Hate Speech

CJP flags ‘communal polarisation campaign’ in Bengal polls, seeks action against BJP leaders over election speeches

CJP has filed two separate complaints before election authorities and police in West Bengal, alleging that speeches by Union Minister Sukanta Majumdar and BJP candidate Jagannath Chattopadhyay sought to polarise voters through religious appeals, anti-minority rhetoric, and fear-based narratives, thereby violating the Model Code of Conduct, electoral laws, and constitutional principles

BJP minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat issues threat, is served EC notice

BJP leader Gajendra Singh Shekhawat, who is contesting the...

PUCL also urges EC to take action on Hate Speech

Following over 65 complaints from individuals and organisations, including ...

‘Muslims could be identified by removing their clothes’- Kerala BJP chief on Balakot Controversy

Attingal: Speaking at the campaign for the BJP’s Attingal...

Threats for votes continue unabated, Maneka Gandhi lands in another controversy

Says villages will be classified into ABCD as per...

To hell with the law: Sanjay Raut

Showing shocking disregard for the law of the land...

Breaking: EC bans Yogi for 3 days and Mayawati for 2 days from election campaigning

Finally there is action: the Election Commission, roundly criticised...

Vote for me or don’t come to me for jobs: Maneka Gandhi tells Muslims at UP rally

Union Minister Maneka Gandhi stoked a controversy by asking...

How Do We Ensure a Hate Free Election?

There is a very real fear that the 2019...

Ali vs Bajrang Bali, Yogi’s Divisive Politics Continues

Meerut: Known for his communal remarks, the Uttar Pradesh...

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

A test for the Forest Rights Act in Assam

Eviction notices issued to four Taungya villages in Nagaon district have reignited questions about historical injustice, forest governance and the state's obligation to recognise forest rights before displacement

Delhi: Between Protection & Prayer: Stories of revered sites now under the protection of ASI

In Delhi, some monuments are not just remnants of the past. They continue to function as places of prayer, remain part of neighbourhood life, and exist within an ongoing struggle over who owns them, who maintains them, and who decides how they may be used. The authors examine the layered complexities involved

Three decades after the PoA Act, justice remains elusive

A comprehensive 30-year review of the SC/ST Atrocities Act reveals a persistent gap between the law's transformative promise and the lived realities of Dalits and Adivasis confronting violence, discrimination, and impunity

The Supreme Court in 2025: Deference, technicality and the retreat from rights

From citizenship and reservation to encounter accountability, privacy, environmental protection and minority rights, the Court's most contentious judgments of 2025 reveal an increasing preference for institutional deference and procedural compliance over substantive constitutional justice

Who owns Mumbai’s streets? The Bombay High Court, street vendors and a decade of regulatory failure

What began as a case about encroachments has become a searching inquiry into the State's failure to implement the Street Vendors Act, the rights of pedestrians and informal workers, and the growing role of identification and verification in urban governance

Defectors & Democracy: A critique of the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution

The right of voters to recall representatives who defect—as seen in West Bengal, Maharashtra, Goa and Arunachal Pradesh—and the requirement of intra-party democracy could form part of a broader institutional redesign. Such measures would deepen democratic values and, above all, signal a refusal by citizens to accept the corruption of their mandate. These may be among the reforms that India's Parliament and democracy most urgently need

A regressive 2026 amendment to rights of Trans persons is under legal challenge even as pride month is celebrated

Unable to stay the statute, High Courts have charted a middle path—protecting petitioners already undergoing hormone therapy while the broader constitutional challenge awaits adjudication by the Supreme Court