Society

University of Hyderabad professor calls alumnus ‘Dalit untouchable idiot’; complainant rejects department’s bid to close matter with apology

An alumnus of the University of Hyderabad has rejected the History department’s attempt to settle a complaint against professor Dr Vijay Ramdas Mandala with an apology, and demanded disciplinary action against him. The professor allegedly called the alumnus a “Dalit untouchable idiot” and described students from Bihar and Jharkhand as “third-rate, poverty-ridden idiots” in an email

Bombay HC quashes and sets aside Media Gag Order in Sohrabuddin Case

The Bombay High Court has quashed the November 2017...

Nehru, Ambedkar and Challenge of Majoritarianism

(Photo courtesy : The hoot)(To be published in the...

Restore Press Freedom, Allow Coverage of Soharbuddin Trial: BUJ, Journos to HC

BUJ and journos move Bombay High Court seeking a...

Remembering a Man of Conviction, Rohith Vemula on His Second Death Anniversary

“Rohith was a Man of Convictions. Nobody could have...

Right Wing Student Insults Dalit Prof at HCU

2nd Anniv Rohith Vemula's Death, January 17, 2018: ABVP...

Anatomy of a Hate Crime – The Bombay Riots Story

The narrative of mass violence targeted against India’s religious...

SAHMAT’s Jashn-e-Daura: Remembering Safdar and the Babri Masjid

Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust (SAHMAT) celebrated 1 January 2018...

On Bhima Koregaon, your Janaeu was shining brightly on Republic TV: An open letter to Arnab Goswami

Dear Mr Arnab Goswami,Your debate #Endcastepolitics on both 2nd...

Trending

Related VIDEOS

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES

University of Hyderabad professor calls alumnus ‘Dalit untouchable idiot’; complainant rejects department’s bid to close matter with apology

An alumnus of the University of Hyderabad has rejected the History department’s attempt to settle a complaint against professor Dr Vijay Ramdas Mandala with an apology, and demanded disciplinary action against him. The professor allegedly called the alumnus a “Dalit untouchable idiot” and described students from Bihar and Jharkhand as “third-rate, poverty-ridden idiots” in an email

Diwali travel rush exposes unchecked profiteering by private bus operators as fares soar to Rs 7,000

Passengers slam Maharashtra Transport Minister Pratap Sarnaik over alleged regulatory failure as Pune RTO announces inspections until November 20

The spectacle of protest: Why the Ambedkarite movement must guard its autonomy

In an era where digital capitalism turns dissent into a brand, true anti-caste politics must resist binary thinking and protect its historical independence

‘We will challenge notices in Court’: IFF’s statement on legal notice over ‘defaming’ RSS

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) details a legal notice issued on behalf of the RSS over its documentation of censorship in India, and the police action that followed, raising concerns over freedom of expression

SC: Article 142, Mass Amnesties, and the Panchayatisation of the Rule of Law

Within a month of youth-led protests in Delhi and at least half a dozen other locations, the Supreme Court’s September 1 Order invoked its extraordinary powers under Article 142 to quash criminal cases registered across at least five states. This examines the limitations of this ad hoc jurisprudence, arguing that while protection from abusive state prosecution is welcome, linking it to the cancellation of the September 5 march sets a troubling precedent. Constitutional scrutiny demanded a rigorous examination of alleged executive and police overreach, including blanket prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS and the shutdown of metro stations and internet services. Instead, the alleged excesses of Delhi and other police forces remain unadjudicated.

Need for Clarity on the SIR: An Open Letter to the Congress Leaders of Karnataka

While the national leadership of the party, leads and articulates the national campaign for the scrapping of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, the state leadership of Karnataka, a state governed by the party, gives conflicting statements almost endorsing a process that has disenfranchised close to 10 million there