History

Understanding power through caste: Dr. Ambedkar’s contribution to the sociology of law

Dr Babasaheb’s understanding of Indian society was pivotal: he was prescient in the dangers that loomed ahead, even after drafting the Indian Constitution; because caste-based inequality remains deeply entrenched in society and the post-Independence state did not go much beyond providing formal equality to the lower castes and other marginalised communities, Dr. Ambedkar was acutely aware of the continuing presence of upper-caste hegemony from society to politics and from culture to the economy

Five-pound history lesson: animal fat and the British empire’s biggest revolt

On first reading about the protests because the new...

6 दिसंबरः मैने इतिहास को नंग धड़ंग देखा !

…अयोध्या आंदोलन के नेताओं के लिए न्यायपालिका नौटंकी कंपनी...

Marx, Gandhi and Modernity – Essays Presented to Javeed Alam

Professor Prabhat Patnaik's short piece on Javeed Alam. For people...

एक देश की मौत – भाग 1

First Published on: December 14, 2015 Image Courtesy: frontline.inवो...

‘बापू का चरखा’ टाइम पत्रिका की 100 सबसे प्रभावशाली तस्वीरों में शामिल

टाइम पत्रिका ने 100 सबसे प्रभावशाली तस्वीरों के अपने...

A Challenging First Year for Sabrangindia, November 26, 2016

 Today at the stroke of the midnight hour, thanks...

History revisited: How Tughlaq’s currency change led to chaos in 14th century India

The major gamble the Delhi sultan took with the...

 Is the Re-Birth of the National Herald a Call to Arms by the Congress ?

On November 14, 2016, Pandit Nehru’s Birth Anniversary, the...

That awkward Moment Tipu Sultan restored a Hindu Temple that the Marathas sacked

Today, medieval India is seen as a place of...

Trump’s Victory: the ‘Whitelash’ against the Liberal Order

The new nativism thrives off the failures of neoliberalism....

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

Reproductive Autonomy Cannot Be Subordinated to Adoption: Supreme Court allows termination of 7-month pregnancy of minor

Holding that a woman’s choice is paramount under Article 21, the SC affirms that constitutional courts must prioritise dignity, mental health, and bodily autonomy over statutory limits under the MTP framework

Malegaon 2006 Blast Case: Bombay High Court rejects NIA’s ‘alternate narrative’, holds prosecution built on contradictions and inadmissible evidence

Holding that “diagonally opposite” narratives by investigative agencies cannot sustain a trial, the Court finds the NIA’s case rooted in retracted statements, hearsay material, and a legally impermissible reinvestigation—bringing the prosecution to a “dead end”

Delhi court orders FIR against Abhijit Iyer Mitra for sexually abusive posts targeting women journalists

Court finds tweets “sexually coloured,” prima facie intended to outrage modesty; directs police probe into X account and devices

From Cow Slaughter to “Public Order”: Allahabad High Court’s expanding use of preventive detention

Through detailed reliance on fear, timing, intelligence inputs, and administrative response, the Court stretches “public order” to justify preventive detention—raising difficult questions about liberty, evidence, and constitutional limits

From FIRs to “Corporate Jihad”: How the TCS Nashik case was transformed from an investigation into a communal narrative

As police probe serious claims of harassment, a parallel story of conspiracy and conversion dominates public discourse