“We, therefore, request the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay to convey our request to all the learned Judges exercising the criminal jurisdiction to decide the matter pertaining to bail/anticipatory bail as expeditiously as possible.”, the Supreme Court Bench Comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Sandeep Mehta said.
In this case, on which an order was passed on February 26, Monday, the accused, had been in custody for over seven years, and had preferred a bail application before the Bombay High Court. However, the Bombay High Court without hearing the application on merit has asked the applicant to approach the trial court to seek bail.
Challenging the decision of the High Court, the accused had filed a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court, citing a previous order dated 29.01.2024, the Supreme Court expressed concern over the non-exercise of jurisdiction vested in the High Court to decide the bail application on merits. The Supreme Court thereafter restored the case with the High Court while setting aside the impugned order. Besides, it also requested the High Court to decide the matter on merits within two weeks.
Although the Bombay High Court had granted bail to the accused-appellant on merits in compliance with the Supreme Court’s order, in January 2024, the Supreme Court still noted that “We have also come across numerous matters wherein the learned Judges are not deciding the matter on merits but find an excuse to shunt the case on different grounds.”
“We have come across various matters from the High Court of Bombay where the bail/anticipatory bail applications are not being decided expeditiously. We have also come across one matter SLP Crl….@ Diary No.1540/2024 (Ashok Balwant Patil v. Mohan Madhukar Patil and Ors), wherein the application for anticipatory bail was not decided for a period of more than four years.”, the Supreme Court stated.
The Supreme Court further observed that the non-deciding of bail application expeditiously deprives the accused of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.
“Needless to state that Article 21 of the Constitution of India is the soul of the Constitution as the liberty of a citizen is of paramount importance. Not deciding the matter pertaining to liberty of a citizen expeditiously and shunting away the matter on one or the other ground would deprive the party of their precious right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.”
The Supreme Court directed its Registrar (Judicial) to communicate this order to the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court, who shall place the same before the Chief Justice of High Court of Bombay.
The Order of the Supreme Court may be read here:
Related:
Bail For Kashmiri Journalists: What Does It Mean For Freedom Of Expression?
Unjust detention: Gautam Navlakha’s bail victory highlights insufficient evidence