Rule of Law

‘We will challenge notices in Court’: IFF’s statement on legal notice over ‘defaming’ RSS

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) details a legal notice issued on behalf of the RSS over its documentation of censorship in India, and the police action that followed, raising concerns over freedom of expression

All Is Not Well within the SC & this needs Correction: Kamini Jaiswal

Yesterday was an Unfortunate Day in the History of...

PILs Should Be Heard by Collegium Says SC Bar Assn Expressing Grave Concern

Supreme Court Bar Association expresses 'grave' concern' over differences...

A Judiciary Made to Measure

Close to two years ago, 15 months after the...

Guardians of Democracy: 4 judges openly challenge Nepotism in the SC

‘Preserve SC, Protect Democracy’ say the Judges in a...

Right Wing Student Insults Dalit Prof at HCU

2nd Anniv Rohith Vemula's Death, January 17, 2018: ABVP...

Betrayal by the State: Policemen off the hook

Introduction:This article was published in Communalism Combat following Teesta...

People of Rajsamand say no to Hatred and Intolerance!

Insaniyat and Aman Citizens’ Committee formed to ensure peace...

How the controversial triple talaq Bill passed by Lok Sabha can be salvaged

Supreme Court lawyer Indira Jaising, who had appeared for...

2017 — The Year Gender Justice Took a Back Seat

While judgements become part of the history of law...

Hatred & Intolerance are Your Parentage, Devanoora Mahadave tells Anant Kumar Hegde

An Open Letter to Anant Kumar Hegde Sahi: 'Sahanadharma' ('Religion...

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

‘We will challenge notices in Court’: IFF’s statement on legal notice over ‘defaming’ RSS

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) details a legal notice issued on behalf of the RSS over its documentation of censorship in India, and the police action that followed, raising concerns over freedom of expression

SC: Article 142, Mass Amnesties, and the Panchayatisation of the Rule of Law

Within a month of youth-led protests in Delhi and at least half a dozen other locations, the Supreme Court’s September 1 Order invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 to quash criminal cases registered across at least five states. This examines the limitations of this ad hoc jurisprudence, arguing that while protection from abusive state prosecution is welcome, linking it to the cancellation of the September 5 march sets a troubling precedent. Constitutional scrutiny demanded a rigorous examination of alleged executive and police overreach, including blanket prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS and the shutdown of metro stations and internet services. Instead, the alleged excesses of Delhi and other police forces remain unadjudicated.

Need for Clarity on the SIR: An Open Letter to the Congress Leaders of Karnataka

While the national leadership of the party, leads and articulates the national campaign for the scrapping of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, the state leadership of Karnataka, a state governed by the party, gives conflicting statements almost endorsing a process that has disenfranchised close to 10 million there

From Arunachal to Delhi, anti-dam protesters face state crackdown; detained allege sexual assault

Around 40 protesters from Arunachal Pradesh were detained during a solidarity demonstration, as the crackdown on indigenous resistance to the proposed mega dam intensifies

Beyond Appropriation: Vidya Bhushan Rawat’s recovery of Bose’s inclusive nationalism

Rawat’s book emerges from a unique perspective that argues –among other things – that Bose and Nehru must be understood through their competing strategies, and historical circumstances— not recruited retrospectively into opposing political camps; neither does the book place Bose beyond criticism, affirming however his intrinsic secular outlook while stressing on diverse networks that helped sustain the struggle for independence’ not a biography of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose but a chronicle of Indian National Army as well as India’s freedom Movement.