Email: sabrangind@gmail.com
How the Supreme Court built a binding legal framework to protect student mental heath
In a case where the father of a NEET aspirant sought fair investigation into the suspicious death of his daughter, the SC in a pivotal July 2025 ruling, apart from intervening on that question went further: in establishing a comprehensive, binding legal framework to protect student mental health across India. An analysis of the Supreme Court judgment in Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Student groups from IITs, BHU condemn the state targeting one of their own as “Maoists”
Coordination of Science and Technology Institutes’ Student Associations (COSTISA),...
Protests erupt over participation of three North East CMs in ABVP’s event at JNU
The ABVP said the visit was not associated with...
NSUI’s Gujarat State Sect resigns, cites ideological betrayal in the organisation
Many leaders of Indian National Congress’ student wing work...
History Of Constructors And Destroyers – A Discourse On Harappa And Rigveda
The archaeological evidence shows that the first ever city—Harappa–...
33% Teaching Posts Vacant, Indian University Crisis Hits Rankings, Teaching, Research
Mumbai: India is one of the world’s top five...
Students forced to drop out of schools as tea estates down shutters without notice
cjp -
With the sudden shutdown of Kumal Tea Estate in...
Bangladesh: When grown-ups hijack a children’s movement
A protest that started out with good intentions was...
Bangladesh: VCs ask for release of students, minister says no
Sabrang -
Nurul Islam Nahid, however, said no innocent student will...
93% JNU teachers vote for VC’s removal
Out of total 586 listed faculty members at JNU,...
DU students to protest arbitrary UGC admission rules
The collective said that the University and the UGC...
Trending
Related VIDEOS
ALL STORIES
ALL STORIES
India
Rahul Gandhi alleges ‘industrial-scale vote theft’ in Haryana Polls, claims 25 lakh fake voters added with EC-BJP collusion
At a press conference ahead of Bihar’s first phase of polling, the Congress leader unveiled “The H Files,” alleging systematic manipulation of Haryana’s electoral rolls, use of a Brazilian model’s photo in 22 voter IDs, and “industrialised rigging” under the Election Commission’s watch
India
Pregnant woman deported despite parents on 2002 SIR rolls, another homemaker commits suicide
In West Bengal, a pregnant woman’s deportation despite her parents’ names on the 2002 voter list, and a homemaker’s suicide amid renewed SIR-NRC fears, lay bare a growing climate of dread—where citizenship, identity, and the right to belong have become matters of anxiety and loss
World
Seven Dimensions of Zohran Mamdani’s Win Hold Significance For Indians
His triumph demonstrates that that an authentic progressive position has political rewards even in a city identified with capitalism, that youth can overcome entrenched political leaders, that economic redistribution still motivates voters, and that moral consistency on difficult issues can be rewarded rather than punished.
India
Silence in the Statistics: What NCRB data won’t tell you about dissent
When fewer crimes are recorded, it may signal not peace, but the success of a system designed to silence without a trace
Communalism
Uttarakhand HC pulls up police over mob attack in Ramnagar, seeks action against BJP leader for inciting communal violence
Bench directs action taken report by November 6; Petitioner alleges political protection to main accused
India
Ritwik Ghatak transcended realms unexplored to reinvent art of Indian revolutionary film making
One hundred years of Ritwik Ghatak on November 4 (November 4, 1925-February 6, 1976), revolutionary filmmaker, visionary artist, and committed Marxist. His work continues to influences profoundly, unsettling and inspiring in equal measure
India
The Silencing of Dissent: Bar Council’s suspension of Advocate Asim Sarode is a stark case of selective justice
While Pune-based lawyer Asim Sarode is punished for critiquing judicial complacency and political overreach, lawyers who have delivered actual hate speeches walk free. The Bar Council’s action marks a chilling moment for freedom of speech in the legal profession