Rule of Law

‘We will challenge notices in Court’: IFF’s statement on legal notice over ‘defaming’ RSS

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) details a legal notice issued on behalf of the RSS over its documentation of censorship in India, and the police action that followed, raising concerns over freedom of expression

Achche Din? From job-less’ to ‘job-loss’ economy

The falling work participation rate shows that the economy...

What does the Citizens Draft of the Egalitarian Uniform Civil Code Say?

Sabrangindia has exclusively accessed the draft of the uniform...

Claims of ‘Love Jehad’ Not Borne Out by Facts: UP

The latest Hindutva mascot of the BJP and the...

Five Judges of the SC will Now Decide whether Women Can Enter Sabarimala

Can women enter Sabarimala? Supreme Court refers case to...

Delhi High Court sets aside JNU steps against Kanhaiya, Others

The Delhi High Court set aside the disciplinary action...

Need Uniform Civil Code (UCC) that is Egalitarian, Citizens hand Draft to Law Panel Chief

As many as eight eminent citizens, including scholars, a...

Reporting from Ground Zero, Yeovatmal: Pesticide Deaths in Kapas (Cotton)Cultivation

  Photo of Father (Rajarao Vadkar  )of a farmer (Vijay...

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

The spectacle of protest: Why the Ambedkarite movement must guard its autonomy

In an era where digital capitalism turns dissent into a brand, true anti-caste politics must resist binary thinking and protect its historical independence

‘We will challenge notices in Court’: IFF’s statement on legal notice over ‘defaming’ RSS

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) details a legal notice issued on behalf of the RSS over its documentation of censorship in India, and the police action that followed, raising concerns over freedom of expression

SC: Article 142, Mass Amnesties, and the Panchayatisation of the Rule of Law

Within a month of youth-led protests in Delhi and at least half a dozen other locations, the Supreme Court’s September 1 Order invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 to quash criminal cases registered across at least five states. This examines the limitations of this ad hoc jurisprudence, arguing that while protection from abusive state prosecution is welcome, linking it to the cancellation of the September 5 march sets a troubling precedent. Constitutional scrutiny demanded a rigorous examination of alleged executive and police overreach, including blanket prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS and the shutdown of metro stations and internet services. Instead, the alleged excesses of Delhi and other police forces remain unadjudicated.

Need for Clarity on the SIR: An Open Letter to the Congress Leaders of Karnataka

While the national leadership of the party, leads and articulates the national campaign for the scrapping of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, the state leadership of Karnataka, a state governed by the party, gives conflicting statements almost endorsing a process that has disenfranchised close to 10 million there

From Arunachal to Delhi, anti-dam protesters face state crackdown; detained allege sexual assault

Around 40 protesters from Arunachal Pradesh were detained during a solidarity demonstration, as the crackdown on indigenous resistance to the proposed mega dam intensifies