Email: sabrangind@gmail.com
Disclosure and transparency from the RSS may finally expose decades-old ambiguities
The author, a historian and keen documentalist of the far right argues that if the RSS is compelled into legal transparency and accountability, murky details from the past could well tumble out of its century old existence
Allahabad HC dismissed plea to offer namaz at disputed Ayodhya site
Justices DK Arora and Alok Mathur of the Lucknow...
Bulandshahar incident: Former civil servants demand resignation of UP CM Adityanath
Sabrang -
We are a group of retired civil servants from...
Court orders FIR against activist who accused Adityanath of hate speech
The court ordered an FIR against activist Parvez Parvaz,...
Bulandshahr violence: Four Muslim men arrested for cow slaughter found innocent, Yogesh Raj still absconding
They were released after the SIT constituted to probe...
Jharkhand Court Convicts 8 in Latehar Lynching Case
In a body blow to mobocracy and cow vigilantism,...
Opinion: When a Hindu got caught in the Bulandshahr cow slaughter crossfire
Beginning with Mohammad Akhlaq, whose mob lynching left the...
Mohsin Sheikh Lynching: Father dies waiting for Justice
In a cruel twist of fate, Mohammed Sadiq Sheikh,...
1984: A Dark Chapter in Indian History
As the Delhi High Court sentences Congress leader Sajjan...
Justice delayed but not denied: Sajjan Kumar gets life term in 1984 riots case
The Delhi High Court has held Congress leader and...
Bulandshahr Mayhem Reveals a new Nationalist Pecking Order
If the politics of the Narendra Modi tenure in...
Trending
Related VIDEOS
ALL STORIES
ALL STORIES
Farm and Forest
A test for the Forest Rights Act in Assam
Eviction notices issued to four Taungya villages in Nagaon district have reignited questions about historical injustice, forest governance and the state's obligation to recognise forest rights before displacement
Culture
Delhi: Between Protection & Prayer: Stories of revered sites now under the protection of ASI
In Delhi, some monuments are not just remnants of the past. They continue to function as places of prayer, remain part of neighbourhood life, and exist within an ongoing struggle over who owns them, who maintains them, and who decides how they may be used. The authors examine the layered complexities involved
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi
Three decades after the PoA Act, justice remains elusive
A comprehensive 30-year review of the SC/ST Atrocities Act reveals a persistent gap between the law's transformative promise and the lived realities of Dalits and Adivasis confronting violence, discrimination, and impunity
Rule of Law
The Supreme Court in 2025: Deference, technicality and the retreat from rights
From citizenship and reservation to encounter accountability, privacy, environmental protection and minority rights, the Court's most contentious judgments of 2025 reveal an increasing preference for institutional deference and procedural compliance over substantive constitutional justice
Rights
Who owns Mumbai’s streets? The Bombay High Court, street vendors and a decade of regulatory failure
What began as a case about encroachments has become a searching inquiry into the State's failure to implement the Street Vendors Act, the rights of pedestrians and informal workers, and the growing role of identification and verification in urban governance
India
Defectors & Democracy: A critique of the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution
The right of voters to recall representatives who defect—as seen in West Bengal, Maharashtra, Goa and Arunachal Pradesh—and the requirement of intra-party democracy could form part of a broader institutional redesign. Such measures would deepen democratic values and, above all, signal a refusal by citizens to accept the corruption of their mandate. These may be among the reforms that India's Parliament and democracy most urgently need
Gender and Sexuality
A regressive 2026 amendment to rights of Trans persons is under legal challenge even as pride month is celebrated
Unable to stay the statute, High Courts have charted a middle path—protecting petitioners already undergoing hormone therapy while the broader constitutional challenge awaits adjudication by the Supreme Court
