Bhavnagar tremor: Expert 
(PTI) 18 Sept. 2000, The Times of India

MUMBAI: The large number of tremors being felt in Bhavnagar district of Gujarat “may be indications of a possible major earthquake”, according to an eminent geologist. The 11 tremors in five hours on September 12 could be foreshocks which normally precede a major earthquake just as it happened in Killari in Maharashtra on September 30, 1993, said Dr V Subramanyan while delivering a lecture on “Seismic scenario around Mumbai” at the Indian Institute of Geo–magnetism here during the weekend. 

Bhavnagar is geologically identical to Mumbai and both fall under earthquake zone III where quakes of magnitude up to 6.5 were possible, he said. 
The district lies along the Gulf of Khambat which is near Narmada faults, well near Satranj river basin. Subramanyan, currently project advisor of department of earth sciences in IIT Mumbai, said normally the faults, lying quiet for some time, get reactivated suddenly and act as the route for the release of stored pressures. 

Appreciating the Gujarat government’s effort at assessing the strength of the existing buildings and planning to adopt appropriate building technology, he said such studies should be done systematically for posterity since “we have to live with the earthquakes”. Scientific studies have helped to demarcate possible seismic zones through integrated geological and geophysical investigations, he said, adding, “the only thing which can be attempted in seismic zones is to go in for appropriate construction using the right designs for different types of buildings, warehouses, power reactors and dams”. Talking about prediction and prevention of earthquakes, Subramanyan said the scientific community was still not in a position to predict earthquakes. 

“It is because there are many factors we do not know, like the depths where the pressures build up, for how long they accumulate before getting relieved through earthquakes and where the pressure is built”. 

Earthquakes are brought about by the sudden release of pressures that have been accumulating for a long time inside the earth just like a pressure cooker, he said. Rocks are strong to withstand such pressures for quite some time, but when the accumulating stress exceeds ultimate bearing capacity, then they break by developing “fault” planes — which are actually cracks through which the accumulated pressure is released suddenly generating an earthquake which normally does not last longer than 15 seconds. 

Killer quake feared in Gujarat district 
Thursday 14 September 2000, The Times of India
GANDHINAGAR: Three more mild tremors kept people awake all night in Bhavnagar district as the government prepared on Wednesday to meet any emergency situation in the coastal region sitting on a seismically active faultline. More than 30 mild tremors have been felt in Saurashtra in recent days, raising fears of a major geological activity that could cause death and destruction. 

Experts warned that a ‘’killer earthquake’’ could strike the region anytime as the Bhavnagar–Kodinar faultline seems to have ‘re–activated’. The latest tremors were experienced at around 11.15 pm on Tuesday, and 2.24 am and 6 am on Wednesday. The region was shaken nearly a dozen times on Tuesday.

More than 30 mild tremors have been felt in Saurashtra in recent days, raising fears of a major geological activity that could cause death and destruction.Experts warned that a ‘’killer earthquake’’ could strike the region anytime as the Bhavnagar–Kodinar faultline seems to have ‘re–activated’.
— The Times of India, September 14 , 2000

Three hundred families had been shifted to safer places. Chief minister Keshubhai Patel, in Bhavnagar campaigning for the September 17 civic elections, urged the Centre to rush a team of meteorologists and seismologists to study the phenomenon. Patel also held high–level review meetings of officials here on Wednesday. The state government has sanctioned Rs 50 lakh as contingency relief fund and despatched medical and engineering teams to Bhavnagar. (UNI)
 
Quiet Bhavnagar tremor raises quite a storm: Geologists to study connection with earth-quakes in Turkey, Taiwan
Discussion forum on Local Economy & Politics, 23rd September, 2000 
A team of geologists from Dehradun, Pune and Vadodara will look into whether the tremors felt in Bhavnagar on Tuesday were anyway related to the devastating earthquakes in Turkey and Taiwan. 

On the other hand, principal advisor to the chief minister, PK Lehari, said on Wednesday in Gandhinagar that there was no link between the earthquake that occurred in Taiwan and tremors felt in the Bhavnagar district of the state. Mr Lehari said that Bharuch and not Bhavnagar fall in the earthquake zone. 

Bhavnagar experienced slight tremors on Tuesday afternoon at 12.55 pm in an area of 80 sq km reaching up to Bhal Bhatta area in Alang. The tremors in Bhavnagar on Tuesday followed a severe earthquake in Taiwan where more than a thousand people died. Coincidentally, the earthquake in Turkey about one–and–a–half months back was also followed by tremors in the Bhavnagar city. 

Experts from Dehradun, Pune and Vadodra will also locate the epicentre of eruption in case the city faces a serious threat of earthquake. According to experts in the seismographic research department of the state, an earthquake is generally followed by slight tremors. No official records were taken one–and–a–half months back when the city experienced similar tremors following the Turkey earthquake. 

Gujarat Engineering Research Institute at Vadodara has also been contacted in this connection. According to the Maritime Board of Alang, the intensity of the tremors was greater at the ocean surface and near seashore areas. Similarly, in Bhavnagar, intensity of the tremors was less in rural areas, as a result of which residents have started shifting to villages. 

However, the Bhavnagar district collector, Mr Rajkumar, who was in Gandhinagar on Tuesday, said normal life was unaffected and also no loss of property was reported. 

Archived from Communalism Combat, February 2001 Year 8  No. 66, Cover Story 2