Email: sabrangind@gmail.com
Despite ASI’s warning protesters in Bharuch march to collector to ‘preserve original identity’ of Bharuch mosque
The foot march happened just days after the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI), which protects the mosque, wrote to the district administration to not allow any “large gathering” on June 10
Persistent in their Struggle for Justice, Gulberg Massacre Survivors Challenge Sessions Verdict: Gujarat 2002
After a grueling exercise of over seven months, Survivors...
Bohra women want an end to the practice of “female genital cutting”: Sahiyo report
On the occasion of the International Zero Tolerance Day...
Hefazat-e-Islam, Bangladesh: Remove ‘un-Islamic’ Greek idol from Supreme Court
Sabrang -
Radical Islamist platform Hefazat-e-Islam has threatened to launch a...
What Does it Mean to be Inclusive?
Inclusiveness has taken many forms in India, but now...
Life in limbo: the Rohingya refugees trapped between Myanmar and Bangladesh
Violence against the Rohingyas, an ethnic Muslim minority in...
BJP ने फिर अलापा राम मंदिर राग, कटियार बोले- जैसे मस्जिद गिराई वैसे ही मंदिर बनाएगी ये सरकार
Sabrang -
उत्तर प्रदेश में विधानसभा चुनाव के नजदीक आते ही...
“Communalisation” of Indian history around Padmavati, a fictitious character, has colonial roots: Irfan Habib
Sabrang -
Strongly intervening in the “violent controversy" raging around the...
Why sectarianism fails at explaining the conflict in Syria
While sectarianism may be a component, its role as...
Bangladesh’s Shahbagh Moment: Fourth Anniversary
A flash back of the movement that at the...
Trending
Related VIDEOS
ALL STORIES
ALL STORIES
Farm and Forest
A test for the Forest Rights Act in Assam
Eviction notices issued to four Taungya villages in Nagaon district have reignited questions about historical injustice, forest governance and the state's obligation to recognise forest rights before displacement
Culture
Delhi: Between Protection & Prayer: Stories of revered sites now under the protection of ASI
In Delhi, some monuments are not just remnants of the past. They continue to function as places of prayer, remain part of neighbourhood life, and exist within an ongoing struggle over who owns them, who maintains them, and who decides how they may be used. The authors examine the layered complexities involved
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi
Three decades after the PoA Act, justice remains elusive
A comprehensive 30-year review of the SC/ST Atrocities Act reveals a persistent gap between the law's transformative promise and the lived realities of Dalits and Adivasis confronting violence, discrimination, and impunity
Rule of Law
The Supreme Court in 2025: Deference, technicality and the retreat from rights
From citizenship and reservation to encounter accountability, privacy, environmental protection and minority rights, the Court's most contentious judgments of 2025 reveal an increasing preference for institutional deference and procedural compliance over substantive constitutional justice
Rights
Who owns Mumbai’s streets? The Bombay High Court, street vendors and a decade of regulatory failure
What began as a case about encroachments has become a searching inquiry into the State's failure to implement the Street Vendors Act, the rights of pedestrians and informal workers, and the growing role of identification and verification in urban governance
India
Defectors & Democracy: A critique of the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution
The right of voters to recall representatives who defect—as seen in West Bengal, Maharashtra, Goa and Arunachal Pradesh—and the requirement of intra-party democracy could form part of a broader institutional redesign. Such measures would deepen democratic values and, above all, signal a refusal by citizens to accept the corruption of their mandate. These may be among the reforms that India's Parliament and democracy most urgently need
Gender and Sexuality
A regressive 2026 amendment to rights of Trans persons is under legal challenge even as pride month is celebrated
Unable to stay the statute, High Courts have charted a middle path—protecting petitioners already undergoing hormone therapy while the broader constitutional challenge awaits adjudication by the Supreme Court
