Rule of Law

‘We will challenge notices in Court’: IFF’s statement on legal notice over ‘defaming’ RSS

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) details a legal notice issued on behalf of the RSS over its documentation of censorship in India, and the police action that followed, raising concerns over freedom of expression

Mumbai Meri Jaan: All Faiths Unite to Provide Succour

Photo Courtesy: Indian ExpressEven as early morning warnings (Tuesday,...

The Coming of Age of the Indian Judiciary, A Cause for Celebration

The Indian Judiciary (at least a good section of...

India at 70: after the celebrations, single-party dominance menaces democracy

Seventy years ago, Jawaharlal Nehru’s famous “Tryst with Destiny”...

“The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Right to Privacy is Momentous and Historic”

Right to Privacy is a fundamental rightA nine-judge bench...

Cow goons strike again, lynch 2 Muslims in Bengal on suspicion of cow theft

In June, three Muslim youths were lynched by villagers...

The Triple Talaq Case: The Unjust Muslim Men and Their Unjust Leaders

When a people and their leadership become iniquitous (Zalim),...

Shouldn’t Sakshi Maharaj have been pulled up in Mann ki Baat?

BJP MP Sakshi Maharaj escaped any chastisement from prime...

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

The spectacle of protest: Why the Ambedkarite movement must guard its autonomy

In an era where digital capitalism turns dissent into a brand, true anti-caste politics must resist binary thinking and protect its historical independence

‘We will challenge notices in Court’: IFF’s statement on legal notice over ‘defaming’ RSS

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) details a legal notice issued on behalf of the RSS over its documentation of censorship in India, and the police action that followed, raising concerns over freedom of expression

SC: Article 142, Mass Amnesties, and the Panchayatisation of the Rule of Law

Within a month of youth-led protests in Delhi and at least half a dozen other locations, the Supreme Court’s September 1 Order invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 to quash criminal cases registered across at least five states. This examines the limitations of this ad hoc jurisprudence, arguing that while protection from abusive state prosecution is welcome, linking it to the cancellation of the September 5 march sets a troubling precedent. Constitutional scrutiny demanded a rigorous examination of alleged executive and police overreach, including blanket prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS and the shutdown of metro stations and internet services. Instead, the alleged excesses of Delhi and other police forces remain unadjudicated.

Need for Clarity on the SIR: An Open Letter to the Congress Leaders of Karnataka

While the national leadership of the party, leads and articulates the national campaign for the scrapping of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, the state leadership of Karnataka, a state governed by the party, gives conflicting statements almost endorsing a process that has disenfranchised close to 10 million there

From Arunachal to Delhi, anti-dam protesters face state crackdown; detained allege sexual assault

Around 40 protesters from Arunachal Pradesh were detained during a solidarity demonstration, as the crackdown on indigenous resistance to the proposed mega dam intensifies