Law & Justice

Reproductive Autonomy Cannot Be Subordinated to Adoption: Supreme Court allows termination of 7-month pregnancy of minor

Holding that a woman’s choice is paramount under Article 21, the SC affirms that constitutional courts must prioritise dignity, mental health, and bodily autonomy over statutory limits under the MTP framework

PILs Should Be Heard by Collegium Says SC Bar Assn Expressing Grave Concern

Supreme Court Bar Association expresses 'grave' concern' over differences...

A Judiciary Made to Measure

Close to two years ago, 15 months after the...

Guardians of Democracy: 4 judges openly challenge Nepotism in the SC

‘Preserve SC, Protect Democracy’ say the Judges in a...

Right Wing Student Insults Dalit Prof at HCU

2nd Anniv Rohith Vemula's Death, January 17, 2018: ABVP...

Betrayal by the State: Policemen off the hook

Introduction:This article was published in Communalism Combat following Teesta...

People of Rajsamand say no to Hatred and Intolerance!

Insaniyat and Aman Citizens’ Committee formed to ensure peace...

How the controversial triple talaq Bill passed by Lok Sabha can be salvaged

Supreme Court lawyer Indira Jaising, who had appeared for...

2017 — The Year Gender Justice Took a Back Seat

While judgements become part of the history of law...

Hatred & Intolerance are Your Parentage, Devanoora Mahadave tells Anant Kumar Hegde

An Open Letter to Anant Kumar Hegde Sahi: 'Sahanadharma' ('Religion...

Kosi Sori is Podiyami Jogi: Another fake encounter in Chhattisgarh?

In a video released on December 23, journalist and...

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

Reproductive Autonomy Cannot Be Subordinated to Adoption: Supreme Court allows termination of 7-month pregnancy of minor

Holding that a woman’s choice is paramount under Article 21, the SC affirms that constitutional courts must prioritise dignity, mental health, and bodily autonomy over statutory limits under the MTP framework

Malegaon 2006 Blast Case: Bombay High Court rejects NIA’s ‘alternate narrative’, holds prosecution built on contradictions and inadmissible evidence

Holding that “diagonally opposite” narratives by investigative agencies cannot sustain a trial, the Court finds the NIA’s case rooted in retracted statements, hearsay material, and a legally impermissible reinvestigation—bringing the prosecution to a “dead end”

Delhi court orders FIR against Abhijit Iyer Mitra for sexually abusive posts targeting women journalists

Court finds tweets “sexually coloured,” prima facie intended to outrage modesty; directs police probe into X account and devices

From Cow Slaughter to “Public Order”: Allahabad High Court’s expanding use of preventive detention

Through detailed reliance on fear, timing, intelligence inputs, and administrative response, the Court stretches “public order” to justify preventive detention—raising difficult questions about liberty, evidence, and constitutional limits

From FIRs to “Corporate Jihad”: How the TCS Nashik case was transformed from an investigation into a communal narrative

As police probe serious claims of harassment, a parallel story of conspiracy and conversion dominates public discourse