Email: sabrangind@gmail.com
Punjab & Haryana High Court refuses anticipatory bail to journalist accused of provocative, communal statements against Purvanchal community
Justice Sumeet Goel cites prima facie digital evidence, seriousness of hate-motivated speech, and the need for custodial interrogation
India Today exposes Sanatan Sanstha’s terrorist activities
cjp -
In a shocking expose, the India Today news channel...
Communal Tension in Varanasi as Hindu Extremists allegedly attack Church
cjp -
FB of Pravik Kumar DubeyTension mounted in the holy...
Complainant in Hate Speech case against UP CM Adityanath held for Gang Rape
His SC plea challenged an Allahabad High Court order...
Complainant in hate speech case against Yogi Adityanath held for gangrape
cjp -
His SC plea challenged an Allahabad High Court order...
Top aide agrees to turn approver, Adityanath’s goose cooked?
cjp -
In what could be a body blow to Uttar...
FIR against H. Raja for insulting police, judiciary in Tamil Nadu
BJP national secretary H. Raja is in hot water...
Dalit Assertion: Bhim Army at Jantar Mantar
First Published on : May 21, 2017Defying attempts by...
The Kanwars : Infamous Shiv Bhakts of North India
Catch the full episode of Bharat Ek Mauj with...
Trending
Related VIDEOS
ALL STORIES
ALL STORIES
India
Pervasive fear, surveillance of media, spiral of anti-India sentiment in Kashmir: CCG
Concerned Citizens’ Group (CCG) –a voluntary initiative set up in 2016--on its eleventh visit to Kashmir and Jammu, from October 28 to 31, 2025 and meetings with political actors, businessmen, teachers and other professionals apart from activists has released its report recently
India
Vande Mataram: How the recent discussions in Parliament around the national song initiated by the ruling regime stem from motives that are questionable
Retired Judge of the Madras High Court, K Chandru writes: the enforced debate in Parliament by the RSS-driven National Democratic Alliance (NDA) seeks to create a controversy over Vande Mataram raising concerns over the intentions of the present government; ‘A non-issue is being much importance and publicity’ he says
Minorities
Allahabad HC slams overzealous police action, says distributing Bibles or preaching Christianity is not an offence under UP conversion law
Bench flags suspicious FIR, delayed ‘victim’ statements, and questions complainant’s conduct in alleged conversion case
India
Baba Adhav is no more; his Life and Work remain an inspiration for those working for Justice and Equality
Baba Adhav’s unique work was encompassed in an approach that saw dismantling of the shackles of caste, hierarchy and discrimination through meticulous and inspired organisation of the invisibilised unorganised workforce –hamals (head-loaders), rag-pickers and domestic workers—towards a combination of improved living conditions, working conditions and social conditions, a sense of dignity and pride in their work
India
Beware of Aadhaar: A warning on India’s biometric identity model on International Human Rights Day
On the eve of International Human Rights Day, 50 +, several organisations and individuals have launched a “Beware of Aadhaar” Campaign: The signatories have flagged the issue that Aadhaar is “not a model to emulate but it raises serious concerns about surveillance, exclusion and rights violations on the ground. This statement, “Beware of Aadhar” offers a concise critique of India’s digital ID experiment and why exporting it is dangerous
Communalism
The Taj Story & Resurgence of a Myth, the ideological engineering of a Brahmanical narrative of pseudo-history
Tejo Mahalay & Mina Bazar: P. N. Oak’s Pseudohistory demeaning both Muslims & Rajputs, is both Communal and Casteist; P. N. Oak’s legacy is not one of historical revision but of ideological engineering. His “Tejo Mahalay” myth and “Mina Bazar” fantasy are not just anti-Muslim—they are anti-Rajput and fundamentally Brahminical
Rule of Law
Gujarat High Court calls out “routine emergency”, strikes down years of Section 144 orders, demands transparency in all future restrictions
In its ruling, the Court holds that Ahmedabad Police normalised extraordinary powers, suppressed peaceful dissent, and failed to inform the public — directing that all future prohibitory orders must be published across social media and modern communication platforms
