Law & Justice

Malegaon 2006 Blast Case: Bombay High Court rejects NIA’s ‘alternate narrative’, holds prosecution built on contradictions and inadmissible evidence

Holding that “diagonally opposite” narratives by investigative agencies cannot sustain a trial, the Court finds the NIA’s case rooted in retracted statements, hearsay material, and a legally impermissible reinvestigation—bringing the prosecution to a “dead end”

Controversial Anti-Trafficking Bill tabled in Parliament

Critics say it could further harm vulnerable communities  On Wednesday,...

Women Respond to Madras HC Judgement: Father’s Name not Required in Birth Certificates

In a landmark judgment, the Madras High Court ruled...

No Coercive Steps against Kanhaiya: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has directed that no coercive...

SC condemns culture of ‘mobocracy’, directs govt to step up action

Landmark judgment warns people against taking law into their...

The Truth Behind The Tuticorin Massacre

On May 22, 2018, police fired into a crowd...

Fundamental rights of Narmada river communities have been violated: Justice Gowda

A Jan Adalat (public hearing) was called by activist...

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

Malegaon 2006 Blast Case: Bombay High Court rejects NIA’s ‘alternate narrative’, holds prosecution built on contradictions and inadmissible evidence

Holding that “diagonally opposite” narratives by investigative agencies cannot sustain a trial, the Court finds the NIA’s case rooted in retracted statements, hearsay material, and a legally impermissible reinvestigation—bringing the prosecution to a “dead end”

Delhi court orders FIR against Abhijit Iyer Mitra for sexually abusive posts targeting women journalists

Court finds tweets “sexually coloured,” prima facie intended to outrage modesty; directs police probe into X account and devices

From Cow Slaughter to “Public Order”: Allahabad High Court’s expanding use of preventive detention

Through detailed reliance on fear, timing, intelligence inputs, and administrative response, the Court stretches “public order” to justify preventive detention—raising difficult questions about liberty, evidence, and constitutional limits

From FIRs to “Corporate Jihad”: How the TCS Nashik case was transformed from an investigation into a communal narrative

As police probe serious claims of harassment, a parallel story of conspiracy and conversion dominates public discourse