Email: sabrangind@gmail.com
CJP flags ‘communal polarisation campaign’ in Bengal polls, seeks action against BJP leaders over election speeches
CJP has filed two separate complaints before election authorities and police in West Bengal, alleging that speeches by Union Minister Sukanta Majumdar and BJP candidate Jagannath Chattopadhyay sought to polarise voters through religious appeals, anti-minority rhetoric, and fear-based narratives, thereby violating the Model Code of Conduct, electoral laws, and constitutional principles
CJP Team -
RSS: The anti-Constitutional “power centre” of the Modi Sarkar
This article was written between the two elections to...
The Latest Victims of “Cultural Terrorism”: A Dalit Poet and a Dalit Scholar
Sangh parivar’s cultural vigilantes force exit of Dalit poet...
We are living in times where everybody is scared: Magsaysay winner TM Krishna
Sabrang -
Magasaysay winner TM Krishna today said there was a...
American embrace of Trump made me realise how wrong I was about Modi
Now we know what it is to be in...
M.F. Husain’s Brush with the Ramlila: In His Own Words
With the dominant public mood of the country, carefully...
If Islam Means Peace, How Did So Many of its Revered Ulema Preach Hatred and Violence?
Issuing fatwas against terrorism are of little use. To...
PM मोदी ने सर्जिकल स्ट्राइक की ओर इशारा करते हुए इस विजय दशमी को बताया खास
Photo Credit: The Hindu; Shaquib Ahmed Khan has been making...
मदरसों और आतंकवाद पर भड़काऊ भाषण के आरोप में वंजारा के खिलाफ शिकायत
गोधरा में एक सप्ताह पहले भड़काऊ और नफरत भरा...
Radhika Vemula Rejects MHRD Report, Calls it a Conspiracy to Dilute Atrocities Case
The Roopanwal Commission report is a whitewash and part...
What Sunkanna’s Resistance Means: Dalit Scholar Refuses to Accept His PhD From Appa Rao
This Dalit scholar’s act is more than symbolic. It signifies...
Trending
Related VIDEOS
ALL STORIES
ALL STORIES
Caste
Thirty years on, justice remains elusive for Dalits in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Haryana
A chapter in a major 30-year review of the PoA Act argues that institutional failures, rather than legislative gaps, remain the biggest obstacle to justice
Politics
The telegram NEET case and the expansion of platform-level censorship in India
The Court's judgment marks a significant shift in Indian digital rights jurisprudence by accepting that the very design and architecture of a platform may justify extraordinary restrictions affecting millions of lawful users
India
From a daughter to her mother Indiramma, Kavitha Lankesh writes, “I will miss you. Everyday.”
By the morning of Monday, June 15, 2026, Indira Lankesh (Indiramma as we all knew her), mother of Kavitha and Gauri Lankesh, wife and partner of Parvathi Lankesh and grandmother to her beloved Esha, left peacefully in her sleep. She was 83 years old. Today, on the afternoon of Saturday June 20, about 1/1.30 p.m. her beautiful and loyal daughter, Kavitha Lankesh wrote this tribute to her on Meta/Facebook.
Farm and Forest
A test for the Forest Rights Act in Assam
Eviction notices issued to four Taungya villages in Nagaon district have reignited questions about historical injustice, forest governance and the state's obligation to recognise forest rights before displacement
Culture
Delhi: Between Protection & Prayer: Stories of revered sites now under the protection of ASI
In Delhi, some monuments are not just remnants of the past. They continue to function as places of prayer, remain part of neighbourhood life, and exist within an ongoing struggle over who owns them, who maintains them, and who decides how they may be used. The authors examine the layered complexities involved
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi
Three decades after the PoA Act, justice remains elusive
A comprehensive 30-year review of the SC/ST Atrocities Act reveals a persistent gap between the law's transformative promise and the lived realities of Dalits and Adivasis confronting violence, discrimination, and impunity
Rule of Law
The Supreme Court in 2025: Deference, technicality and the retreat from rights
From citizenship and reservation to encounter accountability, privacy, environmental protection and minority rights, the Court's most contentious judgments of 2025 reveal an increasing preference for institutional deference and procedural compliance over substantive constitutional justice
